Well, let's sum it up quickly. A 20" barrel on an M16A4 is going to give you roughly 100 FPS faster than an M4. You'll also have a longer sight radius, which tends to be more accurate. If your going to engage targets within 250 to 300 yards, a carbine will be handier and a little lighter. If you want to accurately and dependably engage targets to 600 yards, the 20" profile will be better.
Good answer.The answer is basically this... they are all pretty reliable and durable, but the longer the gas system, the less stress the gas pulse puts on the internal components (BCG). This is due to the level of pressure entering the gas port and thus the BCG (the closer to the chamber, the higher the pressure) and the time it takes that pulse to make it back to expand in the inside of the carrier:
The shorter tubes will tap the gas earlier and get it back to the carrier faster, thus both running a higher pressure pulse, and starting the unlocking cycle earlier.... both of which put more stress on the BCG components.
Same barrel length as an M4, longer sight radius, softer gas pulse, the proper dwell time of the rifle length.
If your going to engage targets within 250 to 300 yards, a carbine will be handier and a little lighter. If you want to accurately and dependably engage targets to 600 yards, the 20" profile will be better.
You said that already.At the risk of rocking a few boats... look at a piston system.. I have one and it's freaking sweet..
http://www.lwrci.com/p-4-m6a2.aspx