More hoplophobic nonsense.

Status
Not open for further replies.

SMLE

Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2003
Messages
1,398
Location
Albuquerque New Mexico
This is from Friday's Albuquerque Tribune. I think we might ought to change the name to "Pravda".

No gun at court upsets sheriff, police

http://www.abqtrib.com/archives/news04/011604_news_noguns.shtml

By Aubrey Hovey
Tribune Reporter

A no-gun policy at the new Metropolitan Courthouse scares Bernalillo County Sheriff Darren White.

The policy will require armed law enforcement representatives to secure their guns in one of the 100 lockers at the Albuquerque courthouse, 401 Lomas Blvd. N.W.

"My biggest fear is . . . somebody produces a weapon or has some type of a violent outburst, and one of the law enforcement officers goes to grab the gun in his holster, and the only thing they find is the key to the locker that holds their firearm," White said. "That's a pretty frightening situation."

The decision to ban guns from the courthouse, which opens Tuesday, was made by a security committee with representatives from the U.S. Marshals Service, judges and other court employees, Metropolitan Court Administrator Marc Saavedra said.

"We've been planning this for four years," he said. "This isn't to cause any problems for law enforcement."

Committee members decided a gun-free courthouse would be safer, he said. Metal detectors at the door will keep the public from bringing in weapons, he said.

Cellular phones, pagers, cameras and other camera-capable devices will also be banned in the courthouse.

Albuquerque police spokesman Jeff Arbogast concurred with White, saying the policy puts officers and those around them in danger.

"An officer is wearing a uniform and wearing a badge and . . . part of their tools to protect themselves and citizens are their firearms," he said. "It places officers in a vulnerable situation."

Arbogast said there is a "joint effort" among law enforcement officials to voice their concerns about the policy to the court.

"We would certainly hope that the court would reconsider their decision," he said.
 
Committee members decided a gun-free courthouse would be safer, he said. Metal detectors at the door will keep the public from bringing in weapons, he said.

Unless, of course, someone decides to break the law. Fortunately, very few law breakers ever visit court houses.
 
Just what I ask - are they trying to achieve?

Is this a move to please someone or persons ''higher up'' ........ and/or simply a move based on that awful danger to humanity ... ''the gun'' ...... that inanimate object which has such evil intent at all times.

What an assinine decision .... hard to believe there are such people allowed to be in office.

''Security committee '' ...... yeah ... great ''security''.:rolleyes:
 
Whats up with banning the other stuff as well? I though courts were 'open' to the public; what if media people want to take pictures or videos? Perhaps the local gov wants to have kangaroo kourts instead of Justice in this town?
 
I think

that's a very fair decision. I also think that officers should have to leave their guns at work after shifts. After all they are civilians too.
 
"This isn't to cause any problems for law enforcement."
Then what is it for? Certainly not common sense. And, banning pagers and cell phones??? What a crock. Soon, you'll have to go in naked.

GT
 
The pager and cell-phone thing came about because of self-important morons (lawyers included) who would interrupt court proceedings with cell-phone and pager noises.

Several of the Courts where I practice have signs stating that the Court will impose a summary fine on anyone whose phone or pager rings during court.

I agree that cops should be disarmed in Courts unless they are there on duty. A cop going through an ugly divorce or custody case is no less likely to go nuts than anyone else.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top