Someone asked a couple of weeks ago that I start a thread on this topic. To that person I say "Here you are, Sir.":
In the U.S. Army, weapons are very tightly controlled, and kept away from the troops when not either in the field training or in a combat zone.
I have not been able to ascertain precisely when this practice began, but the best I can tell is immediately after World War Two.
What are the reasons for this? Why are the troops of the freest nation on earth denied access to the very arms they will be required to bear in times of conflict?
There are two reasons I can come up with for this policy, whether valid or not:
1. Safety. I myself served with many soldiers who had never held a weapon until thier arrival at Basic Training. I do not ever recall ever hearing any lecture on the safe rules of firearms handling during my entire period of enlistment. The two dumbest individuals I can call to mind off the top of my head were fellow soldiers. Alchoholism and drug use were rampant at the time.
Given all of the above, I believe that the powers that be decided it safer that the troopies not be allowed access to thier weapons, least they shoot one another.
2. Control. Unarmed troops are going to have a harder time rebelling against an unpopular government than armed ones.
To quote Jeff Cooper: "If you are not sure of the reliability, loyalty, or trustworthiness of your troops you had better not give them rifles."--To Ride, Shoot Straight, And Speak The Truth--pg173
I myself do not think that reason number two, given above, is a valid reason.(Although I am quite sure that there are those who do. Bill Clinton comes to mind.) At the time the practice began, there was no reason at all to question the fidelity of our troops, and there has not been since then, notwithstanding the mess the Army was in after Vietnam.
If anyone can point historically to the precise moment that this policy began, and the reasons for its implementaion, I would be grateful.
The above is in no way meant to be disparaging toward our military. I am a veteran, and proud of my service, and proud of the excellent job being done by our troops today.
In the U.S. Army, weapons are very tightly controlled, and kept away from the troops when not either in the field training or in a combat zone.
I have not been able to ascertain precisely when this practice began, but the best I can tell is immediately after World War Two.
What are the reasons for this? Why are the troops of the freest nation on earth denied access to the very arms they will be required to bear in times of conflict?
There are two reasons I can come up with for this policy, whether valid or not:
1. Safety. I myself served with many soldiers who had never held a weapon until thier arrival at Basic Training. I do not ever recall ever hearing any lecture on the safe rules of firearms handling during my entire period of enlistment. The two dumbest individuals I can call to mind off the top of my head were fellow soldiers. Alchoholism and drug use were rampant at the time.
Given all of the above, I believe that the powers that be decided it safer that the troopies not be allowed access to thier weapons, least they shoot one another.
2. Control. Unarmed troops are going to have a harder time rebelling against an unpopular government than armed ones.
To quote Jeff Cooper: "If you are not sure of the reliability, loyalty, or trustworthiness of your troops you had better not give them rifles."--To Ride, Shoot Straight, And Speak The Truth--pg173
I myself do not think that reason number two, given above, is a valid reason.(Although I am quite sure that there are those who do. Bill Clinton comes to mind.) At the time the practice began, there was no reason at all to question the fidelity of our troops, and there has not been since then, notwithstanding the mess the Army was in after Vietnam.
If anyone can point historically to the precise moment that this policy began, and the reasons for its implementaion, I would be grateful.
The above is in no way meant to be disparaging toward our military. I am a veteran, and proud of my service, and proud of the excellent job being done by our troops today.