Diggler
Member
It's England.
We fought the Revolutionary War because they didn't know how to treat their citizens.
We fought the Revolutionary War because they didn't know how to treat their citizens.
Cosmoline; Do what I did... quit flying.
Either way they and probably most of our founding fathers and early Presidents would be deemed terrorists and sent to Gitmo.
Exactly right, St. Johns. None of us are in a 'safe harbor'.Citizens of all western countries founded on principles of liberty and democracy have much to be vigilant about.
They were subjects, not citizens. And, despite a recent English legal change, they are still subjects.Diggler remarked:
It's England.
We fought the Revolutionary War because they didn't know how to treat their citizens.
Exactly. It is frequently forgotten that, in England, there is a difference between the Crown (Queen E the 2nd), the Lords, and the commoners. The monarch and the Lords have rights (the monarch, by virtue of her heredity; the Lords, by virute of the Magna Carta and a couple of other items). The commoners do not, unless Parliament (which includes the Lords and the monarch!) permits them to have rights. Of course, this means that those rights can also be revoked when Parliament wants to revoke them.shermacman observed:
Ditto Jim Keenan!
British people are "subjects" of the crown. The only rights they have are given to them by their government.
From what I've read and studied about the English political system, the House of Commons members do not necessarily consider that constituant services (as we call it in the U.S.) are important. This is supported by the fact that many of the seats are party seats, not member seats, and so many MPs are not representatives of the people, but are, rather, representatives of their party.
And I think that Democrats in the U.S. would love to adopt a "party seat" system.
papercut
---------------------------------------------------------
Diggler remarked:
It's England.
We fought the Revolutionary War because the British didn't know how to treat their citizens.
---------------------------------------------------------
They were subjects, not citizens. And, despite a recent English legal change, they are still subjects.