Lead Sled

Status
Not open for further replies.
I guess I'm not a skilled shooter then. I've only been suing one for ten years, along with proper rests and sand bags (that I make myself). I've also only been able to shoot sub-MOA with buckhorn sights off the sled. In the time I've used it, the sled has proven to me that it is more easily repeatable than any other rest I've used.

No, the stock 'may' absorb the recoil or it may simply transmit it. Rigidly bolted to a machine rest, it will absorb it. Held in place by a shooter and/or a lead sled, it simply transmits recoil to the shooter/sled.

We may have to just agree to disagree because I am not a neophyte. I don't shoot my rifles two or three times before hunting season and consider myself ready. I work from home, shoot on my own property and shoot my rifles year round.
 
LOL!

We can agree to disagree!

But you certainly have a sour attitude!
your entitled to that.

I wasn't trying to pick on you specifically, but thats what you thought.

Even the "IDEA" that the stock doesn't absorb 100% of the recoil EVERY SINGLE SHOT, "PERIOD" is beyond bizarre! Maybe you can remove all your stocks from their barrelled actions and hunt with them that way. After all the stock doesn't absorb anything from the recoil. You can believe anything you like.

But, please don't misinform people into thinking the lead sled is the be all and end all shooting "AID"! It helps lots of shooters every year, but I have seen huge numbers of problems/issues associated with them. Use what you like.


I would love to see you shoot sub MOA with Buck horn sights! You may get lucky and shoot one occasionally, but thats about it. You can fool some shooters, but you won't fool me!

And for my personal experience, thanks to "many other experienced/knowledgable shooters" over the last 30+ years of hunting, guiding, and competition, I have gained WAYYY too much experience to be fooled by someone of your "apparent" experience/knowledge! Maybe you dont/didnt explain yourself well, I am not sure.

I have been blessed to have the opportunity to built custom rifle barrels and rifles with a very skilled gunsmith friend of mine for years, who was trained by a gentleman you and others may have heard of! "P.O. Ackley."

I shoot more than some people do that is for sure! And I wish I could do more.

I shoot on my own property as well, thats no big deal, its a privilege to have and use it!

I shoot year around as well, in very different conditions than you likely/may experience. I have learned a FAIR amount of how to adjust for weather conditions! It can be brutal! It has broadened my experience base for sure.

I don't intend/desire to insult people in this forum.

I hope you do not feel too insulted to learn from me, like I learn from others. Learning
about this passion, is what keeps the enjoyment fresh.

In the end, use what works for you. Experience "WILL" tell shooters whats best.
 
Using the lead sled for load development is not the choice of skilled shooters, I can promise you that! That should tell you "EVERYTHING" right there.

That actually says nothing, without some kind of data to back that up....please elaborate.
 
Are Lead-Sleds used at benchrest matches?
Those guys are the kings in terms of accuracy and form repeatability.
 
Lead Sled DFT

Saw 2 guys at the range fiddle for 20 minutes adjusting a Lead Sled DFT model (their most sophisticated model) for elevation and windage before they got on paper. Each time they took a shot, the adjustments would start again.
They quit in frustration.

This was on a dead flat rock solid concrete bench top.

Looked like a barrel of fun.

I kept my mouth shut and made due with a couple leather Protektor bags.
 
Yep! I tried to help, but some people are not willing to take on a new more informed idea.
Its just pride really, and I understand that.


I make mistakes all the time as well, but I can admit it when I do.

I dont know everything for sure, but i "am" trying to help.
 
^^again, could you please provide SOME evidence that supports what you are saying? I am all about informed ideas but you have provided no information.

I don't think a lack of use by bench rest shooters speaks much. the lead sled was not made for competitive bench rest shooters. A typical bench rest rifle is a lead sled unto itself, and I am not developing loads for a $4000 60lb bench rest rifle. I am sure they are not up to par with hand machined rests for 1000 yd matches, but that's not what I bought it for.
I'm developing loads for a 9lb synthetic M70 in .300 winmag, and for the money, until somebody comes up with some real proof that a sled gives up anything to bags, I will have to stand by my experiences, and continue to use my sled for what I bought it for, testing handloads at ranges up to 400 yards.
So far I am completely happy with mine and have not heard otherwise from anybody who has any real time on one.

I found a chuck hawks article that reviews the DFT sled vs. the original sled, and does mention that there were some issues with the original sled flexing that were eliminated with the DFT version. I can't speak for that, but I have the DFT and have never noticed any "wandering point of aim". I have noticed groups that open up or tighten d up consistently depending on load variations. Again, we are talking consistent repeat results.

Nothing in the Chuck Hawk article was mentioned about why a "skilled" shooter would avoid a lead sled setup for load development. In fact, the opposite was stated.
 
Last edited:
Didn't realize this was a hornets' nest.
I did learn a few things though...
Mainly that I don't have 1/10 of the experience some of you have, but I think I'm heading in the right direction in zeroing then working with a zeroed rifle to improve myself... That M70 in 270 I have is prob a 3-400+ yard rifle, I was happy to hit the 250 target 4/5 times (resting)... The sled (bags?) show me I need to improve b/c the rifle is better than me...
Thanks,
Greg
 
Silicosys4:

Do you honestly think that rifle accuracy is all about "holding a rifle steady"!? Holy mackerel!

Have you ever Talked to the average or advanced precision/benchrest shooter, and ask them what they do for "load development for the best accuracy"? if they are the sociable type, they will TALK YOU EAR OFF! They do piles of things to control variables! Great bunch of guys!

If you suggested to them that they should try a lead sled to develop their competition ammunition, they would NEVER keep a straight face, or be speechless!

Sure you can load develop with a lead sled, but you will never reach the potential of the firearm/ load combo. too much uncontrolled movement. Every shot you take, you have to repeatably readjust the whole setup to shoot again. A major flaw in consistency/ repeatability.

When shooting off sandbags and rear rest, the rifle can smoothly recoil rearward and return to battery with minimal readjustments. They often powder the sand bags to reduce friction for consistency. With some of the newer materials that is no longer as much of an issue.

With lighter weight hunting rifles that are not built to super tight tolerances, and heavier weights, absolutely everything is MORE critical. The light rifles move both far more and much faster during every shot sequence. Enhancing the issues of shot impact dispersion. The lighter barrels tend to flex and occilate much more dramatically.

If the rifle isn't placed exactly in the saddle the same every time, it will show up on the target.

If the sled isn't square to the target line, the rifle will recoil at an angle that is impossible to eliminate, or repeat.

If the rifles forend and butt isn't fully supported for torsional & side to side stresses/movement, it will torque and move differently every time, again showing up on the target.

If the wing nuts are not tightened the same each time, the play/tolerance in the threads and the bolt holes will rattle inconsistently, showing up on the target.

If the feet on the lead sled do not have the exact same amount of weight, and traction coefficient, the sled will track differently each shot, showing up on the target.

If you don't have the exact amount of weight distributed on the lead sled the same every shot (and they shift every time), will effect the direction and consistency of the recoil, Showing up on the target.

Seeing any trends yet?

The total shot dispersion of all those uncontrollable variables can really add up!

All these and many more are present with every lead sled. If you are not aware of them, it can lead to frustration and unsatisfactory results. Or ignorance is bliss. Which one applies?

If your lucky, then your lucky. You "may" get good enough accuracy for some rifles. But I don't want my hard work, and invested time/money to be left to chance!

If you feel its working for you, then fine. But knowing its limitations will improve your knowledge and flexibility to adjust for it.

If lead sleds were the best option, then I guarantee you that they would be used in unlimited class long-range and bench rest matches. The big machined and perfected rests there are certainly no Lead Sleds!

If chuck Hawk said for experienced shooters should use the lead sled for load development, he wasn't referring to bench rest and long range precision shooters I can promise you!

If he was, he obviously was getting a kick back for sales! LOL!

If you have to rely on using the Lead sled to develop your loads (which isn't a bad thing, as I have stated all along), doesn't that tell you where the skill levels of those who don't need them to develop loads are? Every one of them started somewhere.

And by the way, check post #21. There you will see I listed a reference of a fellow that will explain a little about vibration inconsistencies in some of his videos. There are a few of his vids that have them. He has decent graphics and displays for clarity. That will save me piles of typing! LOL!

He gives some Great information for the learning shooter!

On my first post, I said that a lead sled is like a crutch. I may have been a little off on that assessment. It is more like "training wheels". once you learn to shoot to your best ability with it, throw the wheels off and go "all Natural"! You will learn more, and develop more skill than you can imagine! Its fun and rewarding as heck!

For all you guys who do have/need to use the lead sled, thats just fine! As long as it gets you shooting, then its the "best" available alternative!

By better understanding of the limitations of our equipment, it better helps a shooter to more accurately track and plot their progress throughout the load development process. Then if the results aren't what you desire, you won't loose confidence because of variables you "CANT" control. And confidence in shooting helps a shooter to relax and perform at their peak ability.


I hope the readers out there can see my points. My intentions are to inform, not judge.

Maybe some readers can learn a thing or two. That would make all this typing more worthwhile LOL!
 
^^For a person who wishes to inform and not judge, you have provided little to no real information, but offered up plenty of judgement concerning the sled and those who use them.
You infer that only benchrest shooters are truly knowledgable, and only that top tier level of equipment they use is suitable.
I am not interested in hearing about competitive benchrest shooters concerning the sled. It's apples to oranges.
Soon as I get that anal about my competitive bench rest shooting I'm sure I will need to step up and spend a grand on a rest and bags, and long days at the bench off bags will be easier with a 50 or 60lb rifle.
Till then I will enjoy the benefits of my sled, being able to shoot 50 rounds of heavy recoiling loads in a sitting testing various powder and bullet combos without bruising my shoulder or developing a flinch. If you feel the pounding off bags is worth some supposed gain, good for you. I have both and use them both.

You seem to have an idea stuck in your head about the inconsistencies with the sled. Yes, if I were shooting at 1000 yards I'm sure I would switch to bags, for the reasons you described. But I am not, and the sleds are not the pillars of jello you make them out to be.
Have you actually used one? The DFT is very solid, in my experience. Loaded down with 40lbs of lead, it moves very little under recoil with the .300 winmag, and once set, requires no more "fiddling" or adjusting between shots than bags do. It is plenty consistent to be able to tell a 3/4 MOA load from a 1 MOA load at 100 yards. I know this for a fact.

the sled doesn't just "get me shooting".....it is a tool that provides a specialized use, at which it does a great job for me at the level its intended to work at. Yes it has limitations, but so do bags, and each have their uses to me.

How is the sled "training wheels" as I'm using it? Would a flinch be more or less of a crutch?

What happens when I earn my big boy shooting wings, and can ditch my "training wheels"? Recoil suddenly doesn't exist?

Can you link a forum thread or article with someone shooting back to back off bags and a sled, where there was a significant change in point of impact between the two? That would be contrary to my experiences and would be interesting.

Very curious
 
Last edited:
With bags there are variables and with the sled there are variables, there are variables shooting out of the deer hut rested on the edge of the window, there are variables shooting GH's from the truck with the rifle rested on the mirror. As long as I know that the rifle is able to do it's job without question then in real world hunting situations it's my job to deal with the variables. For me the sled, when sighting in, takes me out of the equation for the most part and allows me to make sure the rifle is on target. I have sighted in with bags as well and it works as well.I guess I better get a gun vise:banghead:
 
You have basically repeated exactly what I have said from the begining.

"If it works for you fine". But its not the best tool for the job. Your shoulder is.

I have spent enough time behind a rifle to know exactly what it takes to shoot well as well.

I have provided you with a pile of information as to why and how. You have conceeded to some of my points that I was trying to get accross.
And you still want some kind of "proof"!? Wow!

I dont understand why people shoot rifles that recoil more than they can handle.
It promotes bad form and flinching for sure. If a rifle is too big to shoot from the shoulder sufficiently enough to develop a load, then the rifle isnt all that suitable for the shooter. Again, the crutch principle. But thats up to the shooter I guess.

We live in a time where only magnums can kill game I guess.

Again, shoot what you like. In the end if your happy with the results then fine.
 
I wanted to post one more thing in here before this gets locked....looks like where it is going.

I have some medical issues, 5 bits of metal holding my head on basically....using a lead sled is the only way that I can shoot some of my rifles, 1903 springfield for example. It just flat gives me a headache. So my choices are, sell a lifetime of rifles that I have collected, just let them sit and be wall hangers or safe queens...or use something like this and enjoy them.

If some people think that is a crutch ok I am fine with that, if you think that a rifle stock can't take the recoil of the cartridge well think what you want I have shot some pretty expensive rifles, with pretty thin wrists and never broke a single thing. I think you are dead wrong in that area.

Bottom line I like it, it is a safe tool, easy to use and setup and with it correctly setup I have put 1 ragged hole in paper indoors shooting....so I know it works.

You don't like it fine, but I will never believe until I see it first hand that it broke a stock...I think that is pure BS and if a stock was broken I would bet there was an issue with the gun in the first place.
 
Saw 2 guys at the range fiddle for 20 minutes adjusting a Lead Sled DFT model (their most sophisticated model) for elevation and windage before they got on paper. Each time they took a shot, the adjustments would start again.
They quit in frustration.

This was on a dead flat rock solid concrete bench top.

Looked like a barrel of fun.

I kept my mouth shut and made due with a couple leather Protektor bags.
Sound like there guns was NOT sight in to start with.
 
Arthur has taken over so I use one and I have other gun rest that I use. Also I have them for my hand gun's. So it is what it is.
 
But you certainly have a sour attitude!
If my attitude is sour, it's probably because you implied that I was not a serious shooter and that my findings are just wrong. Which is very odd and juvenile. Last I checked, if you build a $60,000 addition to your house just so you can have more room for your guns, your leatherwork and your handloading, you're probably pretty serious. :rolleyes:


Even the "IDEA" that the stock doesn't absorb 100% of the recoil EVERY SINGLE SHOT, "PERIOD" is beyond bizarre!
Apparently you fell to sleep during physics class. That push you feel when you fire a shot, that's recoil. If the stock absorbed 100% of recoil, you wouldn't feel a thing. Like I said, unless the rifle is bolted down rigidly, the stock transmits recoil to the shooter or in this case, the sled. If you can't understand this basic principle, perhaps the rest is lost on you.


But, please don't misinform people into thinking the lead sled is the be all and end all shooting "AID"!
I never said it was. I said it works and apparently it works much better than those who have never used one would lead folks to believe. MY EXPERIENCE tells me that it works, it works well and it is easier to attain consistency than with bags or a traditional rest. FOR MY PURPOSES. (see below)


I would love to see you shoot sub MOA with Buck horn sights! You may get lucky and shoot one occasionally, but thats about it. You can fool some shooters, but you won't fool me!
This discussion will go a lot better if you stop assuming you're talking to an inexperienced idiot. It will be FAR more amiable if you don't call me a liar. Yes, I so shoot sub-MOA groups with buckhorns and it was not a fluke. And I hate buckhorn sights. I'm sorry if your ability prevents you from doing this or believing others can do things you cannot.


And for my personal experience, thanks to "many other experienced/knowledgable shooters" over the last 30+ years of hunting, guiding, and competition, I have gained WAYYY too much experience to be fooled by someone of your "apparent" experience/knowledge! Maybe you dont/didnt explain yourself well, I am not sure.
Perhaps you have yet to learn or experience everything. Maybe you need to spend more time with iron sights??? I don't know but you could certainly use a lesson in tact. I don't lie and I don't take flukes as fact.


I don't intend/desire to insult people in this forum.
And you don't think questioning another's character is insulting??? I have to admit, it's been a long time since I was called a liar. Even online.


I really could not care less what benchresters do or what they use. It is as irrelevant as what toilet paper they use in the outhouse. I'm not shooting at 1000yds with 60lb rifles and looking for every thousandth of an inch. To me, that is more boring than watching the grass grow. I cannot even begin to describe to you how much that aspect of the shooting sports does not interest me. Here's another newsflash, benchresters aren't the only "serious" shooters. I have never claimed that lead sleds were the best rest to use for shooting or that they would be better for benchrest. This is because I know little about benchrest shooting and don't care to know. All I have claimed, from my own experience (not theory), is that they work. They reduce felt recoil to almost nothing. They ARE repeatable and consistent for load development and that I have found them to not be at a disadvantage compared to a traditional rest and/or sandbags. That I have never broken a stock. So perhaps, rather than making accusations, condescending remarks and calling folks out as liars, a few questions to quantify what results have been gleaned from what shooting, with what rifles and at what ranges would've been more appropriate. You might get a more harmonious outcome AND learn something in the process.


I dont understand why people shoot rifles that recoil more than they can handle.
As I have already explained, bench shooting and offhand shooting are not the same. As I have already explained, I can shoot 12ga all day long with lightweight shotguns wearing hard buttplates but a few rounds of a .30/06 class cartridge from the bench finishes me off. As I have already explained, the sled allows me to do a lot more shooting for load development without fatigue. As I have already explained, the sled is not for practice. It is not for developing shooting skill. It is for developing loads, period. So all your condescending nonsense about it being a crutch or inducing a flinch is exactly that, nonsense.

And for the record, I initially bought the sled to use for a rifle I intended to take to Africa. Not everybody who owns a heavy rifle is shooting deer with it. :rolleyes:

Here's some hard truth, you don't know everything. I don't know everything either and freely claim my own ignorance, as I did above with regards to benchrest shooting. If you ever believe you're at the point you have nothing else to learn, you probably don't know half what you think you know. You need to throttle back on the ego and the condescension before this gets out of hand.

Next time you're in Tennessee, I'd be glad to show you what iron sights can do. You might learn something. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
CraigC:

If you are half the person you say you are, then we could enjoy good gun conversation.

If you think money denotes how serious you are, then thats your first mistake.

Your Quote: "You need to throttle back on the ego and the condescension before this gets out of hand."

I think, no, I KNOW your ego is an issue Craig! LOL!

Lets just agree to disagree and leave it at that!
 
Last edited:
If you are half the person you say you are, then we could enjoy good gun conversation.
I don't tend to have good gun conversations with people who call me a liar.

If you think money denotes how serious you are, then thats your first mistake.
By itself, no. But building onto your house, just to have enough room for your shooting related stuff and enough bench space for at least six presses, strikes me as pretty serious. You want to question my level of experience and commitment, this is the response you get.

Here's a good example, although I'm adding a lot more space and for more than just guns.

http://www.rugerforum.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=188491


I think, no, I KNOW your ego is an issue Craig!
I don't come here to brag or get my ego stroked but I do expect a certain level of common courtesy. I 'should' be able to share knowledge and experience without being called a liar or having my commitment questioned. The hostility in this thread is your doing, not mine. We can debate on a technical level all day long but you left no room for that with your condescension, character judgements and name calling.
 
DThunter, You have provided nothing to this thread but an uninformed opinion, veiled insults, and misinformation.

I think this thread has dissolved into two distinct groups.
Those who have lead sleds or have used them enough to understand them,
Those who don't or haven't.

Interesting to note how stratified the two groups are.
Funny how the people who have actually used them are almost universally in favor of them.

Please point me to the post, thread, article, or review that goes something like; "I have a sled, used it for XXXXX amount of time, and had XXXX inconsistent results compared to XXX method. The sled is subpar for what it does"

Until then you are posturing, blustering, and hypothesizing....and relying on veiled insults and shady language to carry your message against people who have actual experience, questioning their honesty rather than providing any actual experience or information yourself. Calling people on this thread a liar, unskilled, saying they are using a "crutch" or "training wheels"....without explaining why. Stating that Chuck Hawks takes kick backs to promote items. These are not high road activities, and you are talking out of your rear.

I request that you post a link, recount an actual experience you have had with a sled, or leave this thread as your input is essentially useless to this thread and, it seems, completely uninformed to boot.
 
Last edited:
DThunter, You have provided nothing to this thread but an uninformed opinion, veiled insults, and misinformation.

I think this thread has dissolved into two distinct groups.
Those who have lead sleds or have used them enough to understand them,
Those who don't or haven't.

Interesting to note how stratified the two groups are.
Funny how the people who have actually used them are almost universally in favor of them.

Please point me to the post, thread, article, or review that goes something like; "I have a sled, used it for XXXXX amount of time, and had XXXX inconsistent results compared to XXX method. The sled is subpar for what it does"

Until then you are posturing, blustering, and hypothesizing....and relying on veiled insults and shady language to carry your message against people who have actual experience, questioning their honesty rather than providing any actual experience or information yourself. Calling people on this thread a liar, while you are the one blatently talking out your rear. Stating that Chuck Hawks takes kick backs to promote items. These are not high road activities.

I request that you post a link, recount an actual experience you have had with a sled, or leave this thread as your input is essentially useless to this thread and, it seems, completely uninformed to boot.
In this day and age I would want more then just a thread....this is the internet and everyone is an expert.

All I know is that I have used one for years with no problems....If I use it on a new gun and something does go wrong or the stock would break I am not going to think it is the sled that did it, but it was a fault with the gun.

I highly doubt in todays law suit happy culture we now live in that if this thing was breaking stocks or not worth a thing for anything we would know about it.

It lets me shoot, it does help me zero all my rifles and when I shoot them they seem to have the same point of impact.

I think a lot of this is just info that someone heard for so-and-so, past on to such-and-such.

bye.
 
I have been shooting high powered rifles for over 30 years. I haven't hunted in 20. I shoot local and regional, long range (600-1200 yards) competitions and long range target shoot. I still love using a lead sled to get a standing group or zero a rifle. Some have no use for it but I also shoot from a $300 bipod, people will say that a Walmart bipod works as good. Or my NightForce ATACR or Premier, others say a Vortex or Sightron are as good. It is all matter of opinion. We all have our own. I am not saying anyone is wrong, I am saying I like the Lead Sled, but that's just me. We will just have to agree that we all have different opinions.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top