But don't shoot the 5.56 NATO out of a .223 chamber.
Now you've done it. You've opened the can of worms!
thanks for the information . now the issue is finding the ammo. i have called a couple shops and everybody is out of the ammo. does anyone know were i can get the ammo online.
don't forget 223 Wylde, it can shoot all of those as well,5.56 NATO is 5.56x45 is .223 Remington.
If you have a 5.56 chamber you can shoot them all.
There may be overpressure issues, but I can assure you, hundreds of thousands, if not millions of 5.56 NATO spec rounds have been shot through SAAMI spec chambers without ill effect.it is fact
That would assume that anyone cuts a true SAAMI spec .223 chamber. I know of no current production gun that has one. The difference in loading between the 5.56 and .223 loadings combined with the understanding that people are going to shoot the latter because it's available has led pretty much everyone to use a hybrid chamber of some type. Same concept as the Wylde but not the same in most cases. You can get a custom barrel that is a .223 SAAMI spec chamber, but it adds nothing to the equation so why bother.hundreds of thousands, if not millions of 5.56 NATO spec rounds have been shot through SAAMI spec chambers without ill effect.
Before the internet (going back a while) it was not a problem to interchange .223 and 5.56.That would assume that anyone cuts a true SAAMI spec .223 chamber. I know of no current production gun that has one. The difference in loading between the 5.56 and .223 loadings combined with the understanding that people are going to shoot the latter because it's available has led pretty much everyone to use a hybrid chamber of some type. Same concept as the Wylde but not the same in most cases. You can get a custom barrel that is a .223 SAAMI spec chamber, but it adds nothing to the equation so why bother.
Yes it also wasn't a problem to load cartridges that proved later to be on the order of proof loads. Ignorance is bliss, until it isn't.Before the internet (going back a while) it was not a problem to interchange .223 and 5.56.
The other thing to consider is back 30 years ago, you never really saw much of anything heavier than 55gr.I think the issue can be that some 5.56 ammo uses bullets that are so long that they can come into contact with the rifling of a .223 chambered gun which can have a shorter throat.
If the bullet is touching the rifling or close to it before it is fired then the pressure that can build up before it starts making its way down the bore is unacceptable. It needs that little gap to get some velocity before it impacts the rifling. (While too much space can reduce overall accuracy.)
5.56 chambered guns have more throat space.
As a result I really don't think there is any issue at all using 5.56 ammo in .223 guns if you are using ammo that is a similar overall length to .223 ammo.
The ammo is practically the same, and most of the difference in pressure numbers because one is measured in CUP and one in PSI.
However if you are using one of the heavier bullet weights typically only available in 5.56, then you may want to measure the distance in the gun compared to the overall length of the ammo. Insure there is enough space for the bullet to get some velocity before it impacts the rifling.
Those 70+ grain bullets for example can be pretty long and may be unsafe in a SAAMI .223 if they are too close to or in contact with the rifling.