• You are using the old High Contrast theme. We have installed a new dark theme for you, called UI.X. This will work better with the new upgrade of our software. You can select it at the bottom of any page.

In case you haven't had enough DiFi

Status
Not open for further replies.

Boats

member
Joined
Dec 29, 2002
Messages
3,705
Location
Oregon
Here is her take, straight from her Senate Webpages:

Today, we saw the ideological and extreme view of the National Rifle Association, where they sacrificed their most wanted legislative priority here – the gun immunity legislation – because the Senate approved three amendments that would save people's lives: amendments to extend the assault weapons ban, close the gun show loophole, and require trigger locks. I am a bit numb, and I find what happened today bizarre.

It is hard for me to understand why the NRA did what they did in terms of sending out an email to the U.S. Senate in the middle of deliberations. I've got to hand them some credit, because clearly they had the power to turn around at least 60 votes of the U.S. Senate with a third of a page print on an email, but it is not for the benefit of the majority of the American people.

I thought the gun immunity bill was a deeply flawed bill. It gave something to the gun industry that it shouldn't have, that no other industry in America has, and that is why I voted against it.

As far as the assault weapons legislation, I will come back and come back and come back again, because this has been a ten-year crusade for me to get this done and to keep it done. We are going to persevere. People don't know me very well if they think I am going to drop out along the way.

What this has clearly done is escalated this to the Presidential campaign issue. President Bush said he would sign the reauthorization of the assault weapons ban in his last campaign. And we hold him to that pledge.

If it weren't for the fact that President Bush had said that he would sign a straight reauthorization, we would have put in a stronger bill. We now know how to make it stronger.

If we come back and come back and cannot achieve a straight reauthorization and this becomes part of a Presidential campaign and our side wins the Presidential campaign, you can be sure the legislation will pass in the next session.
 
Of course she is so clueless as to still have this enjoyable tidbit up too.

“This is a tremendous day,†Senator Feinstein said . “It was an uphill battle, but it was a battle worth fighting. The NRA went all out to repeal this legislation, and we won. I feel exactly like I did in 1993. Once in a while, when you have something in which you deeply believe, and that something is made into law and sustained, it is so elating and so important.

I deeply believe that assault weapons don't belong on the streets of our communities. The bill we drafted banned the manufacture and sale of assault weapons. It also banned the manufacture of the big clips, drums or strips, which make them so dangerous. The aim was to dry up the supply of these weapons over time -- and the ban has worked. It has reduced the proportion of banned weapons used in crime by two-thirds.

In the past few days, we've heard horror stories about the gun industry planning to put bayonet mounts and grenade launchers and flash suppressers back on the market again. This would have been terrible.

I want to thank all the Senators that voted for this amendment and all the cosponsors that helped secure victory. It would not have happened if we had not acted as a team.

I want to particularly thank Senator Warner. Senator Warner voted against the ban 10 years ago, but had the good judgment to see that the ban has worked, that law enforcement supports it, and to understand what would happen if this ban were repealed.

I also want to thank Senator Schumer. Senator Schumer was on the Judiciary Committee in the House when this came up in 1993. I asked him if he would take the bill that I had introduced and try to shepherd it through the House. He did that, which was no small accomplishment.

Now, the key is to keep the extension of the ban in the gun immunity bill. We should not go to conference on this bill, until there is a commitment that the assault weapons legislation will be part of a final gun immunity bill. We have a commitment from Minority Leader, Senator Daschle, to assure that that's the case.

The issue is now clearly joined, and I believe the overwhelming number of the American people want this assault weapons legislation continued for another ten years. At the end of the road, I hope that we will have achieved that.â€

Extension of the assault weapons ban enjoys broad support:

• President Bush supports the extension of the ban : In April 2003, White House spokesman Scott McClellan said of the assault weapons ban, "The president supports the current law, and he supports reauthorization of the current law."

• Extension of the ban is widely supported by gun owning and non-gun owning voters. According to an October poll (sample size – 800) conducted for Americans for Gun Safety by Mark Penn, voters support renewing the ban by a margin of 77-21% (66-32% among voters who own guns).

Law enforcement organizations support the extension:

• Fraternal Order of Police
• International Association of Chiefs of Police
• The Major Cities Chiefs
• The National Association of Police Organizations
• The National Organization of Black Law Enforcement
• The International Brotherhood of Police Officers
• The Hispanic American Police Command Officers Association
• The American Probation and Parole Association

The ban also has broad support in the community:

• National League of Cities
• US Conference of Mayors
• National Association of Counties
• US Conference of Catholic Bishops
• National Education Association
• American Bar Association
• NAACP
• Americans for Gun Safety
• Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence United with the Million Mom March
• Church Women United
• Episcopal Church, USA
• American Academy of Family Physicians
• American Public Health Association
• Family Violence Prevention Fund
• National Coalition Against Domestic Violence
• National Network to End Domestic Violence
• National Association of Public Hospitals and Health Systems
• National Association of Social Workers
• Physicians for a Violence Free Society
• American Association of Suicidology
• Mothers Against Violence in America
• Child Welfare League of America
• Alliance for Justice

Legislation to reauthorize the assault weapons ban is cosponsored by Senators Mike DeWine (R-OH), Lincoln Chafee (R-RI), Carl Levin (D-MI), Christopher Dodd (D-CT), James Jeffords (I-VT), Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.), Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ), Jack Reed (D-RI), Hillary Clinton (D-NY) and Barbara Mikulski (D-MD).
 
Alright.. that #$%$^ has to go. She's obviously a true believer/crusader. I truly think that once she's down (as well as Schumer, but I know west coast doinks more than east coast)... the tide against us will get better. I think lots of people might share her beliefs, but very few have the just plain irrational vendetta that drives her to persecute us.

So.. what can we do? What allies can we make?

The anti-war folks are upset with her for profiteering:
http://www.thetip.org/art_Feinstein_Joins_Hawks_in_War_Profiteering_333_icle.html

Heck, even Aztlan hates her:
http://aztlan.net/ucregents.htm

And there's a whole raft of allegations here:
http://www.calfraud.com/trails/feintrail.htm


Can anyone confirm or deny this material?
Is there a possibility of an alliance with someone?

IIRC, she's up for re-election in 2006 -- how can that be scuttled? Better yet, is there a possibility of a "Jim March and the MMM" legal snafu that can get passed up the wire to take her down earlier?

At the very least, if she and her staff are concentrating on the defensive, it's that much less people and treasure they have for coming after us, right?

Wars aren't won on the defensive. :)

-K
 
Did somebody mention Feinswine?

15390.jpg




:evil:
 
I just wish some fearless reporter would ask Sen. Feinstein at a press conference, "Senator Feinstien, are you in possession of a permit to carry a concealed handgun? If so, are you carriyng a concealed handgun?

Ms. Feinstein, how can you protect yourself from violent attack yet demand ordinary citizens remain defenseless in the face of that same violence?"

Every time that woman start bloviating over gun control that question ought to be thrown out on the table.
 
WARNING. Links lead to material that Art's Grahmaw wouldn't like.

Who is Art's Grandma? Why have I started using that phrase?

It isn't exactly THR material, but I did get a chuck out of it.

Dianne Feinstein is an Idiot T-shirt:
http://www.sethreads.com/Merchant2/..._Code=st&Product_Code=POL01&Category_Code=POL

F--- Dianne Feinestein T-shirt:
http://www.sethreads.com/Merchant2/merchant.mv?Screen=PROD&Store_Code=st&Product_Code=PRO02

Yes, Dianne spells with with two n's. I keep making the one-n mistake myself.

Maybe they'll make a "Diane Feinstein is a Traitor to the US Constitution". That's the real reason we don't like her, and it has a THR acceptable message I think.
 
In the past few days, we've heard horror stories about the gun industry planning to put bayonet mounts and grenade launchers and flash suppressers back on the market again. This would have been terrible.
I saw this and I said to myself, "Ahh, he's just making this up; nobody's that much of an idiot." Then I checked her web site... and she really said it!! She's afraid of bayonet lugs and flash suppressors????


Edit to fix my misspelling of "suppressors" (I copied DiFi's misspelling).
 
Last edited:
In the past few days, we've heard horror stories about the gun industry planning to put bayonet mounts and grenade launchers and flash suppressers back on the market again. This would have been terrible.
What the..wait..i dont..what?

So if the law had passed these items would have been legal again, eh. She's freaking senile.
 
In the past few days, we've heard horror stories about the gun industry planning to put bayonet mounts and grenade launchers and flash suppressers back on the market again. This would have been terrible.

She still does not get it. The flash hider does not make the rifle more deadly, nor does the bayonet lug. However, the grenade launcher could be an issue :scrutiny: AFter 10 years of shaping the argument, you would think that her spinmeisters could at least study the subject :rolleyes:

I deeply believe that assault weapons don't belong on the streets of our communities.

I travel alot, and to some unsavory areas. I have yet to see an evil assault weapon roaming around the streets, even with a human escort. :rolleyes:

She is the High Priestess of the Enemies of Freedom.
 
I would say Upchuck Schumer, but his balls are in a jar somewhere. :uhoh:

I guess it will be a fight between the two Senators from Mass.

Bill Lockyer in California is an upwardly mobile minion.

DeWine of Ohio is lost in the catacombs.
 
However, the grenade launcher could be an issue

Upon first inspection, it'd seem like this grenade launcher ban makes sense.

However, if I'm not mistaken the "grenade" launchers they speak of (and that I so dearly want... for some unknown reson) is really just a 37mm generic launcher. Kind of like a flare gun. Actually, it is a flare gun. It's just far easier to get your "flare" where you want it when it's on a nice long rifle and has a good sighting system.

The safety flare devices that boaters keep in case of emergency are just the "spray from the hip" kind. You don't need to aim those kind.

Sorry, couldn't resist.

At any rate, the launcher isn't regulated in the least bit, except by the 1994 AWB bill. Actual grenade rounds are a horrible no-no unless you want to pay that $200 tax (I'm not sure if that's PER ROUND or not!) and get licensed to reload your own desctructive devices. The round is a DD, the launcher is not.

Perfectly legal to fire smoke rounds out of them though or duds for practice. I have no idea if you can load up your own pepper spray bombs or not, or if that's even considered a good idea. Might have been a great tool for the Korean shop keepers during the riots.

Like I said, I kind of want to get one of the "Huh, neat" factor of it. Just not sure if I want to get a new "no-ban" upper and the launcher for my AR or just toss it on my AK. The Bushmaster Dissapator upper I've got right now most likely has no room for the launcher to attach. 20" barrel, flash supressor, bayonet lug, grenade launcher... hey, thanks for the shopping list DiFi! You left out the telescoping stock though!
 
Boats, I gotta learn to avoid threads like this before coffee in the morning.

I swear that woman is like a red cape in a bull arena.

GigaBuist, thanks for the link, I ordered the non "adult only" content shirt, and be wearing it to a local range as soon as it gets here.
 
Dang it, Mr. Markowitz, i'm sending ya the bill for a coffe & :barf: -soaked monitor/keyboard
 
I always wondered about the grenade launcher bit . . .

She's putting on a brave face as can be expected, but I still think her best chance to renew the ban just went down in flames. So let's keep up the fire, and keep Feinstein away from our rights.

Now look at the gif below and tell me Dianne doesn't remind you of someone from the last scene of AOD.

aaodend.gif
 
Feinstein really, really annoys me. And so I make this pledge:

For every time she introduces any sort of renewal, re-authorization, permanentization, or strengthening of the AWB, I will buy another firearm. It won't neccessarily be and EBR or even anything semi-auto or able to take magazines over 10 rounds. But I will buy another gun.

And I will send a check to the NRA-ILA and/or the GOA. Maybe even the PRK branch of the NRA (the name escapes me at the moment-I don't live there).

And I will send a picture of myself, my new gun, and a photocopy of the check(s) to her.

Just so she knows.
 
For every time she introduces any sort of renewal, re-authorization, permanentization, or strengthening of the AWB, I will buy another firearm. It won't neccessarily be and EBR or even anything semi-auto or able to take magazines over 10 rounds. But I will buy another gun.

You must be independently wealthy! :D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top