I think only the 1911 model is adjustable, but do the rest of 'em really need to be? They're plenty close enough for their intended role.
Well you see where this is going.
Nowhere, far as I can see:
1. The LaserMax is not adjustable!
True, but it is located much closer to the bore's centerline, so it's going to be closer to on target over a much wider range than the Crimson Trace, most of which are mounted off axis (the Crimson Trace is going to be 'on target' at one distance only). With the LaserMax, for varying distances you're going to have to correct for elevation only - with the Crimson Trace, you're going to have to correct for both elevation AND windage.
'Course, for the distances you'll probably being using a laser, the accuracy arguments are probably specious.
2. You might have to use one hand to fend off an attacker!
If the attacker is that close, I'm probably going to be point shooting.
And so it goes...
There are good / bad for both units - as usual, most folks are going to point out only one side of the argument - that which supports their preference.
One thing that gave me pause with the Crimson Trace is the very selling feature most often quoted - I'm thinking the one handed operation could be susceptible to sympathetic finger reflex, and to top it off, you know what happens to fine motor skills when you're under stress.
(I've seen a few cases where LE fired their gun when they meant to activate their weapon mounted light, which I assume required the use of the second hand!)
I have a LaserMax on a P229R and XDSC9 - I weighed what I thought were the good / bad points of both units, and decided on the LaserMax.
(I do have a Crimson Trace on an LCP).
Whatever you choose, just don't make the mistake of allowing yourself to get locked into using one side of an argument to make your decision.