i nver found gell a good substitute for determining ballistics performance....
None of it means anything anyhow.... The diameter it achieves in gel is not necessarily the diameter it will be when shot into a human.
This is what I was referring to. I'm not sure how they found it, but they had volume, diameter, and depth listed.
More info challenging popular misconceptions of gelatin testing can be found at: http://www.firearmstactical.com/tact...3/0604-03a.htm