Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Kel-Tec SU-16 or Ruger Mini-14?

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by LightningJoe, Feb 23, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. LightningJoe

    LightningJoe Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Messages:
    796
    Location:
    The good part of Dallas (i.e. not Dallas)
    Which is better? And why?
     
  2. JShirley

    JShirley Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2002
    Messages:
    20,936
    Location:
    Atlanta
    KT: take readily available mags
    company has good record re RTKBA
    less expensive
    compact
    easily accessorized
    over-long LOP

    Ruger: rugged
    dependable
     
  3. bhk

    bhk Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2006
    Messages:
    1,042
    Location:
    Wooded acreage in rural midwest
    I have a new Stainless 580 series Mini (and previously owned an older one). The newer minis are more accurate than the much cussed older ones. The minis are rugged and neither of mine have ever jammed with any mags or any ammo. Makes a good truck/farm/security gun for me.

    My buddy has an SU-16. Granted, it is the only Keltec SU-16 I have shot, but it really didn't do much for me. It jams a lot, even with different ammo and mag types (I think others have had more luck with reliability, and Keltec does have good customer service). I believe it is more accurate than the Ruger, but I can shoot the Ruger better due to the stability its increased weight provides. My buddies SU is the C model which has a stock that makes it almost impossible (for me) to shoot off the bench using my normal bench techniques. If you were going to carry the rifles extensively in the field, though, the Keltec sure is nice. My buddies straps his on his back (with stock folded) while he checks his trap line in case an incidental coyote appears.

    Neither are good bench/target rifles due to Ruger's lack-luster basic accuracy and the Keltecs extreme lightness. Both are fun to shoot. Both make a good addition to a basic small-bore collection, as long as you have another accurate rifle for real target/long range varmint work.

    I really would suggest finding a way to try each out before buying either.
     
  4. The Deer Hunter

    The Deer Hunter Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2006
    Messages:
    2,801
    Location:
    Chairborne HQ, MA :(
    well, for one the Mini 14 isnt ugly as hell;)
     
  5. only1asterisk

    only1asterisk member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2003
    Messages:
    2,412
    They are both banned by name in the current house bill. I've never used either, but I'm all for anybody buying guns that the grabbers don't want us to have. Good luck with your choice.

    David
     
  6. silverlance

    silverlance Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Messages:
    2,142
    Location:
    In my Foxhole
    The Kel-Tec's extraction problems in the C, CA (california legal), and D (SBR) can be fixed easily and effectively by replacing the extractor with a DPMS AR-015 extractor. Once I did so my SU16 CA became as accurate at medium ranges as any AR.

    The Mini14 is nice but make sure you get the ghost ring 2006 or 2007 version. Also, make sure that you get 20 round ruger LE magazines if you can.

    Which brings me to another question - were any high capcity magazines made for the Mini14 in the aftermarket prior to 1999, and where can I find some?

    kev
     
  7. Essex County

    Essex County Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2005
    Messages:
    1,247
    Here's a vote for the latest Mini, although I feel they are overpriced. Essex
     
  8. MISFIRE

    MISFIRE Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2004
    Messages:
    34
    Location:
    San Jose Ca.
    Mini or SU 16

    I sold my SU 16 and am buying a Mini, Keltec is too much like a toy.
    Bill
     
  9. Drakejake

    Drakejake Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2002
    Messages:
    826
    Location:
    Nashville, TN
    I keep reconsidering the SU-16C but each time I conclude that I am happier with my Mini 14 in Butler Creek folder. I like more steel and less plastic in a rifle. I have not fired the Kel-Tec but have seen several at gun shows. I have a number of Kel-Tec handguns. I believe that the Mini is going to be more durable and reliable over the long term. I solved any accuracy problems some time ago with a home-made barrel strut.

    Side question: I am getting a .223 suppressor. Can the Mini 14 or SU-16 take one? (I plan to use the can on my DPMS AR-15.)

    Drakejake
     
  10. 10-Ring

    10-Ring Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    12,037
    Location:
    California
    I was not a fan of the older minis & have not had a chance to try one of the newer versions. I've shot a couple Kel Tecs and in my limited experience, they've been nice shooters.
     
  11. JShirley

    JShirley Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2002
    Messages:
    20,936
    Location:
    Atlanta
    There are some suppressors that are made to fit over a standard M16 flash hider. Not sure if those are on the 14 or will fit on the SU-16, but at least one model of the KT has a removable muzzle cap. You could get a suppressor with the right threads to fit it, though I don't know if the threads are long enough for support...?
     
  12. bestseller92

    bestseller92 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2005
    Messages:
    1,038
    Location:
    Oklahoma
    I have a 2005 Mini 14 and can highly recommend it.
     
  13. CZ223

    CZ223 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2006
    Messages:
    1,672
    Given your 2 choices

    I think I might go with the Saiga. No, I don't even own one yet. The Rugers are overpriced in my opinion but, I have not shot one of the newer ones. I only say they are overpiced because they have never been very accurate. I have always liked their looks especially with the factory folder in stainless. The Kel-Tec is a neat idea and I like the way you can carry mags in the butt-stock but, it is not legal for me to carry them that way in my state so it offers me no advantage. If you don't want an AR for whatever reason I would seriously consider the Saiga. It is the least expensive, fairly accurate if not better, by all accounts and, it is a proven design.
     
  14. sorensen440

    sorensen440 member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2007
    Messages:
    107
    Location:
    Livermore, CA
    I like my keltec su16 bravo
    put a few thousand rounds thru it and havnt had any jams since I threw my cheapo mags in the trash
     
  15. g5reality

    g5reality member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2007
    Messages:
    379
    I vote for the mini-14. It's a great rifle. Can be dressed up in a number of different ways with just about everything you can have on any AR.

    The New mini's 14's & 30's serial #'s 580 & 581 respectively, are much more accurate than the older ones and have much heavier barrels.

    Also now that they've made the AWB maybe they'll get a little more respect.
     
  16. Srigs

    Srigs Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2006
    Messages:
    836
    Location:
    Minnesota
    A Kel-tec Bravo is my next rifle. It fold into a small space and takes AR mags. :)
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page