P. Plainsman
Member
What Magnum loads do you folks get good results from in the 2.25" barreled Ruger SP101? Any chrono / ballistic data?
I just picked up one of these sturdy little fiveguns (bobbed-hammer DAO model) and took it for its first range session. I was very impressed. Good accuracy and controllability. The revolver also has good fit and finish, a tight barrel-cylinder gap, and a "welded to the frame" feel at lockup.
Once I get my picture-posting capability set up I will post a thread with some targets and a full range report on the SP's shakeout cruise.
But right now I'd like to talk ammo. The CCI Blazer 158 .357 JHP was easily controllable and very accurate. Kind of mild; a good practice load. The Winchester 145 grain Silvertip .357 JHP, a respected full-power load, was actually manageable as well. The little Ruger kicked, and there was about a 50 degree muzzle lift, but I could bring it back on target fast enough for useful shooting. That's a good load. I'm tempted to adopt it for carry and step up my practice schedule to make sure I can deploy it well.
I was not as impressed by the Speer Gold Dot "Short Barrel" 135 gr .357 load. It was loud with snappy recoil, almost indistinguishable from the full-power Silvertip load, and no more accurate. Yet Speer's website says it's only good for 1000 fps at the muzzle. The Silvertip ought to be good for 145 @ 1150 or so in a snub -- significantly more power. The Winchester round is a little cheaper, too. I like the "Short Barrel" 135 Gold Dot ammo in .38+P flavor as a carry load for airweight snubs, but the .357 version, meh.
(EDIT TO ADD: I usually keep a stock of the Remington Golden Saber 125 grain JHP .357 load on hand -- a good accurate "reduced power" load that could make a lot of sense in a snubby. I just don't happen to have any right now. Will get some and try it.)
Interestingly, the SP101 did not spit debris back on the shooter with any magnum loads, whereas my trusty 4" GP100 does spit. Is that difference usual? Is it a function of barrel-cylinder gap?
So far I am far more impressed with this SP101 than with my last Ruger .357, a 3" GP100 that shoots way low and binds up inoperably after 15-20 rounds. That one's going back to Ruger soon.
I just picked up one of these sturdy little fiveguns (bobbed-hammer DAO model) and took it for its first range session. I was very impressed. Good accuracy and controllability. The revolver also has good fit and finish, a tight barrel-cylinder gap, and a "welded to the frame" feel at lockup.
Once I get my picture-posting capability set up I will post a thread with some targets and a full range report on the SP's shakeout cruise.
But right now I'd like to talk ammo. The CCI Blazer 158 .357 JHP was easily controllable and very accurate. Kind of mild; a good practice load. The Winchester 145 grain Silvertip .357 JHP, a respected full-power load, was actually manageable as well. The little Ruger kicked, and there was about a 50 degree muzzle lift, but I could bring it back on target fast enough for useful shooting. That's a good load. I'm tempted to adopt it for carry and step up my practice schedule to make sure I can deploy it well.
I was not as impressed by the Speer Gold Dot "Short Barrel" 135 gr .357 load. It was loud with snappy recoil, almost indistinguishable from the full-power Silvertip load, and no more accurate. Yet Speer's website says it's only good for 1000 fps at the muzzle. The Silvertip ought to be good for 145 @ 1150 or so in a snub -- significantly more power. The Winchester round is a little cheaper, too. I like the "Short Barrel" 135 Gold Dot ammo in .38+P flavor as a carry load for airweight snubs, but the .357 version, meh.
(EDIT TO ADD: I usually keep a stock of the Remington Golden Saber 125 grain JHP .357 load on hand -- a good accurate "reduced power" load that could make a lot of sense in a snubby. I just don't happen to have any right now. Will get some and try it.)
Interestingly, the SP101 did not spit debris back on the shooter with any magnum loads, whereas my trusty 4" GP100 does spit. Is that difference usual? Is it a function of barrel-cylinder gap?
So far I am far more impressed with this SP101 than with my last Ruger .357, a 3" GP100 that shoots way low and binds up inoperably after 15-20 rounds. That one's going back to Ruger soon.