If you doubted Obama's gun ban agenda, read this...

Status
Not open for further replies.

MIgunguy

Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2008
Messages
308

Moderator Note: This article is "satire" that was posted here as a real news story. Please keep that in mind if you choose to read it.


This should put to rest anyone's doubt...


http://jumpinginpools.blogspot.com/2...r-elderly.html

Tuesday, January 27, 2009
Guns to Be Banned for Elderly
Staff Reports
United Press International
Washington

Deputy Attorney General Designate David Ogden is circulating a draft of an executive order in which, among other things, firearms possession would be severely limited to people over 60.

An assistant to Ogden told us, "It appears that in these changing times, it is no longer necessary to allow the elderly to be armed. With all of their physical ailments and increasing senility, to leave them in control of a deadly weapon would be ludicrous."

While the Executive Order may sound too powerful, experts in Constitutional law state that it is not actually un-Constitutional.

"It's a question of wording." states Columbia Law Professor, Dr. John Braxton. "The Constitution forbids the Congress, that is, the legislative branch, from passing any laws infringing on gun ownership. The executive branch is not included in this proviso. As long as the Congress doesn't get involved, it's technically a non-issue."

The Justice Department was tossing the idea of a gun ban for seniors during the Carter and Clinton Administration, but public opinion stopped these initiatives. Now, the Obama White House believes differently.

An unnamed aide close to Ogden agreed to talk on the condition of anonymity.

"Clinton and Carter didn't have as much of a mandate as President Obama. They were both Southerners, and the Second Amendment was sacrosanct to their constituents. However, President Obama comes from a new sort of politics, where divisive issues like firearms do not apply to him."

"Quite frankly, it's a shame that no one has had the good conscience to have done this already. It's a simple process, and the majority of the American people will understand it and follow the law."

The enforcement mechanism for this particular executive order has not been published. It is likely that the confiscation of weapons will be similar to Great Britain's handgun ban, in which citizens willingly gave the weapons to police.

It is expected that the executive order will be given around July 1, when senior-related gun deaths reach their peaks.

The aide to Ogden stated: "For eight years you see the rolling back of regulation, and crime has skyrocketed. In fact, in Massachusetts alone, murders have risen 50% since 2002. Armed robbery has also risen dramatically. With such circumstances, we must act boldly."
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Clinton and Carter didn't have as much of a mandate as President Obama.

If ohb wants a mandate, then he need look no further than the unprecedented gun sales and CCW permits issued since he became a serious contender to win the election. THAT is a M-F'n mandate! The rest is nothing more than useless liberal drivel.

As for singling out the elderly, I hope this is no surprise to anyone. His committed disregard for anybody who can't funnel the fruits of their labor into his massive government isn't worth having around, and certainly has no business defending themselves.
 
However, President Obama comes from a new sort of politics, where divisive issues like firearms do not apply to him."

We'll put that to the test.


The enforcement mechanism for this particular executive order has not been published. It is likely that the confiscation of weapons will be similar to Great Britain's handgun ban, in which citizens willingly gave the weapons to police.

I think the feds are in for a rude awakening.
 
wow thats a SHAME... so when you are over 60, you become some kind of untermenschen (sorry) with less rights ???

Something is wrong in these people's heads !
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top