Two things influence politics: money, and/or percentage of population. Do you think that the last wave of 'pro-gun' political events (like allowing the AWB to sunset, and more states allowing CCW permits) happened primarily because of the shear number of gun owners, or because of the money they raised through organizations like the NRA and GOA and the lobbyists they supported?
Having heard we crested the 300,000,000 mark got me wondering about how many Americans would be directly effected by a gun ban of any type. Let's assume for a moment that the Democrats take over, and they claim that the the last gun ban had no impact because it was not pervasive enough -- this time, not only are "assault weapons" going to be illegal to purchase, but they will be illegal to own -- no grandfathering. Assuming for a moment that every American who owned an AR, AK, FAL, etc., submitted to the new law and handed over their rifles, how many people would be directly effected by this law?
So my questions really boil down to:
How many gun owners are there in the U.S.?
How many gun owners own guns commonly referred to as "assault weapons"?
How are gun ownership statistics estimated?
Is it our numbers (population) or our money (lobbying) which has the greatest effect on law makers?
(Bonus Question: In the scenario above, how many gun owners would refuse to hand over their guns?)
Apparently some or all of these questions are impossible to accurately calculate, especially and obviously the 'bonus' question. So I'm wondering what statistics exist, and what everyone's best guess would be.
I'm asking these questions because if the gun-owning population is a substantial percentage of the total population, that is a whole different situation than if this is actually a fringe group fighting a battle against perception and propaganda. In reality, I would assume that about 15-20% of the population has at least one gun in their home, and that about 15-20% of the population is adamantly anti-gun, and the rest are somewhere in the middle of the road, and would not vote one way or the other based on this issue. I am guessing the numbers of pro- and anti- are close because if one side were strongly dominant than there wouldn't really be a battle.
Having heard we crested the 300,000,000 mark got me wondering about how many Americans would be directly effected by a gun ban of any type. Let's assume for a moment that the Democrats take over, and they claim that the the last gun ban had no impact because it was not pervasive enough -- this time, not only are "assault weapons" going to be illegal to purchase, but they will be illegal to own -- no grandfathering. Assuming for a moment that every American who owned an AR, AK, FAL, etc., submitted to the new law and handed over their rifles, how many people would be directly effected by this law?
So my questions really boil down to:
How many gun owners are there in the U.S.?
How many gun owners own guns commonly referred to as "assault weapons"?
How are gun ownership statistics estimated?
Is it our numbers (population) or our money (lobbying) which has the greatest effect on law makers?
(Bonus Question: In the scenario above, how many gun owners would refuse to hand over their guns?)
Apparently some or all of these questions are impossible to accurately calculate, especially and obviously the 'bonus' question. So I'm wondering what statistics exist, and what everyone's best guess would be.
I'm asking these questions because if the gun-owning population is a substantial percentage of the total population, that is a whole different situation than if this is actually a fringe group fighting a battle against perception and propaganda. In reality, I would assume that about 15-20% of the population has at least one gun in their home, and that about 15-20% of the population is adamantly anti-gun, and the rest are somewhere in the middle of the road, and would not vote one way or the other based on this issue. I am guessing the numbers of pro- and anti- are close because if one side were strongly dominant than there wouldn't really be a battle.