MD State Police Harrassment Over Ammo Purchase

Status
Not open for further replies.

moga

Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2006
Messages
181
Location
Atlanta, GA
http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=8891

Hello Henry.

I just wanted your organization to know what Our State Police are up too. The incident below happened to me, a legal gun owner in La Plata, Maryland two nights ago (August 4, 2008 at 12:30 PM). Next time, they won't get in without a warrant. You live and you learn. Below, is the e-mail I sent to Mr. Chris Contee NRA, Chief Counsel at his request. I know I'm not an isolated incident so I hope your members keep their doors locked.

Dear Chris,

It was great to speak with you today by phone. Sorry but also glad you are so busy with our legislative matters. What would we do without you and the NRA?

As I told you by phone, my Wife and I were unfairly besieged late last night by the Maryland State Police. I have also relayed this occurrence to "Citizens Group for the right to keep and bear arms". I believe they are in Seattle Washington. Enclosed is my summation for your review. Good luck on your trip and safe travel.

Last night at 12:30 pm a MD State Police "Armed Response Team" showed up at our door. I was dead asleep, my Wife was laying some ceramic tile on our basement floor when our driveway alert went off several times. She looked at the camera monitor and screamed that Police in Assault gear were running up to our front door. That made me sit straight up from a dead sleep.

We thought they were there for my Brother in Law who had just been mailed Bench Warrants to our home, but he doesn't live here and he is already incarcerated, so my Wife opened the door for them. Then I heard one of them say he had some papers for me or needed to speak with me,so I got up to speak with them 6 or 7 officers in full assault vests, etc. and NO ONE in uniform. Four heavily armed police came into the house while at least two others walked around outside of our home.

One, began to talk to me asking me about the types of weapons I own. Remember now, I was just startled from a dead sleep and I kept asking why are you here, why do you want to know about my guns? Every gun I bought in Maryland I bought from a MD Dealer. Well this Trooper said that I had purchased a "large amount" of ammunition recently and wanted to know why. When I questioned why he was asking, then he changed his tune to what type of Handguns I had. I told him I just purchased my first handgun in Maryland last week, but had not even picked it up from the Store . He questioned me about other handguns I might own and I realized that he was "fishing" to match his list of my ammunition purchases with handguns that I owned. Then I told him about my C&R license that I had purchased 2 with that but was not required to register them with ST. Police. Moreover, I told him it was the MD. ST. Police who approved me as a "designated collector" so why are they here in storm trooper fashion at 12:30 pm maybe to kill me because I legally bought some handgun ammo? He told me that most of the ammo I purchased was for weapons that they had no record of me having registered so the "SYSTEM" Flagged me. Flagged me for what? Death, Harassment at midnight by 7 Storm Troopers?

I asked, "... does your system know that it is stupid to buy ammo with your own ID if your are going to do something illegal, Does your system know that I have a C&R and can buy weapons of various calibers without your knowledge, Does your system know that you yourselves registered me as a designated collector, who "collects" so it is not unusual for me to buy any type or manner of ammunition and finally, Does your system know that it is NOT illegal to purchase handgun ammunition in the State of Maryland whether or not you own that caliber handgun?"

The Trooper (plain clothes), had a list of ammo calibers that he referred to and I agreed, there's no secret that I bought the ammo, but so what? And I'm still not sure of the States definition of a "large amount". Look, I'm not outfitting a Militia, hate group, or giving it to someone who can't buy it, or even buy ammo for a stolen weapon I don't want to register. Any weapon I have every owned has either been purchased at a Gun Store or I personally knew the individual I bought it from and its origin. And, last time I looked it is not illegal to buy handgun ammo, even if you don't own the caliber weapon OR you don't own a weapon at all !! So unless the law is changed, Police cannot harass people who do so.

That being said, the young Trooper told me I "should" voluntarily register all my weapons or this would happen again... because the "system" flagged me. And another thing, he kept asking where I kept my weapons, in a safe? I never answered him and he asked me three separate times as to the locations of any weapons I might have. I got the distinct impression he wanted me to voluntarily let him see/inspect the handguns for the calibers I bought ammo for, but I was ready for that. No warrant, no see. I mean, I would hope you could trust the Police, but why should I let six or seven or so strangers know where I keep guns? If indeed I had the calibers he was inquiring about?

The point here though, is that Police came to my home without a warrant, dressed to kill, trying to intimidate me about something that is NOT illegal !! This was not an Interview it was an interrogation under duress.

Funny the last thing he said to me before leaving was "... Mr. Curtis, sorry to have HARASSED you, you have a good night." Now that struck me as an odd thing for a Police Officer to say, especially if he was justified in doing his job. The last thing I'll say was that Trooper was courteous and having worn the badge, he and the team were sent by someone else, they're just following orders. However, whoever sent them to my home at 12:30 at night left a very bad taste in my mouth and NO ONE IDENTIFIED THEMSELVES TO ME NOR DO I KNOW THEIR NAMES. But rest assured they WERE the Maryland State Police. Word has it that there is a Special "Firearms" squad within the State Police and they have been asking gun dealers to keep a log of people who purchase handgun and other regulated weapon ammunition by making them show ID and signing their name when purchasing ammunition (not required under Maryland Law). Their MVA / DMV information is put in the log by the FFL Dealer right beside the ammunition you buy. Then once a week they (Police) come back to the stores pick up the logs of ammunition purchases and as in my case, they are comparing handgun ammunition purchases against known handgun registration files. This practice was first started by the Howard County or Baltimore City Police (I believe), and the MD State Police adopted this tactic as well. Perhaps it works, some criminals are stupid enough to purchase ammunition with their own ID. I am not a criminal nor am I stupid, but I was duped into signing those ammunition logs, without the FFL Dealer advising me that it is NOT mandatory or disclosing the log's true purpose.In fact I was told that if 'you' refuse to sign this ammunition log, the Dealer will refuse the sale. I will NEVER buy ammunition from that Dealer again.

We've contemplated moving back to VA or even go down to Florida for a while. But that was yesterday. Now there is nothing that will hold us back from moving back to a "Free State". Or at least a State where subversive tactics are not practiced by the Police.

FYI: I have been in contact with Attorney Chris Contee, NRA Legal Council and He/NRA is very interested in this case. Hopefully this Tactic can be publicized, excised and stopped.

Sincerely

Don Curtis
 
I think a lawsuit is the best way to go. It's about the only thing that gets their attention. That, and everyone involved in the fiasco either going to jail or being fired.

Then, take any money you get from it and leave the state! I'm sure they will otherwise give you much more attention over the coming years.
 
It's pretty scary that the MSP are using gestapo tactics against their citizens for buying ammo. This would seem par for the course in England or Russia but not in the US.
 
MD actually takes your I.D. info down when purchasing ammo? What about mail order? This is really bad practice for the state to allow this...could have easily turned into a tragedy with a single misunderstanding from either side.
 
The OP has yet to be confirmed however the MSP is being investigated by Congress for spying on citizens. This and the Berwyn Heights incident doesn't look good for the State of Maryland.
 
jr: it's not a state law, but some reports are that the state police are presenting it as such to the gun shops when they "request" the "voluntary" registration of buyer information.

This is some new "initiative" by the anti-gun-owner attorney general and governor. The public claims are that the info is collected to catch criminals buying ammo.

We're tracking this story, since that's not what the police told the homeowner at 12:30 - instead of criminal record (which the police would already know about), the police were interested in quantity and firearm.
 
Sadly, in this bastardization of 'America', this is something that's going to happen a lot more often...

Sorry to hear about your ordeal moga.
 
Really, there's nothing to add to this except that as soon as I realized the guy was fishing (actually as soon as the guy showed up on my doorstep) I would have asked for a Lawyer & I wouldn't have let them in the house ( if possible) W/ a warrant.

I said this in another thread but it bears repeating here If they're polite and courteous while they're raping you does that make it good sex?
 
Cel, it's a story that I picked up from Open Carry dot Org. It didn't personally happen to me, just so we're clear.
 
Those are some busy boys up there in Maryland

http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/local/bal-te.md.spy22jul22,0,1624609.story

Police spying prompts hearings
State lawmakers plan inquiry into agency's activities

By Laura Smitherman

Sun reporter

July 22, 2008

State lawmakers are planning formal hearings on Maryland State Police efforts to spy on peace activists and death penalty protesters, potentially paving the way for a thorny debate in the next General Assembly session over whether to restrict the law enforcement agency's authority.

Sen. Brian E. Frosh, chairman of the Judicial Proceedings Committee, said yesterday that he plans to hold hearings, possibly in September, to question state officials about the infiltration of activist groups by covert agents. The spying and surveillance over a 14-month period through 2006 was exposed last week when state police turned over records to the American Civil Liberties Union, which had sued to obtain them.

"The best face you can put on this is that it was an egregious misapplication of resources," said Frosh, a Montgomery County Democrat. "With all of the problems we have in the state of Maryland, I can't believe that the state police would be wasting time spying on folks who are opposed to the death penalty or war."

David Rocah, a staff attorney with the ACLU of Maryland, called on Gov. Martin O'Malley yesterday to take the lead by introducing legislation when the General Assembly reconvenes in January to impose legally binding controls on the state police. Rocah said new laws are needed because internal guidelines - and promises from the Democratic governor that the spying has ceased in his administration - are not sufficient to curb abuses.

"It will be important for the legislature to put in place controls that are binding to ensure that internal controls are, in fact, in place and to provide a mechanism to ensure they are, in fact, followed," Rocah said. "Because if there were internal controls in place here, they obviously weren't followed."

O'Malley spokesman Shaun Adamec said the governor has had lengthy discussions with Col. Terrence B. Sheridan, the state police superintendent, and commanders in charge of investigations. Adamec said O'Malley, who took office in January 2007, is confident that the state police will not undertake surveillance without evidence of wrongdoing during his administration and that legislation isn't necessary at this point.

"While the state police need the tools and the resources necessary to legally investigate credible threats against public safety, the governor has been clear that any and all investigations that the state police conduct should be based on those credible threats," Adamec said.

Sheridan said in a statement Thursday that no illegal actions have ever been taken by state police against citizens or groups lawfully exercising their right to free speech and assembly.

According to the ACLU, which released 43 pages of state police summaries and computer logs last week, at least two undercover agents spent 288 hours monitoring and recording peaceful protest activities. During that time, agents infiltrated the Baltimore Pledge of Resistance, a peace group; the Baltimore Coalition Against the Death Penalty; and the Committee to Save Vernon Evans, a death row inmate.

One printout indicates that an undercover officer attended meetings in 2005 of the Pledge of Resistance and reported information about the group's political activities, including discussions about a meeting with then-Rep. Benjamin L. Cardin in which they asked him to support a timetable for troop withdrawal from Iraq. Some of the group's most active members are Catholic nuns, the ACLU noted.

Police also entered the names of activists in a law enforcement database of people suspected of being terrorists or drug traffickers, the documents show. The ACLU said that nothing in the documents indicated criminal activity or intent and that they only referenced two instances that could be construed as unlawful activity - both of which were cases of nonviolent civil disobedience.

Lawmakers said it is too early to determine whether legislation will be introduced and what form it might take. Frosh said that, in theory, lawmakers could draft a measure to specifically prohibit the state police from spying unless they have probable cause that a crime has been committed or is about to be committed. Drafting such language would entail a balancing act to ensure police can still fight crime and protect homeland security, he said.

The ACLU has asked O'Malley's administration to preserve surveillance records because the group is considering litigation against state or local authorities. Rocah said a lawsuit might not be necessary if there is a full and public accounting of all spying by state police and if new rules are put in place through legislation. He said individuals who have been the subject of spying also should be notified and given the chance to remove their names from any databases into which they have been entered.

Sen. James Brochin, who requested a formal hearing in a letter to Frosh, said lawmakers would seek answers to many unresolved questions, including what prompted the police investigations, what threat the protest groups posed, who gave final clearance for the operation and whether former Republican Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich Jr. was briefed on it.

"The whole thing is disturbing; it's unsettling," said Brochin, a Baltimore County Democrat, who added that he is "somewhat comforted" by assurances made by Sheridan and O'Malley and isn't considering legislation.

Brochin said he would like to hear testimony from Thomas E. "Tim" Hutchins, the former state police superintendent in Ehrlich's administration when the surveillance occurred, as well as from "anyone else involved in this operation" and Sheridan.

Henry Fawell, a spokesman for Ehrlich, said that the former governor was not made aware of the operation. Hutchins said he could not recall any conversation with Ehrlich about it, and he declined to discuss the specifics of the operation because he had not seen what was turned over to the ACLU. Hutchins said he would agree to testify in Annapolis.

"Whatever occurred during my tenure I obviously am responsible for. I took that position when I was there, and I will continue to take that position," Hutchins said. "But I haven't the foggiest idea what documents they have or the details of it."

Sen. Alex X. Mooney, a Republican on the Judicial Proceedings Committee, said that he wouldn't object to holding a hearing on the matter but that he would like to hear from both sides before making any judgments.

"I'm not going to rest on any conclusions they are abusing their authority," said Mooney, who represents Frederick and Washington counties. "But I don't have any problem looking into how they are using their authority."
 
It's lucky no one was injured.

When something smells so bad I know it's a violation of enumerted rights I think "home invasion," not the actions of the legitimate police.

It's like mall ninjas spouting off rights they don't have and demanding that people ignorant of their rights comply to their wishes.

You can buy windbreakers, T-shirts and any jacket imagineable that says "Police" or "FBI" emblazed in yellow print. You can buy tactical items anywhere. Even delusional mall ninjas find the stuff.

It doesn't mean these guys have real police powers and it doesn't mean I'm going to risk my safety and security to felons who are posers.

I would have gotten my wife on the telephone with our police department to verify any action or warrant.

The moment the real cops would have confirmed the warrant, I would have asked for an officer with brass, a copy of the warrant and proper ID to hightail it over to my house.

Had the real police denied a warrant existed, I would have asked for their immediate help and shot the first poser to come through the door.

If I'm going to die anyway, Mr. Vancook says a bad chance is better than no chance at all.
 
I see no mention the police were invited into the house.

"Then I heard one of them say he had some papers for me or needed to speak with me,so I got up to speak with them 6 or 7 officers in full assault vests, etc. and NO ONE in uniform. Four heavily armed police came into the house while at least two others walked around outside of our home."

Definitely time for a lawyer. You never invite the police into your home. No matter how innocent you are.
 
Just a minor point; 12:30 pm is the middle of the day. If you have to write it all out again, make it say 12:30 am, which is half past midnight, to avoid any confusion.
 
There's bigger fish here. Everyone's rights are at stake.

First, news travels fast. If a sloppy warrant and foolish policing runs head-long into an attorney and justifiably armed citizen, then the practice will be addressed.

I don't care how many donuts the guy ate, getting shot, fired and sued is a real career downer. Word spreads.

(Several weeks ago I wrote a letter to the editor about some good work the police did. A local LEO, my neighbor, told me about how many copies of that letter were made and how fast it made the rounds.)

Second, as I have said, enumerated rights are like muscles. Non-use causes atrophy. Demand rights.

You know why PETA people throw red paint on little old ladies in fur coats? Because they know what might when they do the same thing to Angels wearing leather.

Squawk. Sue. Demand warrants. Follow things up. Contact the press. Bathe a mall ninja.

Word spreads.
 
jr45:
The MSP 'requests' storeowner cooperation with recording ammo purchases.

In other words: They set up a sting using under-21 cadets buying pistol ammo (.32acp or .25acp since there are no rifles in those calibers) and then offer either loss of ability to sell handguns & 'assault rifles' (requires a special license from the MSP) or cooperation with the ammo logging.

Its about the same with how handgun registration in MD is 'voluntary', but if you do not vounteer to register a handgun when you purchase it they will deny your background check.

Kharn
 
Baltimore County WalMarts have been cooperating with the Md. State Police for several years with this "legal" invasion of privacy. In addition to showing proof of age, Customers are required to sign a log book with name and address when purchasing any type of ammo. I no longer purchase ammo from WalMart or anyone who requires signing a log book.
 
Baltimore County WalMarts have been cooperating with the Md. State Police for several years with this "legal" invasion of privacy. In addition to showing proof of age, Customers are required to sign a log book with name and address when purchasing any type of ammo. I no longer purchase ammo from WalMart or anyone who requires signing a log book.

It's ironic. All the antis that support that kind of action would be apoplectic if Wal-Mart required you to sign a log book indicating what books you bought, and turn it over to the State Police.
 
It's ironic. All the antis that support that kind of action would be apoplectic if Wal-Mart required you to sign a log book indicating what books you bought, and turn it over to the State Police.

It depends on the book. Many of the antis don't have an issue with regulating speech they disagree with. Their focus is people/thought control, not gun control.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top