I suppose I can contribute my 2 cents here. I have had several 75s, and liked them fine. They were accurate, reliable pistols. I have had quite a few Tanfoglio clones that were in general problematic and varied in quality. However, the IMI products are not in that category. I suspect Tanfoglio's contribution is simply "in-the-white" components that IMI finishes. I had several of the Baby Eagle configured pistols with slide mounted safety. Each was tighter in fit than my 75s, had better triggers, and fit my hand better than the 75 (which was comfortable enough). Not liking the slide mounted safety, I set about on a quest for a frame safety gun in the Jericho 941 configuration. After months of searching I found a new one, and snapped it up.
This pistol is a tack driver, 100% reliable, had a great trigger, and the full-length dust cover soaks up what little recoil the 9mm has. I had my smith go over the trigger further and now it breaks like glass in SA, with a short DA stroke that is quite smooth. I had plenty of Tanfoglio full cap mags from previous guns I sold, but added a CZ-75 slide stop so I could use CZ mags as well and have the slide lock back on both types. I prefer this pistol to the 75, although both are fine weapons. I also like the polygonal rifling of the Jericho as it is a bit easier to clean. Now 9mm is far from my preferred caliber, so the Jericho is a range toy for me and also suits my wife's small hands. Still it is a lot of fun to shoot. Neat looking too, if that counts for anything.
Were I to pick from your three choices, any are good. If I had only one 9mm I would probably go with the Jericho. The Glock 17 would be second--maybe first if I could have it worked over a little. I like Glocks with the right sights, a trigger job (they can be made to fell darn close to a 1911), and perhaps some other tweaks. The 75 would only come in last due to slight differences between them. Really it is an excellent pistol. Any way you cannot go wrong.
GR
GR