Interesting take on Hamas ceasefire decision

Status
Not open for further replies.

Preacherman

Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2002
Messages
13,306
Location
Louisiana, USA
From the Telegraph, London (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/mai...27.xml&sSheet=/news/2003/06/27/ixnewstop.html), this journalist has an interesting perspective on what's forcing Hamas to the negotiating table:

Hamas leaders caught off guard by Bush's divine mission
By Alan Philps in Jerusalem
(Filed: 27/06/2003)

Something radical has changed in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The change is not the views of the Israeli top brass, who still believe in using an iron fist. It is not in the minds of the Palestinian extremists who send young men to blow themselves up inside Israel; they still believe in eternal struggle.

How then to explain the fact that Hamas, the Islamic extremist movement, is preparing to sign a three-month truce, obliging it to stop attacks on Israeli soldiers and civilians?

In return for accepting what Palestinians widely see as a "surrender document", Hamas will get almost nothing from the Israelis, not even a promise that the lives of its leadership will be secure.

The change is not on the ground, but 5,900 miles away, in the mind of President George W Bush. He told the new Palestinian prime minister, Mahmoud Abbas, earlier this month that bringing peace to the Middle East was a "divine mission" for him.

The Palestinians were astonished at these words - the last they expected to hear from a US president.

Mr Bush's divine mission is gathering strength, and all the Arab leaders are scrambling to avoid being trampled by the diplomatic and military juggernaut. The most scared of all are the Syrians, whose capital, Damascus, has been the home of the exiled leaders of Hamas and Islamic Jihad.

With American troops in Iraq on its eastern frontier, Syria is coming under intolerable pressure to heed American wishes and send radical Palestinian leaders away. The fact Washington has offered no explanation - let alone an apology - for a raid on June 19 in which five border guards were wounded and taken away is the clearest indication that the US is no respecter of Syrian sovereignty.

The exiled leaders of Hamas and Islamic Jihad, Khaled Mashal and Ramadan Shallah, have been moved from their Damascus offices to a Palestinian refugee camp. Their next stop would most likely be Beirut - within range of the Israeli air force and Mossad hit squads. Even the compliant Lebanese might want to move them on but where to? No Arab country dares provide a haven.

That is why, according to Palestinian officials, the exiled leadership has all but signed the ceasefire proposal. The local leadership in Gaza is resisting this decision, which they see as a surrender of fundamental principles. If God has decreed there should be no Jewish state in the Middle East, they argue, who has the right to declare a truce?

"The exiled leadership sees the regional picture, which is not at all favourable," said a diplomat. "The local leadership sees things differently. From their perspective, their popularity is growing at an unprecedented rate. Why give up the struggle while the Israeli army is not even being forced to withdraw to positions it held in September 2000, or to release Palestinian prisoners?"

So much American prestige is at stake that Hamas will most likely knuckle down and accept the three-month truce ahead of a visit to the region this weekend by Condoleezza Rice, Mr Bush's National Security Adviser.

This, however, is just the first of many steps. The Israelis dismiss any truce as a sham, and are demanding that Mr Abbas's Palestinian Authority set about disarming Hamas.

This is unlikely to happen. Mr Abbas says he wants to unify Palestinian ranks, not cause civil war by acting as Israel's policeman - a role he is too weak to carry out. The second stage - the dismantling of Hamas - will mark the point when Mr Bush's divine mission collides with the dark realities on the ground.
 
Throughout our current war Bush has gone completely out of his way to avoid using religious imagery except for his first comments right after the 911 hit on NY where he used the term "crusade." Since then he made a practice of avoid comments that could be put into a religious context. . . . to the point of misstating the obvious.

Now all of a sudden he changes tactics and begins using religious terms right squarely in the face of the most religiously tender space on the planet. I doubt it.

No, what I think has happened is he looked the Palestanian leadership in the eye and told them not to screw around with him. He just completed busting Iraq early in the first quarter. He had suficient forces on the Syrian border to make short work of Syria and Lebanon. That is important because all logistic and command support for the Palestanian movement comes out of Iran through Syria.

I think Bush played hardball and they believed him. Combine Bush's bad cop stance with Israel's psychopathic hatred and rage toward terrorist actions and you have an effective tag team.

Hamas wanting to impose a three month truce? Why do the dance? All they have to do is nothing and there is a truce. No, I think work is being done behind the scenes and hamas is now under some kind of stress which is making it difficult for them to continue as in the past. Leadership being killed? Supplies being interdicted? Funds cut off? Iran telling them to back down? Something is going on behind the scenes.
 
What scared the crap out of the Arabs was the thought of the US Army, Marines, AF, and Navy, blowing the hell out of the Bekka Vally.....as they should have long ago....and the recent protests in Iran.

Iranians are worried, making the Arabs worried, making Hamas and the other scum do a tactical retreat. Their goal hasn't changed (dead Jews and no Israel), only the timetable.

Sadly the Islamists don't realize that we win....it's in the book.
 
I think Bush played hardball and they believed him. Combine Bush's bad cop stance with Israel's psychopathic hatred and rage toward terrorist actions and you have an effective tag team

That is an odd statement. Why wouldn't the government have a wee bit of anger toward terrorist groups that blow up pizza shops and busses?
 
What scared the crap out of the Arabs was the thought of the US Army, Marines, AF, and Navy, blowing the hell out of the Bekka Vally.....as they should have long ago....and the recent protests in Iran.

I think it's the senate discussion about sending the Army to the Gaza Strip that did it.
I held my breath for a second...:(
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top