manageable recoil load for .308

Status
Not open for further replies.

efelien

Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2010
Messages
30
.308 manageable recoil load?

I have two trainees to prepare for next fall's first deer hunt. First is my 12 year old grandson who'll be in the stand with me, and the other is the 17 year old daughter of my hunting partner. Neither has much experience with high power rifles. (both, of course have their gun safety course certificate). We will be using 165 grain Barnes Tipped Triple Shock bullets over Varget during the hunt, but I wanted to load some with 165 grain 'practice' bullets which won't kick as much. Any suggestions?
 
IMR 4895 can typically be loaded down with good accuracy. If you have some H335 laying around, that might work too. A lighter bullet would help. I've never tried it, but I've heard several people here using TrailBoss for really light recoil in .308.
 
Not with that bullet. If you switch to a softer jacketed bullet that will work at a slower speed then I can make some suggestions.
 
rcmodel points you to the correct powder. Lighter bullets would be better.
 
I agree a solid copper 165 grain bullet is not the way to go about doing this.

Bullet weight & high speed produces recoil.

Low velocity reduces the bullets ability to expand as designed.

The 125 - 135 grain bullets suggested in the Hodgdon load data will kill a deer just as dead, or deader, because they will expand at the lower velocity necessary for a low recoil load.

rc
 
I wish my dad was more concerned when he taught me. A sporterized 1903 Springfield was my introduction to "recoil". After that rifle everything else was soft.
 
36 gr IMR 4895, 150 gr Hornady RN, 2135 fps from a 20" barrel.
39 gr IMR 4895, 150 gr Hornady RN, 2340 fps from the same rifle.
Good accuracy with the 39 gr load. Maybe with the 36, too. Didn't really shoot enough of the 36 to know.
Tried to work up some loads like this with Varget once. Didn't work well for me.
 
Thanks! I surely wouldn't use the 165 gr TTSX for practice at $.80 each! I will switch to some lighter bullets for practice. All the shots we ever get are in the woods at less than 40 yards, so they need to learn to hit at that distance. I also will make them both do some shooting when they don't know if a live round is in the chamber or not to (hopefully) minimize flinching.
 
Why teach them on one thing then change everything they know when it is the most important?
 
A 30/30 bullet at 30/30 velocity at 30/30 range has been known to be effective on deer.
 
The 125 and 130 .308 hunting bullets are great for managed recoil loads and nothing has to be changed for the actual hunt. As rcmodel mentioned, they are effective deer bullets and even pushed to their limit, recoil will be less than for a heavier bullet. They reliably expand at .300 BLK velocities which are in the low 2k FPS range at the muzzle.
 
Why teach them on one thing then change everything they know when it is the most important?

Because it's a proven training method.

It helps to eliminate flinching or other bad habits.

It allows them to practice for many shots without being scared of the rifle or the pounding/bruising.

When they are looking through the sights at an animal, they will never notice the recoil of one shot.
 
I understand but & I use fired case to teach with & the excitement hides the recoil & report but they are being trained to use one tool then giveing them something different at the last minute. Affective rounds for hunting don't have to have heavy recoil.

Just start with a better choice of bullet & build there load around that. You have a year to learn the bullet while you teach them to shoot.
 
IMR 4895 in my 7-08(140g bullets) and 308(150g bullets) always felt like there is less recoil than using 4064 and Varget. But, IMR 4064 turned out to be more accurate in my gun.
 
I recommend using the hodgon data that RC posted above. Hodgon has actually tested these loads and I wouldn't try a recipe unless it is published.

As a matter of fact I used the Hodgon sheet 2 weeks ago for the first time. It calls for H4895. I loaded my 270 win for my 11 yo daughter.

I made the first shot just to test it out. I started with a full charge of h4831 then shot the reduced load and Wow! Defiantly made a difference. Then she shot it and it works perfectly. I didn't even have to change the scope. It only shot one inch lower at 100 yards.
 
Personally, I wouldn't want to put a heavy recoiling rifle in the hands of a 12 yr. old without first letting them shoot it and decide if it's too much rifle for them. Either one of those cartridges are going to be uncomfortable to shoot without taking some drastic steps to reduce some of the felt recoil. And then if you down load it too much you might not have a good deer stopping round. After all, you don't want to end up with them developing a bad taste for the sport, especially if they wind up with a black eye after getting nailed by the objective end of the scope. My wife got a mild concusion, some stitches, and a scar to remember her first .270 win.. Which brings to mind optics, I wouldn't slap a low dollar, short eye relief optic on them either. $250 will provide a decent Leupold to help increase eye relief.

It's really not that expensive to buy 1 or 2 murcury tubes. If your careful, you can install them yourself. I shot a 338 WM that had one installed in it, and it made a world of difference in the felt recoil. I think they are about $40-$50 each.
 
Well here is my experience with reduced loads. I highly doubt that your 12yr old or the 17yr old are going to be any worse off.

When my grandosn had just turned three, he said to me in a most serious tone, "I want to shoot me a hog Pawpaw." Now then, to know him when he was that age was really something. He had been in the woods with me since he was able to hold on to the gas cap of my 4 wheeler, and knew to cover his ears, or put on muffs whenever I hit the brakes hard, or reached for my little Ruger Compact chambered in .308. We did a regular hog patrol at a friends property to help them try and reduce the amount of damage they were doing to their pastures and fields. As such we were there about every weekend we could be and the grandson would miss any of it.

This said, when he made the above statement, I knew he meant it. I have a couple of .243's, one of which my daughter began hunting with at age 6. I had never loaded anything down, but in this case I knew I would have to. The deal is, if your going to shoot you have to hold the rifle. It's been that way since I was a youth and began hunting myself. Granted shots weren't going to be freehand, but he still needed to be able to hold and sight the rifle himself. As it turned out everything I had except the little Ruger simply weighed too much for him to hold up even with it on a rest. The barrels were too long and he simply couldn't overcome their effects. So I was left with him using my little six and a half pound .308 which I knew was going to kick no matter what. The stock is also thin so adding a recoil reduction tube was out of the question.

So with that in mind, and being that I have a couple of different calibers of Contender, I already had an idea that I wanted to use the 125 or 130gr bullets, but the question was from who. I settled on the Nosler Ballistic Tip as his shots were to be limited to 50yds max. I started with the Hodgdon data using H-4895, and even with the lowest charge weight, the first three shots really rocked his little world. Tears boiled up after each shot, but he was determined and we worked up to 5 shots, then 8 then 15 then what ever I had with me. We practiced all summer long when I could make it up to our farm, and I set out full sized deer targets with different angles and such so to make it more realistic. I set the out at different distances and would call out which one for him to shoot so he had to change positions and I would also count out loud so he had to make the shot count, withing a 5 count. Like I told him the deer and hogs aren't going to stand still so you have to be able to get on them, find your shot, and take it, within a minimal amount of time.

Two weeks before his 4th birthday, he dropped his first hog with one shot DRT. Then not long after he made a 158yd shot on a yote. The load had been increased to around 40 or 42 grains by then and the bullet did not exit the yote. It was at this point I switched over to the 130gr Barnes TTSX, and never looked back. I adjusted the load up to 42grs, and tried it myself out on hogs out to ranges of 200yds with shots from all different angles. It never failed to exit except on two out of over a dozen, and those were shot from the rear ham and the bullets lodged under the hide on their shoulder. Plenty for me, and he used them to get a few more hogs. This was all before his 8th birthday. Just after his eighth, and it being the week of Thanksgiving, he used his mom's 6.5x55 to take his first doe, then the next year the day after his 9th, he got his first buck with my old 25-06 that his mom used to get her first when she was 9. This year at 10 he used the same little Ruger again, only this time he had no issues with dropping the hammer on a factory loaded Remington 150gr CL.

With all this said, if you want to go with the reduced loads, that is fine, but work them up in a pretty fast amount. I know that rifle weight will soak up some, but you have to admit that my 6.5 pound fully loaded and ready to hunt rifle is going to have plenty more recoil on a 10yr old than a 12 or 17yr old. Still with H-4895 the recoil isn't bad even with a full load matching a factory 150gr CL. I just recently worked up a load with it and the 150gr CL's to match the factory loaded rounds. The difference in felt recoil is there for sure.

If it were me, I would simply purchase some of the bulk 150gr CL's and start off at the start data for H-4985 and let them go for it. I highly doubt that either will be put off by them, and even with this your already hitting much better numbers of velocity and energy than if you drop them down further. Those 150's will definitely get the job done as well, on most deer or hogs. I have taken hogs down with them at over 400yds that weighed over 400 pounds, and that is saying something for a bullet that is only running in the mid 2500fps range from my short 16.5" barrel.

Feel free to look at and show both of those youths the pictures of the grandson and some of his critters, they are all posted up on the bottom link under my sig. Tell them if he can do it so can you, heck your three times the age he was when he started, and shooting the same caliber rifle.
 
Use a 125 gr nosler or sierra and a starting load of 42 grains of IMR4895 and work up and find the sweet spot. I used this load countless times over the years. Its a nice easy recoiling load good for short distance shots (under 200 yards).
 
Remember, hunting accuracy and bench accuracy are not the same thing. To kill a deer, you have to be able to hit an area the size of a phone book at the distance you're shooting. An effective hunting round doesn't have to shoot bug holes at 500 yrds if your shots are limited to 150 yrds. A reduced load may or may not give sub-M.O.A groups off the bench but it will still be an effictive hunting load.
 
Because it's a proven training method.

It helps to eliminate flinching or other bad habits.

It allows them to practice for many shots without being scared of the rifle or the pounding/bruising.

When they are looking through the sights at an animal, they will never notice the recoil of one shot.

But it doesn't prepare them for the scope eye they're going to get when you switch the load on them. IMHO, it's best to use the youth loads recommended for practice and hunting.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top