If you had to choose one caliber to hunt all North American game which do you choose?

Status
Not open for further replies.
For those that think that a 30-06 is marginal on the big bears, read the first comment on the MidwayUsa page for the 220 gr. Nosler Partition

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Chris S. of Juneau, AK

Date posted: 8/23/2003

This bullet is truly a heavy weight performer king when it come to 30 cal. bullets. I took a nice 7 1/2 ft brown bear with this bullet in 30-06 (2550 fps) that was causing trouble around are camp near Yakutat, AK. the fall of 2001. Shot was taken at 40 yards broadside chest through the right shoulder. Dropped the bear in his tracks. The Nosler 220 Partition drove a ping pong ball size hole through the bear that exit through the shoulder. Impressive! And accurate! It is my go bullet when my shots will be less then 200 yards in the 30-06.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Link: http://www.midwayusa.com/viewProduct/?productNumber=427028

Do you define this result marginal??? :what::eek:
 
Saturno_v,

What I don't think you're considering objectively is:

- Brown Bears skewed this question. I'm sure you've heard the expression 'Big Five', and have some familiarity with hunting is Africa. I would consider a costal brown bear dangerous game. Personally, I'd consider a Kodiak more dangerously capable than a lion. In Africa, most countries have a MINIMUM cartridge bore/caliber requirement of .375. (Some specifically have exceptions listed for 9.3x62.)

- I think everbody would consider .30-06 a fine rifle/hunting cartridge 'for all North American game, with the exception of great bears. (If it wasn't a 'Rifle' Forum, a 12 Ga. shotgun would probably be the most flexible tool, with a caveat on range.) If the question was posed that way, personally, I'd have chosen .270 Win, for IME, it handles light bullets better, as a rule, than the '06.

- Many, and I for one, simply consider various cartridge offerings, different tools for different jobs. Given the context that we get to pick, based on personal preference, we're more inclined to choose cartridges with chamberings not necessarily in our gunsafes. (Although I do have a CZ550 FS in 9.3x62, my reccomendation, in my gunsafe.)

- Tales of 06'(s) taking brown bears are commonplace. Jack Oconnor even took a brownie with a .270. That doesn't make it ideal.

- Considering an '06 a DGR is a little on the optimistic side. Would you consider standard DGR chamberings (like the .458 Win Mag, the .416, the Lott, and the Nitro Express cartridges) UNSUITED to DGR?

- We've all heard/saw folks that had too much gun for them to shoot. That doesn't preclude the fact that others have no issue with it. .30-06 is probably a cartridge EVERYBODY can shoot without flinching, which is a plus for it. That doesn't mean the other tools/options should be eliminated from consideration.

- Dangerous game cartridges DO have advantages over an '06. Would you deny that, for example, a .375 H&H loaded with solids (as DGRs are in Africa) would be more likely to: fulfill a bear hunting goal of breaking both of a bears shoulders...or...be less likely to be deflected on their path to vitals by hitting bone?

- Where is the rule that a bit more power is a bad thing? (I guess that could come from the poll, but assuming great bears were the question.) Note that you claimed my perspective was overkill, but I had merely chosen two cartridges that I can create from your .30-06 brass: .35 Whelen or 9.3x62. Not much more recoil, significantly more power. I'm basically just necking-up your brass to .35 or .366.)

Chris S. of Juneau, AK

Date posted: 8/23/2003

This bullet is truly a heavy weight performer king when it come to 30 cal. bullets. I took a nice 7 1/2 ft brown bear with this bullet in 30-06 (2550 fps) that was causing trouble around are camp near Yakutat, AK. the fall of 2001. Shot was taken at 40 yards broadside chest through the right shoulder. Dropped the bear in his tracks. The Nosler 220 Partition drove a ping pong ball size hole through the bear that exit through the shoulder. Impressive! And accurate! It is my go bullet when my shots will be less then 200 yards in the 30-06.

With respect to that Midway review as anything telling: Consider the points above, and that it was a small brown bear shot from an ideal angle. Coastal brownies can get 10ft or greater.

Perhaps I'm smitten with what I read, beyond Midways' site. For another perspective read: 'The Last Ivory Hunter' by Capstick, which is a true story of Walter Wally Johnson. True: it's not about hunting great bears, but goes beyond hunting elephants, and has a lot of good stories about what can go wrong hunting dangerous game. (There was a good story in there, as well, about a lady hunting Cape Buffalo, and lion, with a 7x57, pretty much making your point that a lesser cartridge can work. I don't think you'd read this an conclude it is ideal though.) Another good read would be 'Safari' by Capstick, that specifically has a chapter on DGR(s), and conclusions by the author, based on his experience.

Overall, this thread, solicited choices in tools. You pick yours, we'll pick ours.
 
As deer have been taken with a .223 it isn't my first choice for them nor is a .308/.30/06 the ideal thing for Grizzly/Brown bear...

I don't want to have to make my shots fit an underpowered rifle, not do I want the chance of wounding a big bear or not cleanly killing any other animal I'm hunting and in Alaska (and elsewhere) that means moose and other regions elk...

I also want something that is flat shooting that I may take a sheep or goat or antelope with it at distance and above all I don't want to fear flinching every time I pull the trigger from excessive recoil...

I would nominate any of the .300 magnums, H&H, Win Mag, WSM, RUM with a second choice the 8mm Rem Mag (.323) that Jarrett created and finally the .340 Weatherby -- one of my true favourite do everything calibers...Anothe choice would be the 9.3x62mm (.366)
 
RugerOldArmy

You are absolutely right that a big Brownie is a tougher and bigger animal than a Lion.

Many expert African hunters consider the legal minimum 375 H&H in some countries for lions, quite honestly, ridiculous....Rhino and Elephant it's another story...

There is DGR and DGR....a Lion is a soft skinned 500 lb max animal...An Elephant is a thick skinned 13.000 lb animal.....

Of course they can show an incredible will and determination to live but...they are still a 500 lb max thin skinned animals....an '06 with the proper load can get to the CNS (the only real assured charge stopper) from any angle at typical charging distance....heck, some heavy premium 30-06 loads would pass Simba from brisket to butt at very short range...rage, adrenaline, everything you want....but the size and body structure is what it is....

Yes more power can be useful...but not as much as many believe....and the advantage can be voided by less accuracy because of heavy recoil (if you cannot shoot them as comfortably as you would do with a lesser caliber)

H&H Hunter put it perfectly..."In my case I shoot a 375 H&H comfortably and easily as I shoot a 22......" more power to him...but some sunday hunters are literally scared to fire their own big boomer rifles....

Of course big calibers have their place and are called for in a lot of situations...but what bothers me (not too much anymore anyway...) is the occasinal nonsensical ignorance (even here on THR) when someone call a 30-06 or a 30-30 a pea shooter....

A charging elephant with a 30-06 is a very different thing...you have to go through enormous bones, incredibly thick skin and so on....power makes a lot of difference...shooting angles makes a lot of difference....when we talk about Rhino or big Dumbo, a stout 30-06 load may be able to get to the vitals from certain angles in certain conditions....in others the bullet may just lodge in layers of fat and/or bones...but lions with a tough heavy 06 bullets at 40 yards??? pick up basically any angle and the bullet would shatter everything on its path.....

If that Midwayusa comment is to be believed, by the behaviour of the bullet I do not think it would have made much difference if the bear was a bit bigger...it seems to me that shot put down that bear with authority...at that distance a properly built and heavy 06 bullet would get into the vitals or CNS no matter what....

Finally I would agree that a shotgun with Brenneke Black Magic 3", Dixie Slugs or similar is the most effective bear stopper out there for ther money.....I would take my $200 Mossberg pump stuffed with 6 Brenneke thumpers than any bolt action is any exotic African calibers, 30-06, 338, whatever, any time fo the day for bear stopping purpose...

And actually, for purely defense purpose, this is the suggestion of many AK guides: Shotguns + Brenneke.
 
Last edited:
Re choosing a 12 gauge for hunting all N. American big game, I find myself in agreement with Chuck Hawks:
Shotgun slug loads intended to be fired from smooth bore barrels manage to combine the worst properties of any hunting projectile: marginal accuracy, low velocity, low sectional density, low ballistic coefficient, rainbow trajectory, and heavy recoil. Nearly the worst of all possible worlds!
 
.30-06


I did a once in a lifetime hunt in South Africa about 10 years ago. Only hunted plains game ranging from Bush Buck to Eland. The recommended caliber for this hunt was .375 H&H, .338, or .340 Weatherby. I chose the .340 Weatherby and took a 30-06 as a back up rifle. In day 5 of a 14 day hunt, my rifle was dropped in the rocks and the scope damaged beyond repair. I used the 30-06 the rest of the hunt.

While the .340 WM defintely did its job, so did the 30-06. I used handloads using 200 grain nosler partitions. It performed perfectly and I could not ask for more, nor need more cartridge. The last animal I shot was a large Zebra. 280 yard shot. When they cleaned it, they found the perfectly mushroomed nosler partition bullet just inside the hide on the opposite side of the body in the shoulder. I have been sold on the 30-06 since then and it is now my only hunting cartridge.

The 30-06 cartridge has ultimate availibilty just about anywhere on the planet, OKA 7.62 x 63, is a handloaders dream easily handling a wide range of bullets up to 220 grains, it is accurate, and it is boringly reliable. It has been doing its job well for over 100 years. You can not go wrong with the 30-06.

If I lived in Grizzly country though, I would opt for the .375 H&H for safe measure.

Thats incredible !
 
4 or 6 or 8 or 10 or 12 bore rifle
Yes, as well as 2 Bore...but that doesn't change the fact that none of the above are calibers.

EDIT to Add: The caliber is a unit of measurement of the bore's diameter (typ. in inches or millimeters), a bore/gauge is the number of projectiles (typ. refers to round lead balls) per pound.
 
Last edited:
I would choose a 30-06 for all around hunting although it would not be ideal for large bear. However I would choose that over a 270. In my thoughts I would break it up with a 243 and a 338 for my TWO choices and be lots happier with that decision.
 
When I started this thread I figured it would be a hit. Man was I right. It seems that a lot of threads have been opinionated around killing the big bad bear and larger game, but that technically wasn't the question. No the 270 wouldn't be my first choice to take a brownie, but it is certainly not incapable of handling the job. From squirrels, rabbits, pigs, cats, coyote, deer, pronghorn, bears etc I still have to say the 270 would be the best. The larger calibers offer the security when handling very large game, but as for the rest of wild life it's just overkill. Anyways everyone has their own opinion and that’s what makes us different.
 
Quote:
Maverick223 -- Quote:
12 gauge
Not a caliber.

Sorry, but have you ever heard of a 4 or 6 or 8 or 10 or 12 bore rifle?

Quote:
4 or 6 or 8 or 10 or 12 bore rifle

Yes, as well as 2 Bore...but that doesn't change the fact that none of the above are calibers.

EDIT to Add: The caliber is a unit of measurement of the bore's diameter (typ. in inches or millimeters), a bore/gauge is the number of projectiles (typ. refers to round lead balls) per pound.

While we're splitting hairs, 'caliber' isn't a correct term either. .30-06, for example, is a 'cartridge', one may say 'chambering', but is .308 'caliber'. The only thing is that 'caliber' is so misused in this way, most folks know what you mean. What drives me nuts, however, is when you're reading posts on the reloading forum, where folks ask about reloading '7mm' or '.308'. You're not always going to get good info, making such a mistake.

Bore designations DO imply caliber. As stated, it came from the blackpowder days, and referred to the 'caliber' of a pure lead (always) ball/sphere, if there were <bore #> to-a-pound balls.

I shot a 4-bore replica (Dutch Roer) ivory-hunting-era muzzleloader with a 1700 Gr patched round ball, over 400-ish Gr FFg, once. I'd not do it again. ;)

I can't even imagine a shooting a 2 bore. :what:
 
30-06

my vote is for the 30-06. Truth be known, Jack O'connor admitted that the 30-06 was more versatile than his beloved 270 Win. I've never felt undergunned with mine. I'm really tired of hearing about the short mags, magnum, etc. We have a syndrome here in Texas, and I see it a lot. It's called the iron deer syndrome. Hunters miss their game, or make bad shots and blame it on the caliber, then they go out and by a MAGNUM. Give me a break!!!! I'll get off my soap box now.
 
338 Win Mag

The 338 Win Mag,

185 to 250 grains covers everything from Whitetail to Polar bear.

Elmer Keith loved it and so do I.
 
the iron deer syndrome. Hunters miss their game, or make bad shots and blame it on the caliber, then they go out and by a MAGNUM.

hehehe... I was commenting on this very phenomenon in a previous post.

This is an excellent way to acquire new rifles from the 'under gunned' crowd.

Burning more powder is not the fix for shoddy marksmanship!:neener:

:D

PS.... I think I already said... but for an 'all' around cartridge'.... 30-06
...and we are getting off on the 'big ol' bar' thing again... OP asks.. "all around rifle" and there it goes to the bear rifle.

Are we to presume that IF your caliber/cartridge selection can extinguish the big bad bear then it can take care of anything else... now that is conceded!

A rifle possessing 'all around' qualities will fall somewhat short on two ends of the spectrum.

Being over powered for the one end of the spectrum, and underpowered for the other end.
But be able to handle the task, no matter what end of the scale.
 
Last edited:
Since I reload I would pick my Rem 8mm mag. I can down loaded for deer or up load it for moose or bear.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top