Harry Tuttle
Member
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2003
- Messages
- 3,093
More Gunshot Trauma Predicted for Post-Ban Era
9/24/2004
Health officials say they are concerned that the demise of the assault-weapons ban will result in more gunshot victims and increased trauma costs, CBS.MarketWatch.Com reported Sept. 22.
Officials said that the ban helped to make injury prevention a national priority. But with the expiration of the ban, "we're going back to viewing this as a purely criminal-justice issue and not a public-health issue," said Dr. Katherine Kaufer Christoffel, a professor of pediatrics and preventive medicine at Northwestern University's Feinberg School of Medicine. "I think that's a mistake, a turn in the wrong direction."
Georges Benjamin, executive director of the American Public Health Association, said that allowing the ban to lapse was poor public policy. "We went to war over keeping weapons of mass destruction away from this country, and yet we leave wapons of mass destruction in the hands of kids and criminals. I just don't understand it."
Because the ban allowed the legal possession of banned firearms that people owned prior to passage of the law, a stock of "pre-ban"assault weapons has existed in the U.S. for 10 years. But according to Christopher Koper, a research associate for the Jerry Lee Center of Criminology at the University of Pennsylvania, 10 years is not enough time to diminish that stock.
"This law was written in a way that virtually guaranteed that the effects would only occur very gradually over time," he said, "and those effects were still unfolding and have not yet fully been felt."
This article is online at http://www.jointogether.org/z/0,2522,574723,00.html
9/24/2004
Health officials say they are concerned that the demise of the assault-weapons ban will result in more gunshot victims and increased trauma costs, CBS.MarketWatch.Com reported Sept. 22.
Officials said that the ban helped to make injury prevention a national priority. But with the expiration of the ban, "we're going back to viewing this as a purely criminal-justice issue and not a public-health issue," said Dr. Katherine Kaufer Christoffel, a professor of pediatrics and preventive medicine at Northwestern University's Feinberg School of Medicine. "I think that's a mistake, a turn in the wrong direction."
Georges Benjamin, executive director of the American Public Health Association, said that allowing the ban to lapse was poor public policy. "We went to war over keeping weapons of mass destruction away from this country, and yet we leave wapons of mass destruction in the hands of kids and criminals. I just don't understand it."
Because the ban allowed the legal possession of banned firearms that people owned prior to passage of the law, a stock of "pre-ban"assault weapons has existed in the U.S. for 10 years. But according to Christopher Koper, a research associate for the Jerry Lee Center of Criminology at the University of Pennsylvania, 10 years is not enough time to diminish that stock.
"This law was written in a way that virtually guaranteed that the effects would only occur very gradually over time," he said, "and those effects were still unfolding and have not yet fully been felt."
This article is online at http://www.jointogether.org/z/0,2522,574723,00.html