Moscow, ID can't enforce gun ban

Status
Not open for further replies.

Bubbles

Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2004
Messages
3,148
Location
Eastern Panhandle of West Virginia
Moscow can't enforce gun ban

Idaho attorney general tells city it can’t restrict people from carrying weapons

The Associated Press

MOSCOW — The state attorney general’s office has told the city of Moscow that it doesn’t have the legal authority to enforce a gun ban.

Deputy Attorney General Stephen A. Bywater, in a letter sent Tuesday, wrote that the city and Latah County cannot restrict people from legally carrying exposed or concealed weapons on public property.

“The attorney general’s office has spoken,” said Mayor Nancy Chaney. “We asked the question, they give us the answer, and there we go. I’m personally disappointed, but not surprised.”

Chaney had sought gun restrictions following a May 19 shooting rampage by Jason Hamilton, who killed his wife at their Moscow home before driving to the courthouse and firing some 200 gunshots into a sheriff’s dispatch center. There, he killed one law enforcement officer and wounded two others, as well as wounding a man who armed himself and ran to help.

Hamilton then went to the nearby First Presbyterian Church, fatally shooting a caretaker. Hamilton fired as many as 80 rounds inside the church before taking his own life.

After receiving the letter, county officials said they are now concerned that the county’s ban on guns in the courthouse isn’t legal.

“It seems to say a city or county, on their own, cannot regulate weapons,” county Prosecutor William Thompson told the Lewiston Tribune.

Idaho law states that no city or county “may in any manner regulate the lawful ownership, possession or transportation of firearms when carried or transported for purposes not prohibited by the laws of the state of Idaho.”

It is legal in the state to carry an exposed firearm in public, and a concealed weapon with the proper permit.

Thompson said a gun ban within three courtrooms in the courthouse is probably valid because that prohibition was issued by a district judge. Thompson also noted that the Idaho Supreme Court has banned firearms on its premises.

Chaney said part of the reason she asked for the opinion from the attorney general was because some area residents and city employees were concerned about their safety during public meetings. She said that guns being allowed in public meetings could hinder an open debate.
 
So I guess they think that if their ban had been in place the nutball would hav eseen the no guns sign and just gone home to await arrest for the previous murder.
 
Chaney said part of the reason she asked for the opinion from the attorney general was because some area residents and city employees were concerned about their safety during public meetings. She said that guns being allowed in public meetings could hinder an open debate.

it would seem that over and above the fact that the mayor can't push her anti-gun agenda, this remark suggests that she has a rather low opinion of gun owners -- her constituents -- and that perhaps some people need to find different jobs, in the private sector.

If government officials and employees are afraid of the people who pay their salaries, maybe they shouldn't take actions that upset the people. That hardly seems difficult to figure out.

Solution? Moscow residents can vote Chaney out of office at the next election.

recommended course of action: Moscow gunnies can start organizing right now and find a candidate to get behind who will run against Mayor Chaney.
 
So I guess they think that if their ban had been in place the nutball would hav eseen the no guns sign and just gone home to await arrest for the previous murder.


Well, if they'd had their ban in place, the nutball may have driven to another locality to shoot up the sheriffs station, after he committed the murder. It wouldn't have solved anything, but the Moscow officials wouldn't have to deal with the mess. (Sarcasm off). Who's really the nutjob here. The guy that did the murders and shootings, or the mayor who seems to believe that a stupid gun ban in her town would have done anything at all to stop this lunatic. She should undergo an evaluation to see if she isn't mentally disturbed.

It reminds me of Eddie Murphy's character in "48 Hours" when he pretends to be a cop in the redneck bar. He pulls a wad of money out of some guys shirt pocket and asks him where he got the wad of cash. The guy replies that it's a tax refund. Eddie Murphy says, "BS, you're too stupid to have a job". Kind of like this mayor, doncha think?
 
I anyone not amazed that this guy fiore off '200 rounds' into the Sherriff's dispatch center? And another 80 in a church, appoarently without any return fire? ***?
 
Let's not be too quick to oppose such laws, especially on the assumption that they don't work. They do work. We have rules for our property and they are printed in nice, official looking type.

On days when we need to have outdoor work done on the property we post our "Rain Control Act of 1986" which prohibits all moisture from depending heavenwards to earthwards. It works. There is no rainfall on such days except the illegal kind. We're about to legislate the "Assault Rain and Violent Wind Ban of 2007" to protect us from hurricanes. It is sure to be equally effective.

We have lots of such property owners laws that we post as necessary. I posted the "Disease Control Act of 1975" years ago and there have been absolutely no legal diseases on our property since then, only the illegal kind. They obviously represent the failure of other property owners, including those in other states, to properly control diseases in those places. We're planning a media campaign to get their governments to have stricter legislation that will prevent their diseases from being smuggloed onto our property. We'll force those governments to bend to our will by the proven technique of sending undercover agents into those states with the goal of catching dreadful diseases so we can file civil suits in our state against the carriers they encountered.

Make your own laws. It's fun and profitable too. And it lets the public know you're serious.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top