I would also agree, that the militia is not regulated enough. And, by regulated, I don't mean have 20,000 unnecesary laws putting excessive burdeon on them. There should be a whole lot more public firearms training (and other defense training), and it should me cumpolsery as it was in our nations younger days.
Michigan goes full auto again!! Woohoo!!
- Thread starter jmonarch
- Start date
- Status
badr1
Member
this is BS
try to organize a militia with like weapons as say the US armed forces publicly and see how fast you get shut down or more than likely shot down it's BS but the government is scared to death that given the chance the people would take over and things might be as they were intended in the consitution the people would choose a leader not THE RICHEST MAN GETS TO THE TOP OF THE BALLOT AND PAYS SOMEONE TO RIG A FEW STATES VOTING MACHINES we need a president that's had to worry about bouncing a check at the piggly wiggly to feed his kids has worked 14-16 hours a day since he physically could (not at a desk) but bleeding and sweating for every dime he ever had and was truly a leader not just doing what brings in votes for his next 4 year stint. or what makes him rich. you all may not agree but that's just it if things were the way they were intended we could disagree without all the lawsuits and politics i mean who got sued in 1890 for someone breaking into their house NOONE they shot the intruder threw him outside an undertaker picked him up and life went on. now if someone breaks your window climbs through it and cuts themselves they sue you for having windows that are sharp when they break????:banghead:
PlayboyPenguin said:Hmmm... I read the 2nd Amendment and I do not see any mention of autos. I also see where it says a well regulated militia...and there are many texts from the time period that state what they consider a "well regulated militia" and they never mention the right of an individual to casually carry a weapon. It says "militia"... when I was not on duty with the ARMY I did not get to wear my uniform or carry my weapon. I am guessing a well regulated militia would be much the same.
try to organize a militia with like weapons as say the US armed forces publicly and see how fast you get shut down or more than likely shot down it's BS but the government is scared to death that given the chance the people would take over and things might be as they were intended in the consitution the people would choose a leader not THE RICHEST MAN GETS TO THE TOP OF THE BALLOT AND PAYS SOMEONE TO RIG A FEW STATES VOTING MACHINES we need a president that's had to worry about bouncing a check at the piggly wiggly to feed his kids has worked 14-16 hours a day since he physically could (not at a desk) but bleeding and sweating for every dime he ever had and was truly a leader not just doing what brings in votes for his next 4 year stint. or what makes him rich. you all may not agree but that's just it if things were the way they were intended we could disagree without all the lawsuits and politics i mean who got sued in 1890 for someone breaking into their house NOONE they shot the intruder threw him outside an undertaker picked him up and life went on. now if someone breaks your window climbs through it and cuts themselves they sue you for having windows that are sharp when they break????:banghead:badr1
Member
PS just my $.02
UberPhLuBB
Member
Oh my god, periods please! 
straightShot
Member
Talk about a hijacked thread! Wow.
It appears that almost all have swallowed all of this, including the hook, line, and sinker.
..."flood the streets with unsafe guns"...sheez...sounds like something from one of those anti-freedom groups
It appears that almost all have swallowed all of this, including the hook, line, and sinker.
..."flood the streets with unsafe guns"...sheez...sounds like something from one of those anti-freedom groups
Vern Humphrey
Member
Dorks Unlimited?
- Status