BigFatKen
Member
I posted a question in rifles and one of the responding members had this for a sig line:
This made me think on why it was put in with so much care and so few words. It makes the "well regulated" part of the Second Amendment downright ambigous by it's brevity and clarity.
I know there was a Missouri Compromise and Maine was the other State. (Common trivia question). It was mostly about Slaves but I'm wondering how such a clear RKBA Section got put into their Constution.
Were there rumblings about the Second Amendment being poorly written by 1820? Are there other States with such clear wordings?
The actual page is here:Maine Constitution
On a far lessor note, it is a well written piece of web page work. The Federal pages I have to deal with are commonly.... well..... "close enough for Gov'ment work" as people say.
Ssg Ken Henkel US Army (Ret.)
(My "cover" as BigFatKen was blown a long time ago.)
__________________
Brother in Arms
Location: Maine
" Every citizen has a right to keep and bear arms and this right shall never be questioned."
Section16, Maine constitution
This made me think on why it was put in with so much care and so few words. It makes the "well regulated" part of the Second Amendment downright ambigous by it's brevity and clarity.
I know there was a Missouri Compromise and Maine was the other State. (Common trivia question). It was mostly about Slaves but I'm wondering how such a clear RKBA Section got put into their Constution.
Were there rumblings about the Second Amendment being poorly written by 1820? Are there other States with such clear wordings?
The actual page is here:Maine Constitution
On a far lessor note, it is a well written piece of web page work. The Federal pages I have to deal with are commonly.... well..... "close enough for Gov'ment work" as people say.
Ssg Ken Henkel US Army (Ret.)
(My "cover" as BigFatKen was blown a long time ago.)
__________________