Leupold VX-1 vs. Leupold Rifleman

Status
Not open for further replies.

cdbeaver

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
473
Location
Tekamah, Nebraska
I plan to replace the Leupold M8 4x scope currently on my H&R/NEF Hornet with a Leupy 3-9x variable. There are two versions currently available, at the same price, and I don't know--and can't tell by the specs--the difference between the two.

I'm partial to the Leupold because the rear lens turret, with magnification scale--is smaller than most other variables (like the Burris, Millet, Kahles, Bushnell and the like) and lets me mount the scope lower to the barrel and still allow the hammer to make its proper arc.

Now, back to my original question: What is the real difference--if any--between the Leupold VX-1 and Rifleman 3-9 variables?
 
It's not made for Walmart. You can get the Rifleman line from any Leupold source that wants to sell them - take a look at the Leupold website.

There was a write-up on the Rifleman line in AR a couple of months ago. There isn't much difference. The Rifleman line is like the Model T: any color as long as it is black. You can't choose finishes, etc. -- which you can do with the VX-1 line.

Another difference is that, according to Leupold CS, the reticle in the Rifleman series can't be changed. For the price of the scope, I'm not sure that's much of an issue. If I had a VX-III and didn't like the reticle, though, it might be worth thinking about.
 
I may be interested in buying your m8 when you get closer to purchasing your new scope. Shoot me a PM if you'd let it go for a decent price.
 
Sorry, Whiteknight, the M8 is destined to adorn the other barrel I have for the NEF Handi, a .45-70 that now sports a Weaver K6 that won't focus properly.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top