Mexico demanded U.S. prosecute sheriff, agents

Status
Not open for further replies.

Desertdog

Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2002
Messages
1,980
Location
Ridgecrest Ca
Mexico demanded U.S. prosecute sheriff, agents
Documents show role of consulate in cases of Gilmer Hernandez and Ramos-Compean
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=54243

By Jerome R. Corsi
© 2007 WorldNetDaily.com


Rep. Ted Poe, R-Texas

The Mexican Consulate played a previously undisclosed role in the events leading to U.S. Attorney Johnny Sutton's high-profile prosecution of Border Patrol Agents Ignacio Ramos and Jose Compean, who are serving 11 and 12 year sentences for their role in the shooting of a drug smuggler, according to documents obtained by WND.

And Mexican consular officials also demanded the prosecution of Texas Sheriff's Deputy Guillermo "Gilmer" Hernandez, who subsequently was brought to trial by Sutton, the documents reveal.

Rep. John Culberson, R-Texas – among a number of congressman who have fiercely opposed the prosecution of Ramos and Compean – told WND he has "long suspected that Mexican government officials ordered the prosecution of our law enforcement agents."

"Mexico wants to intimidate our law enforcement into leaving our border unprotected, and we now have confirmation of it in writing," Culberson said.

(Story continues below)


Rep. Ted Poe, R-Texas, was equally outraged.

"The Mexican government should do more to keep illegals from Mexico from crossing into the United States, especially drug dealers, rather than be concerned about our border agents," he told WND. "The U.S. Justice Department should not be working for the Mexican government."

The White House and Sutton's office in El Paso, Texas, did not respond to calls from WND asking for comment.

Hernandez's attorney Jimmy Parks of San Antonio, Texas, told WND the documents "prove that it is wrong for my client to be in jail."

"The prosecution of my client sends a wrong message to criminal illegal immigrants who are being tempted to cross our borders with impunity," he said.

Mexico intervenes

WND has obtained a copy of a letter written April 18, 2005, by Mexican Consul Jorge Ernesto Espejel Montes in Eagle Pass, Texas, demanding Hernandez be prosecuted for injuring a Mexican national, Marciela Rodriguez Garcia.

[Page 1 of the letter can be seen here and page 2 here.]

The first two paragraphs of the letter set out the facts of the case as understood by the Mexican consul. The letter is reproduced here as written:


I am addressing to you, regarding the case of the Mexican national, Ms. MARICELA RODRIGUEZ GARCIA (DOB 4-11-1979), who based on the information obtained by this Consulate, received a gunshot wound by an agent of the Sheriff Department of Edward County, that caused injuries in her face.
As far aw we know, last April 15, 2005, the Mexican national was transported in first insistence to Val Verde Hospital in Del Rio, Tx, and then to San Antonio, Tx., where she was attended at the University Hospital. Today, Mr. Gabriel Salas a member of the staff of this office had the opportunity of interviewed Ms. RODRIGUEZ who confirms the facts of the incident.

The final two paragraphs contain the demands of the Mexican consul:


Based on the Consular Convention between Mexico and the United States and the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, the Consulate of Mexico is entitled to represent, protect and defend the rights of Mexican nationals in this country. Therefore, I would like to point out, that is the care of my Country that this kind of incidents against our nationals, do not remain unpunished.
According to the information provided above, I would appreciate your kind assistance, so this Consulate can be informed of the current investigation, and your support, so you present and file a complaint with the necessaries arraignments.

WND has learned the Mexican consul addressed separate copies of the letter to the following parties:


Don Lettsinger, Sheriff, Edward County, Rocksprings, Texas

Norman Townsent, Supervisor Senior Special Agent, FBI, Laredo, Texas

Bobby Smith, Texas Rangers, Del Rio, Texas

Fred Hernandez, District Attorney, Del Rio, Texas

J.A. Garcia, Attorney at Law, San Antonio,Texas

Lieutenant Gerónimo Gutiérrez Fernández, Subsecretario para América del Norte

Minister Miguel Gutiérrez Tinoco, Director General de Protección y Asuntos Consulares

Emb. Arturo Aquiles Dáger Gómez, Consultor Juridico

Emb. Carlos de Leaza, Embajador de México, Washington, D.C.

Emb. Martha I. Lara, Cónsul General de México, San Antonio, Texas
WND also has learned that on April 29, 2005, Sheriff Lettsinger in Edwards County advised that the Texas Rangers met with the district attorney in Del Rio and was told the state of Texas had been removed from the Hernandez case because the FBI and the federal government were taking over.

The Mexican national Rodriguez was in a Chevrolet Suburban van full of illegals that attempted to run over Hernandez after he had stopped the vehicle for running a stop sign April 14, 2005, in Rocksprings, Texas. Firing his weapon at the rear tires, a bullet fragment hit Rodriguez in the mouth, cutting her lip and breaking two teeth.

Hernandez, convicted of felony civil rights violations, is incarcerated in a Del Rio prison waiting sentencing.

In the case of agents Ramos and Compean, WND has obtained notes made by a congressional staff member who attended the Sept. 26, 2006, meeting with three investigators from the Department of Homeland Security's Inspector General's office.

The staff member's notes indicate the Inspector General's office briefed the congressmen that the Mexican consul had also intervened in the Ramos and Compean case.

According to the notes obtained by WND, the congressmen were told:


Several weeks later (after the February 17, 2005 event near Fabens, Texas), the Mexican Consulate contacted the U.S. Consulate in Mexico saying that they have a person who claims to have been shot by a Border Patrol agent. On March 4, 2005, the U.S. Consulate contacted the U.S. attorney.
DHS investigative reports filed by Special Agent Christopher Sanchez document that March 4, 2005, is the date on which DHS initiated the Ramos-Compean investigation.

WND can find no evidence the Border Patrol, DHS, or U.S. Attorney Sutton had started any investigation of Ramos or Compean concerning the events of Feb. 17, 2005, prior to March 4, 2005.

'Dictating' policy

"The Mexican government should not be dictating United States border policy," Poe told WND after learning of the Mexican consul's involvement in both cases.

Culberson agreed.

"We have it in writing," he told WND, "a letter from the Mexican Consulate in the case of the deputy sheriff from Edwards County and verbal confirmation of the Mexican Consulate's complaint in the case of Border Patrol agents Ramos and Compean."

Culberson told WND it is "outrageous and unacceptable that our government is prosecuting U.S. law enforcement officials at the request of the Mexican government."

The congressman said the revelations suggest national security may be at risk:

"U.S. national security interests in the war on terror must determine how we protect our border, not the opinions of the Mexican government," he said.

Culberson called for a congressional investigation, telling WND, "We've now got to find out how many other Mexican government complaints have led to the prosecutions of our law enforcement officers on the border, and this intimidation must stop."

Previous accounts in question

Sutton's claim he learned about the identity of the drug smuggler in the Ramos-Compean case, Osbaldo Aldrete-Davila, through consular contacts originating in Mexico apparently contradicts his explanation in an exclusive interview with WND Jan. 19, Sutton said his office learned the identity of Aldrete-Davila from a lawyer in Mexico representing the drug smuggler.


WND: So, Aldrete-Davila ran away, and as you say, at the time you didn't have any basis to know who he was and there were no fingerprints. But yet, you found the guy. If you found the guy to give him immunity, why couldn't you have found the guy to punish him?
SUTTON: The way we found him is that he came forward and was in Mexico with a lawyer. So, the only way to get him to testify was to give him immunity from being prosecuted. He wasn't going to agree to come to the United States, he wasn't going to agree to talk, unless he had some kind of immunity from being prosecuted for that load. So, that puts the prosecutor in the terrible choice of everyone goes free, we got no case against the dope dealer, we cannot make a case against the dope dealer because there's no evidence, thanks to agents and other factors.

Sutton's account also appears to contradict the March 14, 2005, memo from Special Agent Christopher Sanchez which claimed the government learned Aldrete-Davila's identity from Border Patrol Agent Rene Sanchez in Willcox, Ariz.

As WND reported, Christopher Sanchez's memo had claimed Rene Sanchez and Aldrete-Davila grew up together in Mexico. Rene Sanchez, the memo said, learned Aldrete-Davila was the drug smuggler involved in the incident with agents Ramos and Compean after his mother-in-law had a phone call with Aldrete-Davila's mother in Mexico.

The memo also indicates the shooting was reported to the Mexican Consulate.


Rene Sanchez said that his mother-in-law Gregoria Toquinto went to Mexico to help her friend Marcadia take her son Osbaldo to the Mexican Consulate to report the shooting incident. However, Osbaldo declined to go. Marcadia advised Toquinto that Osbaldo did not want to report the incident, because he had actually been transporting a load of marijuana and was afraid the Mexican and/or U.S. authorities would put him in jail.
Staff notes WND obtained from the Sept. 26, 2006, meeting Poe, Culberson and two other Texas Republican congressmen had with three investigators in the Inspector General's office indicate the Mexican Consulate knew all about Aldrete-Davila. That conflicts with Sutton's claim the drug smuggler was so concerned about prosecution he was afraid to talk to the Mexican Consulate.

It also contradicts the DHS Report of Investigation released by Assistant Inspector General Elizabeth Redman to Congress in response to a Freedom of Information Act request by Poe. On a page numbered as "4 of 33," the DHS report appears to have a heavily redacted version of the Rene Sanchez mother-in-law story.

Redman was one of three DHS investigators who attended the Sept. 26, 2006, meeting with the four Texas Republican congressman. The other two investigators were identified to WND as Tamara Faulkner and James Taylor.

As WND reported, DHS Inspector General Richard L. Skinner admitted under oath Feb. 6 that Redman and the other investigators had misled the Texas congressmen. Skinner was responding to questioning by Culberson before the Homeland Security Subcommittee of the House Appropriations Committee.

Skinner admitted, contrary to previous claims, DHS did not have investigative reports that would prove Ramos and Compean were rogue Border Patrol agents who told investigators they were "out to shoot some Mexicans" the day of the incident with Aldrete-Davila.

Culberson since has called for the resignation of the investigators.

Ramos-Compean trial

The Mexican consul's role in revealing the identity of Aldrete-Davila also conflicts with prosecutor Debra Kanof's opening statement to the jury in the Ramos-Compean trial.

According to a copy of the statement obtained by WND, Kanof explained the following to the jury Feb. 21, 2006:


Rene Sanchez is stationed in Willcox, Arizona. He's actually from El Paso. And sometime in the last couple of days of February he got a phone call from his mother-in-law. And his mother-in-law lives in Mexico, in a little town on the outskirts of Juarez. And she told him that she had been talking to a friend of hers, a girlfriend of hers, and that that girlfriend had told her that her son, the girlfriend's son, had been shot in back by a Border Patrol agent outside of El Paso, Texas, somewhere near San Elizario.
From there, Kanof explained how Rene Sanchez investigated.


So Rene Sanchez investigated. He made some phone calls to people he knew in El Paso and asked if there was a shooting.
First he needed to find out, however, when that occurred and approximately where it occurred. So he immediately reported it to his supervisor in Willcox, Arizona, who told him to get more information, which he did by calling his mother-in-law. And he instructed his mother-in-law to take a cell phone – his mother-in-law actually lives in El Paso – to take a cell phone to Mexico, give that cell phone to the individual who was shot, and have them call me, so I can get some facts. And that, he did.

The individual who shot is an individual by the name of Osvaldo Aldrete-Davila. And Rene Sanchez spoke with him on the phone, and he gave him information about what occurred that day.

Kanof said nothing to the jury suggesting the information about Aldrete-Davila actually came from the Mexican consul, who contacted the American Consulate in Mexico, who in turn contacted DHS and prosecutor Sutton's office.

While Ramos and Compean are in federal prison, Aldrete-Davila has found an American lawyer and plans to sue the Border Patrol for $5 million for allegedly violating his civil rights.
 
And I demand they take back their 3 million illegals that cross the boarder with their blessing each year, the US should tell them to take a long hike off a short bridge. :cuss:
 
"The Mexican government should do more to keep illegals from Mexico from crossing into the United States, especially drug dealers, rather than be concerned about our border agents," he told WND. "The U.S. Justice Department should not be working for the Mexican government."

I think it would make even more sense to forment revolution in Mexico.

They can start the deportations at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.

If that was a motion, please consider it seconded.
 
It is quite obvious what is happening. These drug pukes from South of the Border are trying to intimidate law enforcement on this side of the border just as they have intimidated law enforcement on their side of the border.

It will take aggressive and decisive action against these people. Starting from the dupes running the stuff across the border to the kingpin drug lords to the traitors on this side of the border, no holds must be barred. When corruption is found, it must be dealt with severely.

Woody

How you prepare yourself today is all you'll have to defend yourself tomorrow. B.E. Wood
 
We are creating a rogue narco-state inside America. It would behoove us to identify who the complicit players are in this atrocity before our nation is carved up by armed warlords.
 
Bush

Good: lowered taxes, successfully took out Taliban, prevented attacks on American soil, appointed conservative judges - some reluctantly, i.e. Alitto'

Bad: Refuses to uphold his oath of office to protect and defend America from invasion (by Mexico), grossly mismanaged war in Iraq by turning a successful military operation into a failed experiment in social development, signed McCain-Feingold, tried to scam us on the Dubai Port deal, appointed Alberto Gonzales as Attorney General, appointed or kept in office from the Clinton Administration incompetents like George Tennent, indicated he would sign a renewal of the Assault rifle ban, persecutes Americans like the two border agents trying to defend our borders, referred to the Minutemen as "vigilantes", refuses to support English as the official language, lost control of the Congress to the treasonous Demcorats like Pelosi.

You figure it out. I can't.
 
Now maybe those in law enforcement will get the same feeling that most of the rest of us have that you can't trust those in power.
 
You are all racist exnophobes. Why does everything have to be some huge conspiracy? Does the fact that some people in the chain of command lied and covered things up mean that the agents aren't lying and covering things up? George Bush is the best man for the job, just think if it was Kerry at the helm. A North American Union would be an ideal way of leveling the playing field and giving all of those underpriviledged Canadians a fair chance at a great life. Anyone that disagrees is just not in touch with my reality.:barf: :barf: :barf:


Hey, what's this yellow liquid in my wheaties?
 
It's all about money.

If the Mehicos are not allowed to sneak into the US and send back money, Mehico's ecomony would almost collapse.

Not to mention a lot of folks in Mehico want the border open to run drugs. That is the big cash cow.
 
"The World Could Use a Cowboy Right About Now" to run those bad guys right out of town, says the country western song. (There's so much wisdom in that genre, I don't know how the Dixie Twits ever managed to squeeze in, but that's another story).

Anyway, I nominate an excellent Colorado cowboy to salvage a country that's been sold down the Rio Grande River, that's beset by two major parties trying to San Franciscoize (Pelosi) or New Yorkize (Guiliani) us; President Tom Tancredo, who I would like to see as head of the Constitution Party.
 
To Pacodelahoya

"You are all racist exnophobes. Why does everything have to be some huge conspiracy? Does the fact that some people in the chain of command lied and covered things up mean that the agents aren't lying and covering things up? George Bush is the best man for the job, just think if it was Kerry at the helm. A North American Union would be an ideal way of leveling the playing field and giving all of those underpriviledged Canadians a fair chance at a great life. Anyone that disagrees is just not in touch with my reality. "

NO country can survive if it doesn't control its own borders.

The PRIMARY function of ANY government is to protect its borders. George Bush hasn't just failed at that - he has actively worked to undermine them.

Why should ANY legal immigrant go through the process of naturalization, completing forms, paying fees, and waiting, when all he or she has to do is join the line jumpers and wait for an amensty.

I personally have no idea how many legal immigrants we need here or how many should be let in. That's for other people to decide who know more about econmics and demographics than I do.

If we need more, we should raise the quota of legal immigrants, if not we should lower it.

But under no circumstances should we surrender our national soverignty to a neighboring nation on the issue of border controls - ESPECIALLY one which is so lax with its own and so rife with internal corruption and poverty.


By the way, BOTH of the gentlemen incarcerated by the Bush Administration in compliance with Mexico's directives, are Americans of Mexican extraction. NEITHER of them did ANYTHING to justify a JAIL sentence. Perhaps disciplinary action by their employer, but I doubt even THAT is appropriate. They well knew the kind of vicious, murdering thugs they have to face every day on that border - thanks to George Bush and the Mexican government. If they decided to shoot first and ask questions later - its because of what's going on there.

I don't believe in "amnesties" for illegal invaders.

I don't believe in "guest worker programs." I believe in raising the immigration quotas, if necessary for people of whatever provenance who want to COME HERE, BECOME AMERICANS, LEARN ENGLISH, and absorb OUR culture. "Guest worker programs" only help exploiters of cheap labor, the corrupt Mexican government and illegal invaders.

By the way, my ancestry is Italian and German so I think I know a little bit about " racism and xenopobia" but I'm damn happy my ancestors decided to come to America and become Americans LEGALLY - because we are the luckiest and most fortunate people in the worrd, who live in the greatest nation that ever was.

So there.
 
Tgeorge,

Sorry if my lame attempt at sarcasm set you off!:eek:

Trust me, I am on the side of true Americans on this issue.:)
 
Sorry if my lame attempt at sarcasm set you off

Sir, I must respectfully but firmly disagree with you.

Your sarcasm was not lame.

It was excellent!

NukemJim
 
Here's a novel suggestion to help end the drug related violence. End the War on Some Drugs. Allow all drugs to be bought, sold consumed and possesed without fear of criminal prosecution (mind you driving under the influence, and any criminal actions commited while under the influence would need to be punished severely) and the whole drug cartel thing will mostly go away. Not to mention all the problems associated with the law enforcement actions, filling prisons with people that don't really belong there, and all the other social problems with balck markets.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top