ol' scratch
Member
I will chime in. I love to hunt. However, it takes time. More time than I have right now. It also takes equipment I can't store (duck hunter). I typically hunt in Northern Michigan when I can because I don't have to worry about being rained with shot. There is also much more sky busting down here and morons who threaten you if you are infringing on "their" spot. I love to shoot and am looking at compitition shooting which does take time, but is much easier. I also know what it is like to be strapped for cash and wanting to fund my hobby. I started selling scrap and buying and selling antiques. I have built a nice collection doing this and am proud to say I haven't used family funds to purchase a firearm since 2008. Is what I have done any different than hunting to support my hobby?
I think it is wrong to put more emphisis on hunting and less on shooting. It is what people who are trying to divide the issue are trying to do. How many times have we heard some supposed gun prohibitionist say they support hunting, but don't support owning ammunition used in target shooting? Frankly, I am sick of some hunters who are so close-minded they can only see what they want. They did it in the 1990's, they are trying it again.
All that said, I still think the zombie thing is a little strange, but if someone wants to pursue it and they are safe, I have no problem with it.
I think it is wrong to put more emphisis on hunting and less on shooting. It is what people who are trying to divide the issue are trying to do. How many times have we heard some supposed gun prohibitionist say they support hunting, but don't support owning ammunition used in target shooting? Frankly, I am sick of some hunters who are so close-minded they can only see what they want. They did it in the 1990's, they are trying it again.
All that said, I still think the zombie thing is a little strange, but if someone wants to pursue it and they are safe, I have no problem with it.
Last edited: