Quoheleth
Member
A week ago, I asked a question about a CCW 9mm, particularly about the Sig225s that Gander mountain are selling. I appreciated the responses (I haven't rushed to buy one), particularly the ones that suggested I wouldn't be gaining much by switching my Taurus PT92 for something like the 225 if I were doing so just for a smaller gun.
That got me wondering. For a guy who wears shirt& tie most days (no coat in SE Texas!), I don't really want to have to stash my large frame auto. I don't want a small frame auto (I tried a few; they don't fit me well, and I really don't want something THAT small. If I'm dropping my hard-earned bucks on a gun, I want something I can use for both CCW and as a range gun.)
So, what's an example of an affordable, good mid-size 9 (let's say <$500, and the lower the better)? If I use my PT92 as a reference as "large", would a SW M&P, Springfield XD or even a Ruger 95 qualify?
Taurus PT92:
Barrel length: 5"; OAL: 8 1/2"; weight: 34oz; width: 1.6"
Ruger p95:
Barrel length: 3.9"; OAL: 7 1/4"; weight: 27oz; width: ?
Springfield XD:
Barrel length: 4"; OAL: 7.3"; weight: 28oz; width:?
S&W M&P:
Barrel length: 4"; OAL: 7.5; weight: 24oz; width: 1.2
As you can see, tHey are all about 8-10 ounces lighter, at least 1" (or more) shorter, and a smidge thinner across the grips than the Taurus. Would such a switch be worth it in "real world" carry situation, or am I dreaming? The other gun I was considering is the 3" Ruger SP101, OAL: 8"; weight: 27oz; width - unknown.
So...what is a "midsize" auto? Please save the Glock referrals. I respect them and admire their reliability; I cannot shoot them well. As my other platforms are all 1911-based, I don't want to have to muscle-train my hands for two different styles. Therefore, please don't recommend the various Glocks, savvy?
Thanks,
Q
That got me wondering. For a guy who wears shirt& tie most days (no coat in SE Texas!), I don't really want to have to stash my large frame auto. I don't want a small frame auto (I tried a few; they don't fit me well, and I really don't want something THAT small. If I'm dropping my hard-earned bucks on a gun, I want something I can use for both CCW and as a range gun.)
So, what's an example of an affordable, good mid-size 9 (let's say <$500, and the lower the better)? If I use my PT92 as a reference as "large", would a SW M&P, Springfield XD or even a Ruger 95 qualify?
Taurus PT92:
Barrel length: 5"; OAL: 8 1/2"; weight: 34oz; width: 1.6"
Ruger p95:
Barrel length: 3.9"; OAL: 7 1/4"; weight: 27oz; width: ?
Springfield XD:
Barrel length: 4"; OAL: 7.3"; weight: 28oz; width:?
S&W M&P:
Barrel length: 4"; OAL: 7.5; weight: 24oz; width: 1.2
As you can see, tHey are all about 8-10 ounces lighter, at least 1" (or more) shorter, and a smidge thinner across the grips than the Taurus. Would such a switch be worth it in "real world" carry situation, or am I dreaming? The other gun I was considering is the 3" Ruger SP101, OAL: 8"; weight: 27oz; width - unknown.
So...what is a "midsize" auto? Please save the Glock referrals. I respect them and admire their reliability; I cannot shoot them well. As my other platforms are all 1911-based, I don't want to have to muscle-train my hands for two different styles. Therefore, please don't recommend the various Glocks, savvy?
Thanks,
Q
Last edited: