Landmark 2nd Amendment victory at SCOTUS in NYSRPA Inc. v. Bruen!!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
The law must be struck down clearly , entirely and quickly. There can be none of the usual ambiguity that justices do when they get lost in the weeds . Obviously Governor Hochtul and party quickly saw the giant fumble of Clarence’s sensitive blather and historical precedents principle. Can’t ban Manhattan , how clever Clarence! Just ban every locale in the state.

How many years to undo this? Thanks
 
GEM said:
The law must be struck down clearly , entirely and quickly. There can be none of the usual ambiguity that justices do when they get lost in the weeds . Obviously Governor Hochtul and party quickly saw the giant fumble of Clarence’s sensitive blather and historical precedents principle. Can’t ban Manhattan , how clever Clarence! Just ban every locale in the state.

How many years to undo this? Thanks
Click to expand...
It SHOULD get slapped down or at least an injunction placed on it at the very first hearing...that assumes of coarse that it goes before a judge with common sense.

Either way...it doesn't come close to "shall issues", and NY government knows this. It will get shut down, and they will come back with a slightly less stupid version.. and it too will get slammed...and on and on it will go.

This is the flaw in our Constitution. The SCOTUS doesn't have the ability to enforce its rulings.
 
A similar situation developed in IL when they were forced to establish some actual way that people could carry concealed. IL was so lazy about it, in classic IL fashion, that they almost got to the point of allowing constitutional carry because they're idiots. The governor (Quinn - former governor) even vetoed the bill and was overruled because it was a stupid thing to do (as a liberal) to have it vetoed and insure MORE carry rights. They made it expensive, and time consuming, and they have various ridiculous places you have to disarm, but they passed something that actually let people carry. IL just full banned carry previously, which was outrageous. NY basically did too just by saying they'd consider your app but just denied them. The "may issue" concept is such a scam. I'm glad that these state schemes are finally being overruled as the travesties that they are. It's a shame to have people spending so much time and money for a right, but that's today's America.
 
Six years and probably I'm toast, sad to say. So personally and selfishly, NYSRPA v Bruen is a fail for me. Not a prosocial perspective for the good of humanity in the long term but that's the way it is.

The Church goer and or the synagogue participant can't carry a gun but the criminally intentioned religious/racial bigot can stroll in at will. The shopper can't carry a gun but the racist or ethnically motivated maniac can just stroll in as in TOPS or El Paso.
 
GEM said:
Six years and probably I'm toast, sad to say. So personally and selfishly, NYSRPA v Bruen is a fail for me. Not a prosocial perspective for the good of humanity in the long term but that's the way it is.

The Church goer and or the synagogue participant can't carry a gun but the criminally intentioned religious/racial bigot can stroll in at will. The shopper can't carry a gun but the racist or ethnically motivated maniac can just stroll in as in TOPS or El Paso.
Click to expand...

@GEM you're not wrong. Short term, I wish the two guys involved in NYSRPA v. Bruen had just taken their hunting/target shooting permits, said, "thanks" and went on their way. Now we're stuck with a more restrictive law than we started with.
 
Personally I would far rather lose it all than live in servile compliance to gross violations of my right!
 
jrmiddleton425 said:
@GEM you're not wrong. Short term, I wish the two guys involved in NYSRPA v. Bruen had just taken their hunting/target shooting permits, said, "thanks" and went on their way. Now we're stuck with a more restrictive law than we started with.
Click to expand...
It's going to get tossed out pretty quickly. It's blatantly bad. The lower courts have to take the new ruling into account. No way does this go in effect for long
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

A
  • Locked
If SCOTUS rules positively in NYSRPA Inc. v. Bruen how far away are we from Constitutional Carry?
2 3
Replies
54
Views
2K
Spats McGee
Spats McGee
F-111 John
  • Locked
Supreme Court Issues Final Ruling: NYSRPA v. Bruen
2 3 4 5
Replies
118
Views
6K
LiveLife
LiveLife
LiveLife
Antonyuk v. Nigrelli - Supreme Court Will Rule On States Defying Its NYSRPA v. Bruen Decision
2 3
Replies
56
Views
6K
jstert
jstert
A
  • Locked
What happens to a Constitutional Carry case at SCOTUS after today's ruling in NYSRPA Inc. v. Bruen?
Replies
6
Views
480
F-111 John
F-111 John
A
  • Locked
SCOTUS accepts first major 2nd Amendment Gun case in over a decade - NY State Rifle & PA v. Corlett
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Replies
187
Views
11K
Frank Ettin
Frank Ettin
Back
Top