Opinions over aesthetics aside, Craig has done something to address the concern that many gun folk (including quite a few THR members) have about new gun designs. Instead of giving us another rendition of a 1911, CZ, or Beretta clone, he has created a new design from a clean slate. How many threads have people suggesting that the field of handgun design is stagnated by the perpetuation of conventional Browning or Walther (Beretta, etc) inspired handguns, and lament the limited number of pistols that stray from these mechanisms. We compare at length the relative firing characteristics of Brand A vs Brand B based on bore axis, feed angle, grip angle, sights, and locking mechanism, etc. Threads often cite (and not just ones by the extremists, ala WR or Handy) the cheapening of modern production handguns, demonizing, often rightfully so, the use (depending on your particular adherance to old world construction) MIM, Plastic, and "drop-in/no fit" parts.
While some of the features like the grip safety or gas delay have been seen before, there is little new under the sun when it comes to handguns, and it is the combination and execution of these elements that is indeed innovative. Craig set out to deliver the lowest bore axis, straightest feed angle, (what he considers to be the) optimal grip angle, etc, using the best materials available, and manufacturing techniques that maximize strength rather than economy. No MIM parts, No plastic, No machining short cuts. All this seems admirable when one considers how easily Fred could get by just by churning out trick 1911s. Whether or not he accomplished any of these goals is up in the air as of now. Yet here we are bashing it for being ugly and expensive, before anyone in the mainstream has spent any trigger time with one.
Expensive? Sure. Prototypes are expensive, as are small production runs of just about anything. The price will most likely come down as the number produced increases. I can sympathize with those who have been burned buying products in the past that were less than 100% functional. Unfortunately, customers like you are a necessary evil. Someone had to buy the first refridgerators, Ford Model Ts, Glocks, etc. Pre-release testing cannot hope to uncover all the flaws inherent in a design, nor can every design be tested by the military or Govt agencies before it hits the streets. This is where the manufacturer must standby their design and make things right. Sometimes that includes giving back the cash and reengineering the whole design.
As for it being ugly, I find, for example, that Glocks are the most plain, boring, ugly gun this side of a Hi-Point. Yet they work, well, and that is a beautiful thing. I hope those who think that "Life is too short to live with an ugly ___" mindset find happiness with whatever design they find more appealing to the eye. I'm more of the "My life is too precious to live with an unreliable safe queen" type. I'm not pawning my 1911's, CZs, P7's or what have you to get one just yet, but I will reserve judgement of the value of the MERC until I get my grubby little mits on one. I do, however, wish that caliber list included .45 ACP