If you thought "hate crime" laws were nutty before this ...

Status
Not open for further replies.

jimpeel

Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Messages
2,998
Location
Kimball, NE
SOURCE

Bid to include unborn children under hate crimes law derails vote

BY LESLIE REED

WORLD-HERALD BUREAU
LINCOLN - A legislative effort to preserve Nebraska's hate crimes law got derailed Wednesday by a Lincoln lawmaker's efforts to include unborn children under its protection.

State Sen. Mike Foley of Lincoln is emerging as one of the Legislature's most vocal abortion opponents. He raised the abortion-related issue one day after he won first-round passage of another abortion-related bill.

His tactic prompted another lawmaker to object that Foley injects abortion politics into too many issues.

"I've reached the saturation point," said Sen. Pat Bourne of Omaha. "Not everything is pro-life or pro-choice."

Foley denied that he was raising abortion at every opportunity.

"I'm not trying to dominate the session," he said. "But it comes up. It is one of the issues of the day. You don't need to run from it."

Since 1997, Nebraska has had a law allowing judges to impose stiffer penalties for crimes motivated by race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, sexual orientation, age or disability.

But the hate crime law is in jeopardy because of U.S. Supreme Court rulings that juries, not judges, should decide whether a crime contains factors warranting harsher punishment.

State Sen. Kermit Brashear of Omaha introduced Legislative Bill 270 last year to fix the hate crimes law. During debate Wednesday, he also hoped to include legislation to carry out Nebraska's victims' rights amendment, passed by voters in 1996 but never implemented by the Legislature.

But Foley's maneuver meant Brashear couldn't bring the measure to a vote Wednesday morning. It's not known when the hate crimes bill will return to the agenda.

Sen. Ray Mossey of Sarpy County, a former Omaha police officer, said the hate crimes law change is needed.

He told of anti-Semitic vandalism of an Omaha synagogue and a cross-burning at the home of a northwest Omaha family.

"The look on that family's face, on their children's faces, when that cross burned on their front yard," Mossey said. "That crime would not have been committed if that family had not been African-American. It's not right."

Foley said he opposes the hate crimes law because it attempts to say some crimes are "extra wrong" because of what the perpetrator might have been thinking.

But Foley said he would suppress those objections if other lawmakers would accept his "reasonable offer" to include unborn children in the hate crimes law.

Brashear rejected the offer. He said his bill was intended only to remedy problems with existing laws, not to raise new issues.
 
State Sen. Kermit Brashear of Omaha introduced Legislative Bill 270 last year to fix the hate crimes law.
Note how they can never bring themselves to repeal a law. They just keep trying to unscrew the last screwup with a new screwup.
Foley said he opposes the hate crimes law because it attempts to say some crimes are "extra wrong" because of what the perpetrator might have been thinking.
Well, he got this part right. Legislatures should not be in the business of Clairvoyance. Thought crimes legislation should be outlawed.
 
Last edited:
Hate crime:

The stunning proposition that criminal predation performed in silence, or against white anglo saxon protestant males is morally superior to those same crimes performed with verbal invectives or against non wasp males.
 
I'm with you, Geek.
Justice is supposed to be blind to race, creed, color, or sex.
If you have to pass some kind of an idiot law like a "hate crime" law in order for you to have justice, you have a lot more problems which need to be dealt with, and passing a stupid law ain't gonna fix it.

You would think some of these legislators would figure this out, but apparently not, as we have tens of thousands of gun laws from the commie-nazi feel do gooders as it is, and they want to make more.
 
The most important portion of the story ...

But the hate crime law is in jeopardy because of U.S. Supreme Court rulings that juries, not judges, should decide whether a crime contains factors warranting harsher punishment.
It is through their meddling, with the creation of new crimes and classes of crimes, that they have placed in jeopardy hundreds of cases which were enhanced through this bogus legislation.

Every case that was decided by a judge who placed enhancements on the defendant are now going to be thrown out; and the best they propose to do is to "fix it".

The inmates surely do run the asylum.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top