Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Iraq's Constitutional Compromise: This Election Won't Count

Discussion in 'Legal' started by bountyhunter, Oct 12, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. bountyhunter

    bountyhunter member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    Messages:
    3,421
    Location:
    Fascist-Fornia
    In an attempt to appease the Sunnis who hold majority in four of the 18 provinces (and hold the power to reject the new constitution by voting it down in any three provinces) a "compromise" has been tabled which will basically make the first constitution null and void two months after it is passed:

    And the whole process simply repeats itself.



    http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/meast/10/12/iraq.main/index.html
     
    Last edited: Oct 12, 2005
  2. BadAsh87

    BadAsh87 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2005
    Messages:
    34
    People must remember that when our country first formed, it took about 10 years to form a solid constitution and government. The articles of confederation was a failure.
     
  3. rick_reno

    rick_reno member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    3,027
    It's probably being done to scam more money from the process. I wouldn't worry about it.
     
  4. Delmar

    Delmar Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    2,052
    Location:
    Cedar Bluff, VA
    I don't think its a scam so much as a feeble attempt at a power grab. The sunni's were the ones in charge prior to the invasion, and they will do anything to keep the country in turmoil until they can figure a way to be in charge once again.
     
  5. El Tejon

    El Tejon Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    18,083
    Location:
    Lafayette, Indiana-the Ned Flanders neighbor to Il
    Hmmm, sort of like the Articles of Confederation and the Continental Congress. Engels was right, history repeats itself.
     
  6. c_yeager

    c_yeager Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2003
    Messages:
    5,479
    Location:
    Seattle
    Well, if the new constitution goes into effect and the Sunnis dont feel like they are being victimized during those two months then i would expect it to be much easier to get them on board for the real deal. Seems like a good idea to me. We are talking about people who dont even have a cultural concept of self-rule. Even we had an idea of what a government *should* be and it took us ten years to get something that worked.
     
  7. wingnutx

    wingnutx Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    1,047
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ
    What this actually does is allow them to make ammendments to the constitution after two months, where previously it had to be in place for 8 years before any ammendment could be made.

    We can make ammendments to ours at any time, and I still think it counts.
     
  8. bountyhunter

    bountyhunter member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    Messages:
    3,421
    Location:
    Fascist-Fornia
    No, the reports I read say what the article says:
    It doesn't say they will have the option to customize it, the reports say it has to be re-written.
     
  9. Beren

    Beren Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    2,388
    Location:
    Pittsburgh, PA
    I'm sure the Iraqis know how to use copy and paste for any sections they don't wish to change.
     
  10. bountyhunter

    bountyhunter member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    Messages:
    3,421
    Location:
    Fascist-Fornia
    Sir, I believe you miss the entire point which is contained in the title of this thread:

    The new constitution is supposed to be the "framing document" for the new country (s) which will be formed. If it is a given that it must be re-written, then it has no actual validity. It is either their constitution or it isn't. In effect, the compromise they reached is:

    We can't get agreement to pass this thing, so just vote for it and we will fix it later.

    The point is, that doesn't get them any farther down the raod than they are right now: fighting over what the constitution must say with no hope of agreement on non-negotiable items like federalism and complete autonomy for the individual "states" within the country which will be "Kurdistan", "Shiiteistan", and "Sunnistan"..... the problem is the land designated for "Sunnistan" doesn't have any oil..... so they will be frozen out of Iraq's wealth.
     
  11. Jim March

    Jim March Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    8,732
    Location:
    SF Bay Area
    The Sunnis don't have oil on their land. They DO however have people with a higher education level. The difference is enough that the combined country actually needs to Sunnis involved.

    What this latest agreement does is makes sure there will be continued discussion, argument, etc. over the constitution.

    While annoying, better that than a shooting war breaks out...
     
  12. longhorngunman

    longhorngunman Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2005
    Messages:
    852
    Compost is just "trolling" like he always does. :rolleyes:
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page