Some worthy in the Ann Coulter ban/boycott/whatever thread linked to The 100 Most Frequently Challenged Books of 1990–2000.
I mashed the link to see just what books were on "the list."
Yes, indeed, there were 100 books listed.
What is more interesting is the link, Challenges by Initiator.
Delving into the data lead me to some conclusions:
1. Despite all the breathless verbiage about "censorship" and "book bans," there are relatively few challenges, let alone actual bans, and no censorship.
2. Oddly, the American Library Association does not understand what censorship really is, given their quotation of Judy Blume on the top of the web page:
(Yeah, folks in the USA quiver in fear that the book cops are gonna bust down thier doors for writing inane tracts in support of the secularist, leftist viewpoint currently ascendant in the culture. Let the Utne Reader subscriber base quiver in their hemp trousers!)
3. The overwhelming majority of challenges originate in the public school system (71%). The second largest portion originated in the public libraries (24%).
4. At least 95% (71% + 24%) of the "challenges" are perfectly legitimate political footballs to be kicked around, since the books in question were to be bought with taxpayer dollars.
Which brings me to my point:
If a book is being bought with taxpayer dollars and some taxpayer challenges the expenditure for that book, it is not censorship.
If someone can't get the local taxpayer's representatives to buy "Heather Has Two Mommies" for the public elementary school library, they can always buy it and warp their kids' minds on their own dime.
Note: I do not support the current gov't school system setup. If we want to spend taxpayer dollars on educating the young, give their folks a voucher & let the market fill the need. Until this is the reality, taxpayers ought to have a say in how their taxes are spent.
I mashed the link to see just what books were on "the list."
Yes, indeed, there were 100 books listed.
What is more interesting is the link, Challenges by Initiator.
Delving into the data lead me to some conclusions:
1. Despite all the breathless verbiage about "censorship" and "book bans," there are relatively few challenges, let alone actual bans, and no censorship.
Between 1990 and 2000, of the 6,364 challenges reported to or recorded by the Office for Intellectual Freedom
2. Oddly, the American Library Association does not understand what censorship really is, given their quotation of Judy Blume on the top of the web page:
Judy Blume (Bold face by jfruser) said:t’s not just the books under fire now that worry me. It is the books that will never be written. The books that will never be read. And all due to the fear of censorship. As always, young readers will be the real losers.
(Yeah, folks in the USA quiver in fear that the book cops are gonna bust down thier doors for writing inane tracts in support of the secularist, leftist viewpoint currently ascendant in the culture. Let the Utne Reader subscriber base quiver in their hemp trousers!)
3. The overwhelming majority of challenges originate in the public school system (71%). The second largest portion originated in the public libraries (24%).
Seventy-one percent of the challenges were to material in schools or school libraries. Another twenty-four percent were to material in public libraries (down two percent since 1999). Sixty percent of the challenges were brought by parents, fifteen percent by patrons, and nine percent by administrators, both down one percent since 1999.
4. At least 95% (71% + 24%) of the "challenges" are perfectly legitimate political footballs to be kicked around, since the books in question were to be bought with taxpayer dollars.
Which brings me to my point:
If a book is being bought with taxpayer dollars and some taxpayer challenges the expenditure for that book, it is not censorship.
If someone can't get the local taxpayer's representatives to buy "Heather Has Two Mommies" for the public elementary school library, they can always buy it and warp their kids' minds on their own dime.
Note: I do not support the current gov't school system setup. If we want to spend taxpayer dollars on educating the young, give their folks a voucher & let the market fill the need. Until this is the reality, taxpayers ought to have a say in how their taxes are spent.