This is a serious question. I had a few tiny autos that I would have carried and kept if they worked. The Kel-Tec P-32 comes to mind. If it had been reliable, it would have made a good CCW. When I had it, it was so easy to carry that I actually would carry it with me any and everywhere. It weighed not much more than a pocket knife and it had a clip so I just stuffed it into my pants pocket and clipped it on. It was not reliable so I dumped it.
The thing is, there are times that I don't carry my S&W 642 that I would carry if I had a smaller and lighter gun. Is it better to at least carry a gun even if it may not be reliable rather than go without? What I carry now when I can't carry my S&W 642 or Kahr K-9 is a good knife like a Spyderco Para-Military. It is not a gun but it is much better than nothing. Is a jam-o-matic P-32 better than a knife? What are the pros and cons of that situation? This doesn't have to be about Kel-Tec so if you happen to own a reliable P-32 or P3-AT, good for you. I am trying to say how bad Kel-Tecs are, it is just that they are the perfect weight and size but reliability was the issue for me.
The thing is, there are times that I don't carry my S&W 642 that I would carry if I had a smaller and lighter gun. Is it better to at least carry a gun even if it may not be reliable rather than go without? What I carry now when I can't carry my S&W 642 or Kahr K-9 is a good knife like a Spyderco Para-Military. It is not a gun but it is much better than nothing. Is a jam-o-matic P-32 better than a knife? What are the pros and cons of that situation? This doesn't have to be about Kel-Tec so if you happen to own a reliable P-32 or P3-AT, good for you. I am trying to say how bad Kel-Tecs are, it is just that they are the perfect weight and size but reliability was the issue for me.