Liberty4Ever
Member
I bought a used Lee Load-Fast shot shell reloader on eBay a few years ago and am just now starting to set it up. It was pretty much free if I consider the 1000 hulls and 500 wads that were also in the auction. I bought some steel shot and some other supplies, and a primer feeder. I need a box of primers, and I'm ready to go.
In researching the press and other reasonably priced alternatives, I found three models of Lee shot shell presses.
1) Lee Loader - Uses a hammer to assemble the shells.
2) Lee Load-Fast - An eight stage fully progressive press.
3) Lee Load-All - Multi-stage press with manual shell advance between stations.
4) Lee Load-All II - Same as #3, with improvements
I think the Load-All II is the only version Lee currently makes, and there is an upgrade kit available to convert the Load-All to the Load-All II.
I compared the directions for the Load-Fast I have with the Load-All II. Even though the Load-Fast is old and discontinued, it seems better than the Load-All II. The Load-Fast is fully progressive, so every pull of the handle produces a shot shell. It auto advances, so I don't need to move shells from station to station manually. The Load-Fast has a resizing die like brass cartridge reloading presses and the Load-All II uses a steel collar that is placed over the hull in one station and removed in the other, which is one more manual operation and a loose part to misplace. The all steel construction makes the Load-Fast very rigid, while the Load-All II has an injection molded base and a square steel tubing column. I assume it's up to the forces needed to reload shot shells, but the Load-Fast seems more rigid and probably more durable in the long run?
I'm not posting this to say how smart I was when I bought the Load-Fast. I really didn't know what I was doing. What I'd like to know is, what am I missing here? Was the only reason that Lee moved to the simpler Load-All to cut costs by reducing part count, number of machined parts and complexity? Or were there some design issues in the Load-Fast that made it problematic, and I should just buy a Load-All II and start with the latest version? It's only $35.
One possible problem with the Load-Fast is the shell carrier. The shells insert up from the bottom and they fall out the bottom after reloading. If there was a problem in the progressive reloading process and the press jammed, I think the entire column would need to be pulled off the top to unload the press. In practice, is that an issue that's likely to be a problem?
I'll probably reload some shells with bird shot, and a few manually loaded with buck shot, but I expect most of my reloading will be one ounce slugs I cast myself.
In researching the press and other reasonably priced alternatives, I found three models of Lee shot shell presses.
1) Lee Loader - Uses a hammer to assemble the shells.
2) Lee Load-Fast - An eight stage fully progressive press.
3) Lee Load-All - Multi-stage press with manual shell advance between stations.
4) Lee Load-All II - Same as #3, with improvements
I think the Load-All II is the only version Lee currently makes, and there is an upgrade kit available to convert the Load-All to the Load-All II.
I compared the directions for the Load-Fast I have with the Load-All II. Even though the Load-Fast is old and discontinued, it seems better than the Load-All II. The Load-Fast is fully progressive, so every pull of the handle produces a shot shell. It auto advances, so I don't need to move shells from station to station manually. The Load-Fast has a resizing die like brass cartridge reloading presses and the Load-All II uses a steel collar that is placed over the hull in one station and removed in the other, which is one more manual operation and a loose part to misplace. The all steel construction makes the Load-Fast very rigid, while the Load-All II has an injection molded base and a square steel tubing column. I assume it's up to the forces needed to reload shot shells, but the Load-Fast seems more rigid and probably more durable in the long run?
I'm not posting this to say how smart I was when I bought the Load-Fast. I really didn't know what I was doing. What I'd like to know is, what am I missing here? Was the only reason that Lee moved to the simpler Load-All to cut costs by reducing part count, number of machined parts and complexity? Or were there some design issues in the Load-Fast that made it problematic, and I should just buy a Load-All II and start with the latest version? It's only $35.
One possible problem with the Load-Fast is the shell carrier. The shells insert up from the bottom and they fall out the bottom after reloading. If there was a problem in the progressive reloading process and the press jammed, I think the entire column would need to be pulled off the top to unload the press. In practice, is that an issue that's likely to be a problem?
I'll probably reload some shells with bird shot, and a few manually loaded with buck shot, but I expect most of my reloading will be one ounce slugs I cast myself.