allaroundhunter
Member
For law enforcement... what has to happen to allow an officer to engage a "suspect"?
I ask because, somehow California officers shot two women because they were in a vehicle that matched the description of the vehicle that the alleged cop-killer was driving.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/feb/7/manhunt-under-way-ex-cop-suspected-killing-cop-cou/
By the details given, this is not an "accidental shooting". The officers knew shot what they were aiming at. It was negligent because (I hope) they did not properly identify their target before firing.
Heck, our soldiers overseas have stricter ROEs than California cops it seems...
Sorry if this is off-topic, I am just wondering what actually has to happen for an officer to be able to fire his or her weapon. I understand that all the details of this shooting are not released, so let's not over-speculate.
I ask because, somehow California officers shot two women because they were in a vehicle that matched the description of the vehicle that the alleged cop-killer was driving.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/feb/7/manhunt-under-way-ex-cop-suspected-killing-cop-cou/
By the details given, this is not an "accidental shooting". The officers knew shot what they were aiming at. It was negligent because (I hope) they did not properly identify their target before firing.
Heck, our soldiers overseas have stricter ROEs than California cops it seems...
Sorry if this is off-topic, I am just wondering what actually has to happen for an officer to be able to fire his or her weapon. I understand that all the details of this shooting are not released, so let's not over-speculate.