If hostages are burned to death, then what?

Status
Not open for further replies.
iapetus,

That really shouldn't be funny.....but I can't stop laughing!:)


On a serious note, I would like to see the Japs revive that Samurai spirit just a little. There's been a real lack of good slice and dice movies lately.
 
What the Japanese government should have said is "Our forces are there in a non-combat role. If you harm them we will change that status to a combat role and they will be coming for you."
 
What the Japanese government should have said is "Our forces are there in a non-combat role. If you harm them we will change that status to a combat role and they will be coming for you."

AND

"we will send as many more as the the purpose of killing the people who killed our people, and the people who supported them requires"
 
Hostages

These hostages mean nothing. All these captives did by not fighting to the death was put a sword in the hands of our enemy. A weapon that will be used to scare the elderly and such. Dont forget that these civilians are mercenarys, over there because of the money! If we can find out where they are, then the D boys should go get them. Other than that they are already dead in my book. And please dont tell me i would think different if it was my son that was captured. He is thinking of signing on with KBR and I told him if he gets killed over there I will piss on his grave!:fire:
 
It would have to be a journalist and two aid workers or two journalist and an aid worker. It can't be both because it would have to be four or more to be a correct statement iapetus!:D
 
I think the proper response by the Japanes should be:

"We have been involved in a peaceful way giving aid up until this point. Due to the actions of these terrorists we will now be moving to an active military role in Iraq in support of the USA. For each citizen of ours murdered by a terrorist from now on we will send an additional 500 troops to Iraq to expand our role."

Might be cool to add "We will be bringing swords." to the end :evil:
 
marklbucla whined and cried that:
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I would like to see the Japs revive that Samurai spirit just a little
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



It doesn't look like you meant anything by it, but your slang is offensive.


:rolleyes: Geeeeezzz! Get a life. Why doesn't it surprise me that you're from the PRK?

[sigh] Freaking Political Correctness - is there no place safe from its tyranny?
 
Werewolf:

So I take it that you still refer to Blacks as N******?

You refer to the Jewish as K****?

You refer to Mexicans as S*****?

You refer to the Chinese as C*****?

Referring to the Japanese as "Japs" is not an abbreviation of the word, as in Jews is for the Jewish. This is not a PC issue, like refusing to call Blacks "African-Americans". It is a RACIST remark.


Allowing these things to pass isn't really taking thehighroad is it? It doesn't surprise me, but it should, that comments like these are allowed to stay on the forums for more than minutes before people comment on them.
 
Last edited:
Determining whether or not it was a racist remark requires us to look at context and intent. In this case, I don't believe the remark was racist. I think you're just looking to pick a fight.
 
So do you believe that it's okay to call a black man a N***** while speaking of one in a non-negative light? This is the exact same thing.

Again, this isn't a mere "P.C." issue, as in trying to sugar coat classifications of people.
 
Actually Mexicans would be B*****, G******, or W****** and Chinese would be G***.
But I agree with your point, although I don't think anything was meant by it. I think it was born of ignorance not insensitivity or racism. And I don't mean ignorance in a negative way, this is a new term of offense that most are not aware of.
But I do take the same offense to your use of Good Old Boy in the negative conotation that you meant it.
 
So...instead of using our anger towards the places it is so justly deserved, we are gonna' waste it on each other?

Those people are already dead...
 
marklbucla

So I take it that you still refer to Blacks as N******?

You refer to the Jewish as K****?

You refer to Mexicans as S*****?

You refer to the Chinese as C*****?
It is not as much whether he uses the term as his right to do so.

There is no Constitutonal right, however manufactured, not to be offended.

The only thing one may do in the case of racial epithets is rise above it in a mature way and ostracize those who offend them.
 
marklbucla asked?

So I take it that you still refer to Blacks as N******?

You refer to the Jewish as K****?

You refer to Mexicans as S*****?

You refer to the Chinese as C*****?

And have you stopped beating your wife yet marklbucla?

Nice try but I won't fall for it or stoop to your PC level of emotion based argument.

Being offended because someone used a word you don't like is your problem.

And now I get to be emotional...

I'm so sick of internet thought police like you deciding what words are ok and what aren't. You and all the rest of your ilk need to JUST STOP IT? There's too many real problems in the world to worry about silly stuff like words used to describe people.

Grow a thicker skin and worry about something a bit more important.
 
This thread should have been closed a day ago - maybe more.

Since the staff cannot be in all places at all times, we rely heavily on members to be self-policing with their comments. It works almost all the time on The High Road because of the high quality of our members.

This thread, however, is the exception that proves the rule. :(

You know who you are... :mad:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.