I live in a country with strict gun laws. It is pretty much impossible for me to
obtain a hand gun and long arms are also highly regulated.
i actually agree with this since in my view most people are harmed by acquaintances/families/colleagues and neighbours. These are usually personal disputes where easy access to a firearm in a flash of anger is disastrous.
In my own country, petty criminals and social jerks/losers of all kinds use
knives since they too cannot easily get guns and would be tossed in jail after searches (they are always searched because these idiots are ALWAYS in conflict with the law). Organised crime i don't worry about since they do not
focus on me and can buy whatever weapons they need regardless of laws or policing.
Nevertheless due to the advent of drugs, violent crime is on the increase in my country and I am forced to consider mechanisms for defence within my legal limits. I would not be comfortable in a country with easier gun access since it would only arm the jerks more easily and instead of a knife fight on my hands it would be a gunfight and plenty of domestic violence would end up fatal. IN this sense i don't think that international crime data
helps since culture is a huge factor. We each have to take our own countries and make judgments accordingly.
My strategy is as follows. I have studied close quarter combat from a historic perspective and conclude the following:
1. The sword always ended up the weapon of choice in most pre-firearms countries. This is because of its versatility- fairly light, capable of powerful
axe type blows, thrusts/stabs and slashes. Excellent reach.
2. The axe was second choice. It delivered crushing blows but was slower and exposed the wielder to overbalance and counterattack. This was helped
however when the axe was single handed and the user had a shield.
3. Knives were weapons of last resort in an open fight and usually just for a stab in the back in the dark. It lacked the reach of the sword/axe and its wounds were often fatal but took time to take effect.
4. I cannot have a sword or machete in my possession. But a hatchet is just a camping implement. A small hatchet is a compromise between the speed of a sword and the power of an axe.
5. Oddly enough, the hatchet has this dual personality. In my bag it is a tool.
In my hand and it's an axe murderer's weapon. People were horrified locally when 2 bikers had a fight with hammers. They viewed that as more terrifying
than a fight with knives. The axe/hatchet has tremendous psychological impact.
My rig is as follows:
1. 10" hatchet with double blade, wooden handle.
2. Backpack with the rear lined in 3mm aluminium plate and sewn back
into the liner. This is my shield.
3. Hatchet retained in a pocket on the front of the backpack. 3" of the
handle protrude and is retained by velcro. The hatchet can be pulled out
against the velcro by either hand. The backpack is carried with the handle up like a shotgun in a back mounted arrow quiver.
4. The straps of the backpack are used to wield the shield.
With this rig i have a number of things:
1. Tremendous impact in downward blows.
2. Speed in reversing a blow into a side or uppercut.
3. Any part of the head will do harm.
4. 8" of reach against a knife.
5. My vital organs remain protected. The Alum shield is thick enough to turn
a knife and light enough to carry.
6. Even if i overbalance in a blow, my shield keeps me from being exposed to
a blade.
7. I can attack/shove/muscle into a knife holder if i have to with less risk.
8. A wrist strap means i retain the weapon if it's knocked away or i am wounded and drop the axe in shock.
9. If searched it is just a machete in my camping back which i just didn't
bother to unload after my last camping trip.
My strategy:
1. Escape if possible.
2. If impossible or they have a hostage, brandish hatchet, hold shield,
get up on toes, arm back and axe above shoulders.
3. If there is any sign of surprise or shock that changes the escape
options e.g. backing away, then run. If not or if hostage still there, start
swinging and fight to the hostage and/or the exit.
4. Within 60 secs i will be exhausted and either out of there or dead.
I think these are the best options in front of me.
Admittedly the odds of needing this are low. Most confrontations are actually
with people you know and exit is usually possible.
If it's a street attack from scum then again mostly it's possible to escape.
The most likely scenario where an axe/shield defence would be needed
would occur with multiple scum, blocking escape and intent on a possibly
life threatening beating. You could throw your wallet, pull the axe and
axe a pathway thru them but the crucial thing is when do you pull the axe.
My view is only when you think you're just about dead/disabled anyway
and then you have to use it.
There is no point in pulling an axe and standing there threatening for a while.
Pull it, show it for 2 secs and run as they back off or start swinging and run.
obtain a hand gun and long arms are also highly regulated.
i actually agree with this since in my view most people are harmed by acquaintances/families/colleagues and neighbours. These are usually personal disputes where easy access to a firearm in a flash of anger is disastrous.
In my own country, petty criminals and social jerks/losers of all kinds use
knives since they too cannot easily get guns and would be tossed in jail after searches (they are always searched because these idiots are ALWAYS in conflict with the law). Organised crime i don't worry about since they do not
focus on me and can buy whatever weapons they need regardless of laws or policing.
Nevertheless due to the advent of drugs, violent crime is on the increase in my country and I am forced to consider mechanisms for defence within my legal limits. I would not be comfortable in a country with easier gun access since it would only arm the jerks more easily and instead of a knife fight on my hands it would be a gunfight and plenty of domestic violence would end up fatal. IN this sense i don't think that international crime data
helps since culture is a huge factor. We each have to take our own countries and make judgments accordingly.
My strategy is as follows. I have studied close quarter combat from a historic perspective and conclude the following:
1. The sword always ended up the weapon of choice in most pre-firearms countries. This is because of its versatility- fairly light, capable of powerful
axe type blows, thrusts/stabs and slashes. Excellent reach.
2. The axe was second choice. It delivered crushing blows but was slower and exposed the wielder to overbalance and counterattack. This was helped
however when the axe was single handed and the user had a shield.
3. Knives were weapons of last resort in an open fight and usually just for a stab in the back in the dark. It lacked the reach of the sword/axe and its wounds were often fatal but took time to take effect.
4. I cannot have a sword or machete in my possession. But a hatchet is just a camping implement. A small hatchet is a compromise between the speed of a sword and the power of an axe.
5. Oddly enough, the hatchet has this dual personality. In my bag it is a tool.
In my hand and it's an axe murderer's weapon. People were horrified locally when 2 bikers had a fight with hammers. They viewed that as more terrifying
than a fight with knives. The axe/hatchet has tremendous psychological impact.
My rig is as follows:
1. 10" hatchet with double blade, wooden handle.
2. Backpack with the rear lined in 3mm aluminium plate and sewn back
into the liner. This is my shield.
3. Hatchet retained in a pocket on the front of the backpack. 3" of the
handle protrude and is retained by velcro. The hatchet can be pulled out
against the velcro by either hand. The backpack is carried with the handle up like a shotgun in a back mounted arrow quiver.
4. The straps of the backpack are used to wield the shield.
With this rig i have a number of things:
1. Tremendous impact in downward blows.
2. Speed in reversing a blow into a side or uppercut.
3. Any part of the head will do harm.
4. 8" of reach against a knife.
5. My vital organs remain protected. The Alum shield is thick enough to turn
a knife and light enough to carry.
6. Even if i overbalance in a blow, my shield keeps me from being exposed to
a blade.
7. I can attack/shove/muscle into a knife holder if i have to with less risk.
8. A wrist strap means i retain the weapon if it's knocked away or i am wounded and drop the axe in shock.
9. If searched it is just a machete in my camping back which i just didn't
bother to unload after my last camping trip.
My strategy:
1. Escape if possible.
2. If impossible or they have a hostage, brandish hatchet, hold shield,
get up on toes, arm back and axe above shoulders.
3. If there is any sign of surprise or shock that changes the escape
options e.g. backing away, then run. If not or if hostage still there, start
swinging and fight to the hostage and/or the exit.
4. Within 60 secs i will be exhausted and either out of there or dead.
I think these are the best options in front of me.
Admittedly the odds of needing this are low. Most confrontations are actually
with people you know and exit is usually possible.
If it's a street attack from scum then again mostly it's possible to escape.
The most likely scenario where an axe/shield defence would be needed
would occur with multiple scum, blocking escape and intent on a possibly
life threatening beating. You could throw your wallet, pull the axe and
axe a pathway thru them but the crucial thing is when do you pull the axe.
My view is only when you think you're just about dead/disabled anyway
and then you have to use it.
There is no point in pulling an axe and standing there threatening for a while.
Pull it, show it for 2 secs and run as they back off or start swinging and run.
Last edited by a moderator: