Matters of accuracy: AR upper build.

Status
Not open for further replies.

WestKentucky

Member
Joined
Feb 1, 2014
Messages
13,128
Location
Western Kentucky
Barrel:
Reciever:
Selection of reciever seems to be all about tight tolerances and specific features you do or do not want. The features seem to have no effect on the accuracy of the gun, they only effect the function of it. Billet supposedly is most rigid, but that is questionable and the cost of a milled billet upper as opposed to a forged upper is significant. I have a forged upper handy, I'm using it. If I can find fault with it, I might drop the coin on a billet job, but I doubt that happens.

Barrel
By far under normal build conditions the most important decision is in buying a barrel, and you typically get what you pay for. I already have an acceptably accurate barrel laying around in an interesting caliber so I'm skipping this decision. Caliber selection is a huge topic all on its own, then barrel selection is equally large and detailed. My barrel is a Doublestar 22" heavy bull target crown, rifle length, stainless behemoth in 6.8spcII

Barrel nut:
Each point of contact for the barrel changes harmonics, so you want as few as possible. I'm going to go with a free float handguard on this one. My thoughts are on the effect that the handguard selection will have on accuracy. The only point of contact is barrel nut which comes with most handguards. Properly squared barrel nuts should evenly apply pressure to the shoulder on the barrel and positively locate it with uniform pressures and should provide good accuracy. So realistically my thought is that when buying, a man should be focussed on the barrel nut instead of the fancy tube attached to the outside of it. The only other thing I can imagine helping increase accuracy would be to use loctite on the barrel in final assembly to help fill gaps to eliminate any play in the slip-fit section of the barrel extension/reciever, but this is minimal. I will do it, but I don't expect it to really matter at all.

Hand Guard
Now, on to the handguard, what you really buy to get the barrel nut, instead of the other way around. I see absolutely no effect other than cooling provided that the handguard is snugly secured at the barrel nut and that it isn't impinging on the barrel or gas block in any way. Holes of any form allow air flow which allows cooling of the barrel, but realistically excessive heat in a target barrel should never be an issue. Still, I want some air flow to keep the heat from the gas tube moving out rather than heating up the handguard making it potentially unpleasant to touch.

I do intend to use a bipod or perhaps tripod attached to the handguard rather than attaching to the bottom of the gas block. Attaching things to the gas block seems detrimental to accuracy. I have a railed block, may buy a different block just to eliminate that option just to make me happier.

Internals-BCG etc
Looking at this aspect in an AR can be confusing. The bolt is a rotating piece of metal that holds the round in the chamber, so it is aligning the cartridge as precisely to the barrel as possible before the gun ever fires. The bolt should be squared to the chamber when in locked position. That's not super easy to determine or correct, so simply making sure you buy a quality piece seems the only logical option to me when it comes to the bolt itself. The BC and other bits seems considerably less important, but still needs to be a group of quality pieces.

Are these thoughts logical, sensible, and functionally correct? I want to set this one up specifically for the purpose of shooting small targets from 500 to 800 yards and getting consistent hits. Let's keep this specifically about getting the most accuracy as reasonably possible, and keep it specific to the upper.
 
Since you're choosing 6.8 SPC and everything in your list sounds relatively heavy (especially the barrel), this sounds like a rifle that will only be used on a bipod or tripod as I can't imagine trying to hold up a 22" bull barreled rifle to try and shoot offhand. I've also heard of people squaring the face of the upper to the barrel (I think) to try to improve accuracy as well.

I have 2 6.8 SPC rifles and a 22" barrel is abnormally long. Having said that, it should help with muzzle velocity to reach the distances you stated, but I'm not familiar with the quality/accuracy of Double Star barrels in that caliber. Did you look at any other barrel makers, or did you settle on Double Star because they offered that unusual length barrel? Will you be handloading for this rifle because that can have a tremendous effect on accuracy...more than any of the factors you've mentioned except the barrel.

I would also get a long handguard (15") to be able to get the bipod/tripod as far forward as possible.

Good choice on the upper...I have both a Mega forged rifle and a Mega billet rifle. I don't know about rigidity, but the billet is definitely heavier.
 
My guns only eat my own hand loads. I'm too cheap to buy factory ammo that is inferior to what I can do myself. As for the barrel, it came as a complete upper I stripped to build the 223 upper I have been using. I bought a complete used upper for considerably less than I could have bought parts to build, even after I bought the Hbar match barrel to go on in place of the barrel I'm using for this build. And yes, I'm looking at long handguards for that purpose. If I keep the current gas block I will buy 12" but if I replace it I will buy a 15"
 
I'd say unless you're using open sights mounted on the gas block, get rid of the bulky, railed gas block and put a low pro block on that can fit underneath a 15" handguard.

Other than that, I have nothing really to add for the accuracy discussion.

Do you know what bullet you might load?

Edit to add: I just looked at the Doublestar website and did you notice the red note at the bottom that says "Bull barrels are 1.05" in diameter at the extension and will not accept a standard Mil Spec barrel nut"?
 
I had not seen that, but I knew it was big. Not sure I would have caught that, but i don't think it would be s big deal since I already have the nut and handguard that was on it before. If the handguard threads are the same which I bet they are, I would be able to just swap nuts and go right back together with both. My 223 is torn apart right now anyways so no big deal.
 
Billet receivers can sometimes have compatibility issues with the mating parts, so make sure they all fit before committing to the assembly. A good quality forged milspec receiver should be good enough for most anybody.

Geissele recommends using antiseize on the barrel nut and properly torqueing it, rather than using locktite on it. At some point, you may want to take it apart. Both my uppers have antiseize on the nuts, haven't come loose yet (35 ft-lb torque) in a couple thousand rounds.

I agree with the longer handguard, if you plan to use a bipod. 15" on a 22 inch barrel, IMO.

And match the bolt to the barrel, or take the pains to ensure proper headspace.
 
Oh, on bullet...I have some Sierra 115s and 100s (psp) I tried in .270 win that I will try. I'm hoping those 115s will work. It would be really nice if the 130s I use in .270 would work but I know they are too long.
 
Think you will find most 270 bullets 130g or higher won't work at 6.8 velocities. The extra length would require single feeding or magazine modifications. Visit 68forums as there is a current thread on there using the 130 g bullets that might help you out. I have several 6.8 myself and your thinking of 500-800 yards is a bit optimistic but report back with the results.
Try some Nosler 115 Custom Comps.

Missed that it was for target and not hunting!
 
Last edited:
Not sure of your budget, but look into Barnes 95 TTSX or Hornady 120 SST. Both are intended for 6.8, but I'd be willing to bet you'd do ok with a 130 out of a 22" barrel. That extra barrel length might get you the muzzle velocity you need to reach out to 7-800 yards.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top