SharpsDressedMan
member
I guess logic has no place here. "Why would you ever want to have or use a suppressor?" Answer: "Ever fired a gun?" The logic for using a suppressor is very simple. How convoluted a lawyer or prosecutor might make of this simple logic boggles the mind. The entire issue should be about any validation or invalidation of the justificaton for the self defense. What the hell does having a quieter gun have to do with any of that?