I just downloaded all the Mini-14 manuals available from the Ruger website
http://www.ruger-firearms.com/Firearms/PS-InstructionManuals-RI.html
Every single one of them, on the front cover, says "Caliber .223 (5.56mm)".
Without wanting to start a war, I think the whole .223 isn't 5.56mm hysteria is a bunch of bogus non-sense started by the American retail arms industry to 1) keep people from putting their ammo dollars in to surplus, and 2) provide some liability protection. Note the link to the difference between .223 and 5.56 being to an ammo manufacturer's website. Yeppers, they don't have anything to gain by scaring you awary from that cheap Guatamalan 5.56mm, do they? "The 5.56 cartridge case may have thicker walls, and a thicker head, for extra strength."
MAY.
"The 5.56mm military cartridge fired in a .223 Rem chamber is considered by SAAMI (Small Arm and Ammunition Manufacturers Institute) to be an unsafe ammunition combination. " Yeah, using cheap surplus ammunition has generally been deemed unsafe to the pocketbooks of commercial ammunition manufacturers.
After all was said and done the warnings ended up saying "don't use 5.56mm in a .223
unless the manufacturer says it's ok". Uh-huh. Can anyone name a manufacturer who says NOT to use 5.56mm in their ".223" marked rifles? I will not say "it's always OK to shoot 5.56 in a .223 marked rifle". ReadTheFManual first. But I still ask, is there
ANY US manufacturer who makes a .223 chamber
not throated for 5.56m?
I've had my Mini-14 since 1986. Like Mannlicher I've shot thousands of military rounds of various flavors through it: Lake City, RG, Guat, Israeli, 55gr, 62gr, tracer...other than a handful of hunting rounds, military is all it's fired. I prefer not giving my ammo dollars to those who would obfuscate something as critical as firearms for the sake of their own bank accounts.
Oh, and the Mini-14 has been used in various military, para-military, and, um, "special operations" theaters around the world. Think they used only commercial ammo?