I'm going to purchase 1 gun out of my bonus. I have a number of good carry weapons, some sporting shotguns and rifles. I've boiled my choices down to:
1. Springfield EMP 1911 in 9mm; why? Fit's my hand, I love 1911's, 9mm is my primary carry caliber, it's 10 rounds and SA vs my current EDC which is a Kahr MK9
2. A Stag Arms AR15; why? I don't have any semi-auto rifles of any kind. I have some good bolt actions in many common calibers but no carbine, etc.
I wish I could get both but only one can come home. I might be leaning towards the EMP because it's just about the most beautiful thing I've ever seen and I can use it/carry it far more than a rifle which means I get to enjoy it more. On the other hand, It seems like a guy needs to have at least one carbine type weapon. I'm retired military so I like the AR format and I have a regular .223 rifle. Some would suggest we get an AR before the administration changes in washington? I don't know. I wouldn't use the AR for HD due to my home layout; I use a handgun. So this gun would be range work and just to have it if everything went crazy. I love the looks of an AR but wouldn't be too much fun only taking it out a handful of times a year to shoot. When I say it that way, the odds of me using/needing the AR are slim to none over the EMP. So I keep going on, back and forth :banghead:
So Just curious for some other thoughts I may not have thought about. I know "what would you do" isn't a great question becasue you're not me but based on this little bit, which of the two would you recommend I pick
Thanks Guys!
God Bless
Gideon
1. Springfield EMP 1911 in 9mm; why? Fit's my hand, I love 1911's, 9mm is my primary carry caliber, it's 10 rounds and SA vs my current EDC which is a Kahr MK9
2. A Stag Arms AR15; why? I don't have any semi-auto rifles of any kind. I have some good bolt actions in many common calibers but no carbine, etc.
I wish I could get both but only one can come home. I might be leaning towards the EMP because it's just about the most beautiful thing I've ever seen and I can use it/carry it far more than a rifle which means I get to enjoy it more. On the other hand, It seems like a guy needs to have at least one carbine type weapon. I'm retired military so I like the AR format and I have a regular .223 rifle. Some would suggest we get an AR before the administration changes in washington? I don't know. I wouldn't use the AR for HD due to my home layout; I use a handgun. So this gun would be range work and just to have it if everything went crazy. I love the looks of an AR but wouldn't be too much fun only taking it out a handful of times a year to shoot. When I say it that way, the odds of me using/needing the AR are slim to none over the EMP. So I keep going on, back and forth :banghead:
So Just curious for some other thoughts I may not have thought about. I know "what would you do" isn't a great question becasue you're not me but based on this little bit, which of the two would you recommend I pick
Thanks Guys!
God Bless
Gideon