Kerry 'Unfit to be Commander-in-Chief'?

Is Kerry Unfit to be Commander in Chief?

  • No - because of anti-military position

    Votes: 20 45.5%
  • No - but for other reasons

    Votes: 29 65.9%
  • Yes - His past actions and words don't count

    Votes: 1 2.3%
  • Yes - He is the best person for the job now running.

    Votes: 2 4.5%

  • Total voters
    44
Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Dec 26, 2002
Messages
409
Location
Slower, Lower Delaware
Moderator - if this has been posted previously, please delete or lock as you see fit. Thanks!

================

Comments on this story please! I wonder if this will;
A. get any play in partisan media?
B. make any difference?
================


Kerry 'Unfit to be Commander-in-Chief', Say Former Military Colleagues

By Marc Morano, CNSNews.com Senior Staff Writer May 03, 2004 (CNSNews.com)

Hundreds of former commanders and military colleagues of presumptive Democratic nominee John Kerry are set to declare in a signed letter that he is "unfit to be commander-in-chief." They will do so at a press conference in Washington on Tuesday.

"What is going to happen on Tuesday is an event that is really historical in dimension," John O'Neill, a Vietnam veteran who served in the Navy as a PCF (Patrol Craft Fast) boat commander, told CNSNews.com .

The event, which is expected to draw about 25 of the letter-signers, is being organized by a newly formed group called Swift Boat Veterans for Truth.

"We have 19 of 23 officers who served with [Kerry]. We have every commanding officer he ever had in Vietnam. They all signed a letter that says he is unfit to be commander-in-chief," O'Neill said.

O'Neill, currently a Houston, Texas, based attorney, is no stranger to Kerry. O'Neill served in the same naval unit as Kerry and commanded Kerry's swift boat after Kerry returned to the United States. Kerry's command of the PCF boat lasted four months and ended shortly after he received his third Purple Heart. According to naval regulations at the time, any sailor who received three Purple Hearts could request a transfer out of the combat zone.

Kerry and O'Neill engaged in a nationally televised debate in 1971 on The Dick Cavett Show over Kerry's allegations that many Vietnam soldiers had routinely engaged in atrocities such as raping and cutting off ears and heads of Vietnamese soldiers and citizens. Kerry was the then spokesman for the anti-war group Vietnam Veterans Against the War.

"We are going to be presenting a letter that deals with Kerry's unfitness to be commander-in-chief that has been signed by hundreds of swift boat sailors, including most of those who served with Kerry," O'Neill explained.

"The ranks of the people signing [the letter] range from admiral down to seaman, and they run across the entire spectrum of politics, specialties, and political feelings about the Vietnam War," he added.

Among those scheduled to attend the event at the National Press Club and declare Kerry unfit for the role of commander-in-chief are retired Naval Rear Admiral Roy Hoffman, who was the commander of the Navy Coastal Surveillance Force, which included the swift boats on which Kerry served.

Also scheduled to be present at the event is Kerry's former commanding officer, Lt. Commander Grant Hibbard. Hibbard recently questioned whether Kerry deserved the first of his three Purple Hearts that he received in Vietnam. Hibbard doubted both the severity of the wound and whether it resulted from enemy fire. "I've had thorns from a rose that were worse" than Kerry's wound for which he received a Purple Heart, Hibbard told the Boston Globe in April.

Organizers are confident that Tuesday's event and the letter with hundreds of signatures will educate people about Kerry.

"It is one of the largest outpourings of concern about him being commander-in-chief that anybody could have in a presidential campaign and it is by the people who know him best," O'Neill said.

'Unfit Commander-in-Chief'

Swift Boat Veterans For Truth maintains that Kerry's fellow Vietnam veterans are almost uniform in their disdain for his military service and anti-war protests.

"Not only a majority of the people who served with him feel that way, but a vast and overwhelming majority," O'Neill said. He added that more than "ninety percent of the people contacted by Swift Boat Veterans for Truth responded to the request to sign their name, with only 12 declining to sign.

"Comrades who actually served with him, almost all of them, are opposed to him, and believe he would be an unfit commander-in-chief and intend to bring the truth of his actual record to the attention of the American people," O'Neill said.

O'Neill hopes the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth can reveal to the American people what he sees as Kerry's flawed character.

"In the military, loyalty between commanders and the troops serving them is a two-way street. We have here a guy (Kerry) that with all of us in the field [in Vietnam] -- actually fighting the North Vietnamese -- came home and then falsely accused all of us of war crimes at a time when the people in uniform couldn't even respond," O'Neill said.

"And he did that knowing that was a lie," he added.

'Real John Kerry'

B. G. Burkett, author of the book Stolen Valor and a military researcher, believes that Tuesday's event will not be dismissed easily by Kerry's campaign as a "partisan" attack.

"There are probably just as many Democrats amongst sailors who sailed swift boats as there are Republicans. What Kerry fails to realize is this has nothing to do with politics -- this has to with Vietnam Veterans who served, who have a beef with John Kerry's service, both during and after the war," Burkett told CNSNews.com.

"The American people do not know John Kerry and hopefully the swift boat crews and other Vietnam veterans will make sure that the American public knows the real John Kerry," he added.

Jim Loftus of Kerry's press office referred questions about Swift Boat Veterans for Truth's event on Tuesday to spokesman David Wade. Wade did not return CNSNews.com's requests for comment.
=========================================
 
your poll looks screwed up.

you ask is kerry unfit to be commander in chief but look at the selections.

you got yes and no backwards.

unless you are asking is kerry fit to be commander in chief.

unless my head is not screwed on straight.
 
Kerry is unfit to be Commander-In-Chief for many reasons, but the root problem is his low character. It's a constant theme that runs through his public life. It explains his dishonest grasping for medals in Vietnam with an eye on a future political career, it explains the lies he told about his fellow Vietnam Vets when he returned to the US, it explains his voting record in the US Congress where the only principle he followed was to pander to as many special-interest voting blocs as possible in order to further his career, it explains his anti-military voting record, it explains the 100% rating he gets from the Brady Campaign, it explains his gigolo's pursuit of wealthy widows, it explains his vulgar vanity, it explains his dismissive contempt for the Secret Service Agents pledged to give their lives to save his, it explains everything about a man who is as low minded, venial, dishonest, contemptous, and sociopathic as is John Kerry.

Does his character matter? No, it absolutely does not matter to the majority of American Voters. They will vote for him just as readily as they did for a candidate with a similar lack of character: Bill Clinton, and as readily as they will in four years for another candidate cut from the same soiled cloth: Hillary Clinton.
 
Around here, I suspect that his 100% approval rating by the VPC is going to be a factor :barf:.

But I also agree that his character (or lack thereof) is the core issue.

:scrutiny:
 
I see the confusion. The article is titled is he UNfit and I thought I titled the poll is he Fit... but I can't see the title of the poll. Sorry folks. I guess I messed up my first poll.

I meant for the poll to say; is he FIT to be CIC.

Again, sorry for the screw-up. :(
 
I voted No- "for other reasons"

But I wanted to vote NO for both his lack of support for the military as well as the endless litany of "other reasons" that Cool Hand Luke 22:36 summed up so very well.

The guy just ain't got no morals.

(Flipflop that is, not Cool Hand!)

Esky
 
I'd say his 100% anti-Right to Keep and Bear Arms voting record might have SOMETHING to do with why I think he shouldn't be elected. Of course, some forum members actively support Kerry, and thus presumably oppose the right to keep and bear arms and are trolls who somehow missed the "promote responsible firearm ownership" bit in the Rules of Conduct.

http://www.bradycampaign.org/facts/scorecard/scorecard.php?inds=42

Being anti-Bush is easy to reconcile with being pro-RKBA. Being pro-Kerry is, almost by definition, anti-RKBA, and opposed to what this forum is meant to stand for. That's not a matter of opinion, that's a matter of reading his voting record. It makes as much sense as Jewish Chefs for Pork and Shellfish Boiled in Milk.
 
This would be a good example of how a poll can influence the results. In this case the bias is unintended, but much of the polling in this country is conducted with bias and the results are better appreciated by the client should the results support their views... so skew the questions..

Do you approve of "X" even knowing that he kills babys?
 
I've got a different reason why I could never vote for him.

Anyone who brings a Harley Davidson to a stop by dragging both feet on the ground has serious issues......

:D :D :D

Ron
 
Let me get this straight.

1. Many Democrats are saying that alledged war crimes committed by troops in Iraq are grounds for removing the President of the United States from office.

2. The apparent Democrat Candidate for President of the United States is a confessed war criminal who has never been prosecuted.

HuH?:confused:

Geoff
Who is certain this makes perfect sense to Democrats. :banghead:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top