Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Massachusetts: "Reflections on right to bear arms"

Discussion in 'Legal' started by cuchulainn, Dec 31, 2002.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. cuchulainn

    cuchulainn Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    3,297
    Location:
    Looking for a cow that Queen Meadhbh stole
    http://www.gazettenet.com/12302002/columns/3193.htm

     
  2. Standing Wolf

    Standing Wolf Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    24,041
    Location:
    Idahohoho, the jolliest state
    Quote: ...I have an unoriginal thought: Felons are already banned from possession of all firearms, so any new restrictions only curtail the rights of the lawful, right?

    The point of leftist extremist so-called "gun control" has nothing to do with crime or criminals and everything to do with disarming commoners. Attempting to reason with leftist extremists is like discussing disease with rabid dogs.
     
  3. Nathaniel Firethorn

    Nathaniel Firethorn Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    1,672
    Location:
    Exit 8A, Peoples' Republic of Corzinistan
    Cheif Fleury sounds pretty cool. Especially for PRMA.

    - pdmoderator
     
  4. 4v50 Gary

    4v50 Gary Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2002
    Messages:
    18,527
    Chief Fleury is our type of chief. If he retires, I'd sure like to see him in charge of some department out here in CA. In fact, we the members would probably fight to get him into our community.
     
  5. AmericanFreeBird

    AmericanFreeBird Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    172
    2nd Amendment basics

    These three English statements all have the same meaning but give three different reasons for it:

    1) Because ships float in the sea and paper is made of wood, The Right of The People to Keep and Bear Arms Shall not be Infringed.

    2) A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, The Right of The People to Keep and Bear Arms Shall not be Infringed.

    3) Because people eat too much pizza and not enough vegetibles, The Right of The People to Keep and Bear Arms Shall not be Infringed.

    If you know anything about the English language, and I hope someone who is appointed as a federal or state Judge does, then you know that the first part of any of the above statements simply tells you why I said "The Right of The People to Keep and Bear Arms Shall not be Infringed." The why does not matter unless you're just curious and has no effect on the what, the what is still "The Right of The People to Keep and Bear Arms Shall not be Infringed". Regardless of why I said it the fact still remains I said "The Right of The People to Keep and Bear Arms Shall not be Infringed".

    Any questions?
     
  6. Mr. Hankey

    Mr. Hankey Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    60
    Location:
    The Kommonwealth
    As a subject here in the Kommonwealth, it's nice to know that there are still a few people of authority left here, that are pro gun.

    Unfortunately, it seems they are all out in the western part of the state.
     
  7. Blackhawk

    Blackhawk Member In Memoriam

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    3,882
    Great article about a good man! :D
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page