marlin lever action

Status
Not open for further replies.

josh1022

Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2009
Messages
9
Location
louisiana
Has Marlin ever made their 1894 in 30-30?

When I was growing up I had a 1894 in .357 and killed 5 deer with it, then my dad traded it for a .270 that I still have. The .270 is a great long distance rifle for me but I like to hunt deeper in the woods and in thick brush where the smaller lighter gun would be handy. I started looking around for a 1894 in 44 cal but I realised that the 30-30 cartridge is a far superior round. Then I found that I couldn't find a 1894 30-30.... What gives?....

I would like to have the 30-30 cartridge but I am not willing to compromise on the marlin 1894 style rifle. If I can't find it in 30-30 I guess I'll just be getting the .44. :rolleyes:
 
Marlin's .30-30 rifle offering is the Marlin 336; it is an excellent rifle. However you speak of the Marlin 1894, which is their pistol Caliber levergun model, and that comes in .45 Colt, .44 Mag/.44 Spc, and .357 Mag/.38 Spc chamberings.

I have a model 1894SS in .44 Mag and could not be happier with it. You will find out of that long rifle bbl that your ballistics (especially within 100 yards) are going to be just as good as a .30-30, but your rifle will also carry more rounds then a 30-30 offering.
 
Over the years, Marlin has offered the 336 (.30-30) in a variety of configurations. If you really like the 1894 styling (as do I), look for a 336 with a straight stock. I managed to pick up a pre-crossbolt safety 336 Texan some time back that has the traditional straight stock, but the side-eject the Marlin is favored for. They're out there ... just few and far between. Good luck with the hunt!
 
The 1894 models are for the shorter pistol rounds like .357M, 44M, 45Colt, etc, while the 336 is in 30-30 & 35Rem.
 
If I reloaded (someday!) I'd have a 1894 in 44mag. But I am pretty happy with mine in .357.
You have fast .357 bite with just over a 22lr recoil in just the factory loads.
 
Last edited:
The 336 is the descendent of the 1893, which is a longer receiver that is very similar to the 1894.

However, if what you really want is a straight stock, they are out there. They're not in current production, but the 336 has been made with a straight stock.

If you're interested in the history and evolution of Marlin lever guns, check this out: http://leverguns.com/leverguns/marlin_leverguns.htm

This is the 1893:
marlin1893..jpg
 
Mossberg makes a straight stock .30-30. I shot one of the first 100 in the country. It is a nice rifle, nice fit and finish and it shot very well.

I love my 336, but the Mossberg is another option for you.
 
Mossberg makes a straight stock .30-30. I shot one of the first 100 in the country. It is a nice rifle, nice fit and finish and it shot very well.

I love my 336, but the Mossberg is another option for you.

This, right?

Click
 
Abel, that's a joke.:)

BTW Winchester seems to be bringing back the 94, also, though I do like Marlins.

The first 94s issued are collector's editions, so it may be a little while before you can get a field grade gun.

All of that said, the Marlin lets you mount a Skinner sight on the receiver with no drilling. I recently put one on a Marlin 39A, and I probably won't be interested in anything but a Marlin for field use. Those things are wonderful: they don't get in the way like a tang sight, and they don't stick off the side like other receiver peeps. They are MUCH quicker and more accurate than the stock sights.

http://skinnersights.com/
 
Why does Mossberg put those stupid muzzle brakes on everything?
Not yet...but it is only a matter of time. I think they would put one on a fishing pole if they made one.

The 1894 is a fine gun, but so is the 336 (and the 1895 is you really want a thumper for a brush gun). The only disadvantage is the slight increase in weight (about 8oz.). If it were me I would opt for the 1895 .45-70Govt. because it is more gun at the same weight (as the 336).

:)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top