Nightcrawler
Member
So relented and bought the 686 seven-shooter today, 4" barrel. I like the weight and balance of this gun, and it's going to give my 625 a run for its money for my favorite handgun, I think. (I'll have to shoot it first to be sure.) I should not have spent the money right now, though. So I have to pay for it by selling off two virtually unused handguns from my meger collection. They'll get better homes and I'll feel better that way.
Thoughts? Well, part of me isn't wonder if I shouldn't have gotten the six-shot model. I understand the seven-shot is just as strong, but the six-shot cost less. Additionally, they have the Safariland Comp-III spring-loaded speedloaders available for the six-shots. Personally, I don't have a problem with HKS (they're the only speedloaders I've used, in fact), but the Safarilands might be nice to try (though it might be bad to hit that button before you get the rounds lined up and eject your reload across the room).
However, I do like the extra shot. Also, the trigger pull is noticably shorter than my 625 or my 642. This will make rapid fire easier, I suspect.
I don't like the Hogue monogrip the gun comes with. Not only are the fingergrooves incompatible with my fingers, but one of the ejecting cases tends to get stuck against the left side of the grip. I'm open to suggestions for a replacement. I prefer no finger grooves grips and wish S&W would make their JM grips for the L-Frame.
It's my first "normal" revolver. My first three were N-Frames with 6 and 5 inch barrels. Hard to find stuff for. Holsters and accessories for the L-Frame are all over, since it was so popular as a law enforcement gun for years.
Now all I need is ammo, speedloaders, and holsters. Though, with the box of 125 grain Golden Saber .38 +Ps I've got for my snubby, the 686 replaces my snubby as my bedside gun. I'll probably invest in some Glaser Safety Slugs (or similar) for home defense, though. I live in a thin-walled apartment. General carry? I'm thinking 158 grain JHP.
One gripe? The machine work and finishing aren't quite as fine as my 625. Of course, my 625 cost more than a hundred dollars more...
Thoughts? Well, part of me isn't wonder if I shouldn't have gotten the six-shot model. I understand the seven-shot is just as strong, but the six-shot cost less. Additionally, they have the Safariland Comp-III spring-loaded speedloaders available for the six-shots. Personally, I don't have a problem with HKS (they're the only speedloaders I've used, in fact), but the Safarilands might be nice to try (though it might be bad to hit that button before you get the rounds lined up and eject your reload across the room).
However, I do like the extra shot. Also, the trigger pull is noticably shorter than my 625 or my 642. This will make rapid fire easier, I suspect.
I don't like the Hogue monogrip the gun comes with. Not only are the fingergrooves incompatible with my fingers, but one of the ejecting cases tends to get stuck against the left side of the grip. I'm open to suggestions for a replacement. I prefer no finger grooves grips and wish S&W would make their JM grips for the L-Frame.
It's my first "normal" revolver. My first three were N-Frames with 6 and 5 inch barrels. Hard to find stuff for. Holsters and accessories for the L-Frame are all over, since it was so popular as a law enforcement gun for years.
Now all I need is ammo, speedloaders, and holsters. Though, with the box of 125 grain Golden Saber .38 +Ps I've got for my snubby, the 686 replaces my snubby as my bedside gun. I'll probably invest in some Glaser Safety Slugs (or similar) for home defense, though. I live in a thin-walled apartment. General carry? I'm thinking 158 grain JHP.
One gripe? The machine work and finishing aren't quite as fine as my 625. Of course, my 625 cost more than a hundred dollars more...