I was “SCAR-ed” by the R.E.P.R.

vanfunk

Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2003
Messages
1,301
Location
The widening gyre
So, in the last few months I’ve been making up for lost time. As I have mentioned before in other threads, I took a 15-year break from shooting to focus on family and career. Now that the kids are older and I’ve backed way off from my high-stress career, I’ve been rebuilding my gun collection and spending more time at the range. As much as I adore blued steel and figured walnut, I tend to favor shooting 7.62 and 5.56 military-style rifles. To that extent, I’ve re-armed myself with a variety of high-end AR-15s and a Daniel Defense AR-10 (DD5) as my first foray into .308 ARs. When my LGS got in an LWRC R.E.P.R. MKII in 7.62, well, I just kinda had to have it.
upload_2023-7-3_15-15-53.jpeg
Now that it’s broken in and the barrel has “settled down,” it’ll shoot .5 moa or a little less with FGMM. Downsides? Sure. It’s a pig. A 13lb pig. It’s practically a crew-served weapon. Granted, it does relegate the recoil to that of a 20” AR, and I think it’s about as accurate as a gas gun can be. Nevertheless I ended up longing for a 7.62 battle rifle that was lighter than the Reaper, lighter than my DD5, lighter and more maneuverable than my M1A loaded.

So when the owner of one of my LGSs emailed me and said he was running a sale on SCAR 17s, I had to go over for a look-see. When I got there and hoisted one off the rack, I was really surprised by it’s light weight. Spending so much time with my bloated-tick rifles had me expecting I’d be wielding another I-beam, I suppose. I pretty much liked everything about it - the weight of course, but the ergos were pretty good for a lefty and it shouldered naturally. The rifle was $700 less than what I had seen in other local stores so, yeah, predictably I took it home. Once out of the box I field stripped it (easy), lubed it in the right places per the manual, slapped an ACOG TA11 on it (green crosshair, my fave) and hit the range. What ensued there was pretty amazing, actually. First off, I found the rifle very easy to shoot. The recoil impulse is very different from AR-pattern rifles and, to my shoulder, doesn’t kick like one would expect of an 8lb battle rifle with military ammo. Next surprise was the accuracy with ball ammo. My DD, Reaper, and M1A won’t really do better than 2.5 moa with M80 ball, although they are extremely accurate rifles with premium ammo. But the SCAR was popping them all into 1.5” without really trying (Prvi Partisan PPU surplus). FGMM shrunk the groups to an inch and occasionally a little under. I found the ACOG to be a marvelous piece of glass for this rifle; the generous eye relief, crystal-clear glass and uncluttered reticle make it a joy on the range. I didn’t shoot it past 200 yards but I can’t imagine it would be difficult to absolutely command (sorry for the split infinitive) an area between 0-500 yards with good M80 ball ammo. AND it’s not a PIG! As currently configured it weighs like 8.5lbs. Even my 12-year-old daughter likes it. C’mon, man, that’s just awesome. So, I may discover some niggles here and there as time goes on (ok, one niggle is the trigger - it sucks, plainly. But I have a Geissele Super Scar on the way), but so far I am really impressed with the SCAR. I’m keeping my other .30’s because they all do what they’re supposed to do, but wow - the SCAR is really, really flippin’ good.
upload_2023-7-3_15-47-1.jpeg
 
Order the KDG butt stock for the SCAR. It gets rid of the Ugg boot look and gives a more solid feel. I tried twice to love the SCAR-17 and ultimately sold both of mine. I just didn’t get the same warm and fuzzy that you are getting. I ended up with a POF-USA Rogue for a lightweight 308 semi-auto.

The REPR has always intrigued me, and I’m going to own one some day. I’ve never seen a negative review on the REPR that I can remember.
 
Thanks folks! Mav, that is hilarious! And so true… Marksman, I have checked out the KDG buttstock and it certainly looks like a worthy upgrade. I am going to shoot it some more as-is and then think about some upgrades, i.e. stock, charging handles, etc. So far all I’ve done is add some picatinny rail covers so my delicate hands don’t feel like I’ve been scouring them with a cheese grater. I have heard great things about the Rogue - nice choice! The REPR has its detractors out there, as does LWRC (some say they’re just a bunch of a-holes). I don’t know - I have a sample size of one to go by and my example is a high-quality, accurate and reliable rifle. I could probably beat it with a nice target bolt action but why? I love me some semi-auto fun. Now back to the range!
 
Thanks folks! Mav, that is hilarious! And so true… Marksman, I have checked out the KDG buttstock and it certainly looks like a worthy upgrade. I am going to shoot it some more as-is and then think about some upgrades, i.e. stock, charging handles, etc. So far all I’ve done is add some picatinny rail covers so my delicate hands don’t feel like I’ve been scouring them with a cheese grater. I have heard great things about the Rogue - nice choice! The REPR has its detractors out there, as does LWRC (some say they’re just a bunch of a-holes). I don’t know - I have a sample size of one to go by and my example is a high-quality, accurate and reliable rifle. I could probably beat it with a nice target bolt action but why? I love me some semi-auto fun. Now back to the range!
I’m trying to remember what all I added to my last SCAR. I know I had the KDG stock, the Geissele trigger, a Midwest Ind extended rail and I think a Midwest Ind charging handle. It was a slick set up, but it just ended up feeling clumsy in my hands.
4D825373-B458-471E-B2B8-16EB2C79B94D.jpeg
 
^^^ Very nice! Though I can see how it might have felt clumsy. I don’t think I am going to add anything else to my SCAR and just keep it light and ready. I kind of wish I had the FDE version because it would be a companion to my SIG M17, but nah, honestly I feel like there’s a little too much FDE in the world right now. :)
 
^^^ Very nice! Though I can see how it might have felt clumsy. I don’t think I am going to add anything else to my SCAR and just keep it light and ready. I kind of wish I had the FDE version because it would be a companion to my SIG M17, but nah, honestly I feel like there’s a little too much FDE in the world right now. :)
Honestly, as a whole, the SCARs just feel clumsy. Maybe bulky is a better word. They aren’t heavy. They just feel massive. I never had any complaints with how they shot though. Plenty accurate for what I was doing with them. Never had a malfunction with either of them, which is more than I can say for my Rogue.
 
Update on the SCAR: i put the Geissele “Super SCAR” trigger in today and, as always, what a difference. The stock FN “milspec” trigger was robust but creepy, gritty and heavy as Hell. The Geissele trigger has a butter-smooth 1st stage of about 2lbs and then a very clean break at about another 1.5lbs. The installation was a little more involved than an AR trigger but still a “1” on the difficulty scale. I scored it on sale for about 40% off and it feels so much better. Adding a Geissele to my AR-15s and AR-10s has shrunk my groups by 25-50% so let’s see what this one does for the Scar. I hit the range again on Tuesday.
 
Sweet. I have the geissele in my SCAR-16 and the Timmey in my SCAR-17. The Geissele is better for tactical/practical/run-n-gun stuff and the Timney single stage is great for DMR/precision stuff. But it’s slower than the Geissele.

If you get rail elimination panels it can slim up the forend considerably and these rifles don’t feel so bulky. Awesome rifles, both. Congrats!
 
Back
Top