DMK
Member
Is it wise to base your choice of JHP defense ammo on the fact that it has similar ballistic performance to common and cheap FMJ practice ammo?
For sake of argument, here's an example: Say I've decided to use 165gr. Golden Sabers in my CZ40B. However, 180gr. FMJ is much more common than 165gr, FMJ and goes on sale more. Since I don't buy as much 165gr. FMJ because it is not as cheap, I don't practice with this gun all that much, compared to other, cheaper to shoot guns that I own.
One argument for keeping practice and defense ammo similar would be that felt recoil and POI would be the same. With practice, you can predict where those bullets are going to go with better consistency.
On the other hand, perhaps you won't be using the best ammunition available for your gun. Perhaps it's not as accurate. Perhaps it doesn't have the best terminal performance. In essence, you'd be sacrificing some performance for additional consistency.
Any thoughts?
For sake of argument, here's an example: Say I've decided to use 165gr. Golden Sabers in my CZ40B. However, 180gr. FMJ is much more common than 165gr, FMJ and goes on sale more. Since I don't buy as much 165gr. FMJ because it is not as cheap, I don't practice with this gun all that much, compared to other, cheaper to shoot guns that I own.
One argument for keeping practice and defense ammo similar would be that felt recoil and POI would be the same. With practice, you can predict where those bullets are going to go with better consistency.
On the other hand, perhaps you won't be using the best ammunition available for your gun. Perhaps it's not as accurate. Perhaps it doesn't have the best terminal performance. In essence, you'd be sacrificing some performance for additional consistency.
Any thoughts?