Little Help from the Glock Fanboys: 10mm and Pics

Status
Not open for further replies.

BlayGlock

Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2009
Messages
865
Location
Texas
Despite my moniker I know absolutley nothing about Glocks, it is just a nickname I picked up in college. I have been itching to get a 10mm for a while, and although in the past I have not been a fan of Glock ergonomics Im willing to give it a try. I think I want to get a 29, because I will carry it sometimes ( I currently carry a Commander sized 1911 or pocket revolver).

I have seen that there is a 29SF version out, I guess my question is, is there a big difference in the 29 and 29SF?
Is the fullsize 10mm (20?) that much more of a hassel to carry?

Thanks.

Just for fun because we love pics here, this is my favorite current set-up:

CarryOn.gif
 
I have the G20, and it really is not great for CCW. I can do it in the winter if needed, but the G29 would make a far superior CC choice. The G20 is usually my backwoods/camp/hiking gun and it is always open carried. I would love to get a G29 someday... 10 rounds of 10mm seems comforting in such a small package.
 
Why not get a 1911 in 10mm? If you are not fond of glock because the grip doesn't fit, getting one in a caliber that you like will not make it fit.
 
I have 2 Glock 20s, one stock and one a sort of semi custom in that it has an after market 5.3" barrel and Tactical length slide (like the G35). I like them, you may not. OK with me either way.

Dave
 
Why not get a 1911 in 10mm?
Because one of the biggest advantages of the 10mm is capacity in double stack guns (wildlife defense notwithstanding). The 10mm in 1911 is great, but that's one reason to look for something else.

FWIW, I have fairly small hands. The Glock 20 was an absolute no-go for me. The Glock 20SF wasn't too bad. It's still a Glock, still shaped like a 2x4, but it wasn't too big for my hands. I haven't held either the 29 or the 29SF, but I'm sure the size difference is similar.

When you look at the actual numbers of how much smaller the SF is it doesn't seem like much. In the hand it seems like a lot--to me.
 
I have a G20 and a G29SF. I enjoy shooting the 20 better than the 29. It just feels better to me. I don't have huge hands and it took me a little while to get used to the Glock grip, but after shooting a G36 for four years I felt that I could graduate to a G20 no problem, and I did. The G29SF I bought as a bit of a compromise. I wanted a carry 10mm but also wanted a full power handgun my girlfriend could shoot on occasion. the 20 grip is way to big for her, so I went with the 29SF. It is great to carry, easy to shoot with full length mags, alright with the short 10 rounders (pierce grip extensions are a MUST otherwise you end up with a two finger grip)

If you want a Glock 10mm with a .40 sized grip, get the SF because that's what it feels like. 20 or 29 it's your choice, they are both great.
 
Get the Glock 29SF, if you intended to conceal carry it.
Use grip extensions for the 10 round mags or a grip sleeve for the 15 round mags.

Get the Glock 20SF for range use, open carry or hunting.

If you do get a Glock 20/20SF, you could make it into a 6" longslide.
lwd-g20l-left-full.jpg

(not mine :()
 
I have a Glock 29 and a 1911 in 10mm. With 9-round magazines, the 1911 holds one less than the Glock 29.

I like the 1911. I limit use of the G29 to the woods and airline trips.
 
CZ makes a hi cap 10mm, as posted above the EAA is a fine choice. I have seen Para's in 10mm.
 
Ive got a 20, 29, 20SF and 29SF. The 29 always felt better than the 20 in my hand and most others I know too. The SF versions are better for smaller hands. IMO, the 29SF is the best for those who want a 10mm Glock with smaller hands. I have medium-large size hands and I prefer the SF versions. I'm going to shoot my 29SF for the first time today with DT and G-A ammo. BTW, The standard front sights on Glocks are now held in with a threaded post and not staked, a huge, simple improvement IMO.
 
I stopped by a gun store today and they had a .40 compcat SF (I dont know Glock Model Numbers). I liked the way it felt and I think I could conceal it with some thought. Does anyone know if the .40 and 10mm are close to the same wdith in the slide?
 
Last edited:
Does anyone know if the .40 and 10mm are close to the same wdith in the slide?

The 40 Glocks are on the smaller frame while the 10 mm are built on the larger frame. The "larger" includes the width of the slide. Don't know the numbers off the top of my head but it is wider.

Dave
 
I thought that at first, but this is the auto section and I didn't want to be laughed at. I would be in the market for a nice 5 shot snub lightweight revolver.
 
BlayGLock,

The Smith & Wesson 610 comes in both 6.5" and 4" barrels, has a 6 shot cylinder, and is the most accurate revolver I own.

It will shoot both .40cal & 10m with moon clips which make reloading a cinch.

In addition to the G20 & G29, it makes range time a lot more fun. A G22/or 23/or 27 would be another nice combo with the S&W610.

Whichever way you choose to go, the 10mm is an excellent round, and has quite the following here on THR.
 
Caught up on this thread....

Question: What's the capacity for a Delta Elite 1911 or
a full frame Dan Wesson model ?

Blayglock - FYI - Denmark sends two soldiers for patrol of
Greenland in 2 man teams. They are there to census the Polar
Bears, etc. They are armed with a .30-06 Bolt Action rifle and
Glock 20s.

S&W 610 - very attractive, I would search for a pre-lock
5" Bbl. version to go with my 625 5" Bbl. S&W made a short
5,000 run - early 90s. The NightGuard model
310, w/scandium frame w/stainless cylinder takes about 16+ oz.
off the wait but a 2 1/2" Bbl. I like full moon clips.

Randall
 
I don't feel the SF is any better than the regular one, but I find the regular one comfortable. I guess those with smaller hands would appreciate it more.
 
The difference between the standard 20 and the SF depends on hand size. those that find the standard 20 "comfortable" don't seem to notice a significant difference.

But those with smaller hands/shorter fingers do.

I fall into the latter category, but more importantly, for ME, is that the SF frame does NOT, repeat, does NOT point high for me. It points the way it is supposed to, unlike the other full-size Glocks.

At least handle a 20-SF before making a decision. Personally, for a first time 10mm, disregard the 29 for now.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top