The_Shootist
Member
Well my Bersa Thunder (surprisingly) failed at the range today. I was unable to strip it to see what was the matter so I'll take it in to one of local gunsmiths next weekend to see what the matter is.
Just in case its fairly well messed up, I was toying with replacing it with a Makarov. I'd heard alot of positive things about those pistols, the round itself seems to be a ".380 on steroids" and from what I'd heard the price range is low (ie cheap ).
I don't really NEED a replacement for my Bersa - for CCW purposes in the summer I could use my SP101/G19/P-32 (currently its a toss up between the revolver and the Glock mainly). But the Mak has me curious.
How reliable are they? What about fieldstrip/cleaning ease? Accuracy? I've heard they are kind of a heavy pistol for their size and with the small sights they have sort of a "bad breath range" pistol.
Any input - good or bad - is welcome. If not....well, maybe I'll just save up for a SIG 232
Just in case its fairly well messed up, I was toying with replacing it with a Makarov. I'd heard alot of positive things about those pistols, the round itself seems to be a ".380 on steroids" and from what I'd heard the price range is low (ie cheap ).
I don't really NEED a replacement for my Bersa - for CCW purposes in the summer I could use my SP101/G19/P-32 (currently its a toss up between the revolver and the Glock mainly). But the Mak has me curious.
How reliable are they? What about fieldstrip/cleaning ease? Accuracy? I've heard they are kind of a heavy pistol for their size and with the small sights they have sort of a "bad breath range" pistol.
Any input - good or bad - is welcome. If not....well, maybe I'll just save up for a SIG 232