AStone
Member
Summary of this post: in comparing the Marlin 336C with their 336W, is there any difference in terms of materials & workmanship in the most important parts of the rifle: the action, barrel, etc?
___________
Background for those who want it:
In the last couple of weeks, I've taken a new turn in my months long (nearly year long) search for that do-everything-cause-I-can-only-afford-one centerfire rifle.
I've been impressed and inspired by a project by THR's George Hill that he calls CAR: cowboy assault rifle, a modification of a Marlin 336 in .30-30.
George's THR thread is here.
The full story with images is here.
As a former Marlin 336 owner who regrets ever having sold it ,
even if it was out of necessity at the time, I want a CAR.
So, I've started looking around for Marlins, both new and used.
Marlin currently produces three 336 versions: A, C, SS (stainless) & W.
New, W is about $100 less than C. I've started looking into why since it's not entirely clear on their web pages about 336C & 336W.
This afternoon, I read through a bunch of THR threads from the archives about this issue. It seems that the main differences are stock (C is walnut, W is hardwood) and some hardware, like less expensive sights, barrel rings & buttplate on the W. (For example, see post #9 in this thread.)
Since I would put a synthetic Ramline stock on it, it seems foolish to purchase a 336C with that beautiful walnut furniture. The buttplate also doesn't matter, and I can always upgrade the sights.
But still, I have trouble believing that a walnut stock and slightly better external hardware would increase price by $100.
So, I'm posting this to double check with our Marlin experts: I want to make sure that the most important parts of the 336W are the same as the 336C with no quality shortcuts: the action, barrel, etc.
My concern is that Marlin may do for the 336W what Remington does with its 870 Express series. The latter are good guns, but some corners were cut in materials and workmanship to bring the price down.
Thanks in advance for any information. Sources appreciated.
Nem
___________
Background for those who want it:
In the last couple of weeks, I've taken a new turn in my months long (nearly year long) search for that do-everything-cause-I-can-only-afford-one centerfire rifle.
I've been impressed and inspired by a project by THR's George Hill that he calls CAR: cowboy assault rifle, a modification of a Marlin 336 in .30-30.
George's THR thread is here.
The full story with images is here.
As a former Marlin 336 owner who regrets ever having sold it ,
even if it was out of necessity at the time, I want a CAR.
So, I've started looking around for Marlins, both new and used.
Marlin currently produces three 336 versions: A, C, SS (stainless) & W.
New, W is about $100 less than C. I've started looking into why since it's not entirely clear on their web pages about 336C & 336W.
This afternoon, I read through a bunch of THR threads from the archives about this issue. It seems that the main differences are stock (C is walnut, W is hardwood) and some hardware, like less expensive sights, barrel rings & buttplate on the W. (For example, see post #9 in this thread.)
Since I would put a synthetic Ramline stock on it, it seems foolish to purchase a 336C with that beautiful walnut furniture. The buttplate also doesn't matter, and I can always upgrade the sights.
But still, I have trouble believing that a walnut stock and slightly better external hardware would increase price by $100.
So, I'm posting this to double check with our Marlin experts: I want to make sure that the most important parts of the 336W are the same as the 336C with no quality shortcuts: the action, barrel, etc.
My concern is that Marlin may do for the 336W what Remington does with its 870 Express series. The latter are good guns, but some corners were cut in materials and workmanship to bring the price down.
Thanks in advance for any information. Sources appreciated.
Nem