Kahr CW9 Range Report

Status
Not open for further replies.

tbone3

Member
Joined
Jan 19, 2008
Messages
31
Location
MO
Well after a lot of debating with myself I finally picked up a Kahr CW9. I have read many glowing reviews of the Kahr line of pistols. I have also read of many horror stories of malfunction prone guns and customer service that is somewhat lacking.

I took my new CW9 out to the range last Friday, along with my Kel Tec PF9 and S&W Sigma 9VE. Kahr recommends a 200 round break in period. After breaking down the gun into its major components, I cleaned the CW and lubed it with Weapon Shield Oil. I put 200 rounds of WWB through it in less than one hour! For me, that is a lot of shooting in a short period of time. The temps were in the 90’s and the little Kahr did heat up real quick. I took a couple of breaks during the 200 rounds to try to let it cool off but it didn’t really seem to. The slide and slide release lever did get really hot. I didn’t have a single malfunction during the 200 round break in period. I was really surprised how easy the gun was to shoot. I don’t really think I could have handled 200 rounds through the PF9 because it is so light weight. Usually after about 20 rounds with the PF9 I am done. I don’t think the Sigma would have been as easy either given the heavy trigger. I enjoy the Sigma but I think the trigger pull would get tiring after awhile. For me, the CW9 is a great compromise between the two other guns. It is heavy enough to handle recoil well and the trigger is light and smooth enough to not be tiring.

I then decided to run some different defensive rounds through the CW9 to see what kind of groups I would get as well as further reliability testing with JHP ammunition. I was shooting at 7 yards with no rest. 5 shots per target. This is right after the 200 round break in period without cleaning.

I shot the following JHP defensive ammunition:
Winchester Ranger 124gr +p
Winchester Ranger Bonded124gr +p
Winchester Ranger 127gr +p+
Speer Gold Dot 124gr +p
Federal HST 124gr +p
Federal 9BPLE 115gr +p+

Here are my targets:
 

Attachments

  • CW9 Ranger 124.JPG
    CW9 Ranger 124.JPG
    104.6 KB · Views: 25
  • CW9 Ranger 124 B.JPG
    CW9 Ranger 124 B.JPG
    96.7 KB · Views: 27
  • CW9 Ranger 127.JPG
    CW9 Ranger 127.JPG
    110.7 KB · Views: 19
  • CW9 Gold 124.JPG
    CW9 Gold 124.JPG
    110.2 KB · Views: 18
Last edited:
More Pics

Here are more targets and a five shot group from the PF9 and the CW9. I carry the Gold Dots in the PF9.
 

Attachments

  • CW9 HST124.JPG
    CW9 HST124.JPG
    112.3 KB · Views: 12
  • CW9 9BPLE.JPG
    CW9 9BPLE.JPG
    112.4 KB · Views: 12
  • CW9 WWB.JPG
    CW9 WWB.JPG
    78.4 KB · Views: 14
  • CW9 & PF9.JPG
    CW9 & PF9.JPG
    103 KB · Views: 25
Here is a size comparison of the CW9 to the PF9.
 

Attachments

  • CW9PF9-1.JPG
    CW9PF9-1.JPG
    158.2 KB · Views: 55
  • CW9PF9-3.JPG
    CW9PF9-3.JPG
    91.9 KB · Views: 21
  • CW9PF9-5.JPG
    CW9PF9-5.JPG
    139.3 KB · Views: 45
  • CW9PF9-7.JPG
    CW9PF9-7.JPG
    155.5 KB · Views: 30
It looks like yours likes to eat the bonded Rangers. I am running mine with 115 gr. Gold Dots right now but I will have to look into trying some of those Rangers.
 
I have one that belongs to a friend I shot it and really want to keep it Now just got to find the funds 350 bet he hasn't fired 50 rounds he in his early 70's and didn't like it
Been in his safe for a year or so.
 
tbone,

Thanks for taking the time and effort to post the high quality pics.

I'm sure those will help a lot of people 'see' the real life difference in size between the CW9 and PF9.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top